Value capturing is considered a promising additional way of funding public infrastructure development. However, its implementation is often problematic because the instruments that can be used for it (ie, taxes, fees, and other types of fiscal regulation) generally face a lack of support. An alternative approach to value capturing might be to stimulate the stakeholders to bargain over the distribution of the increment values. This paper presents an analysis of bargaining processes with respect to the implementation of value capturing based on concepts drawn from cooperative game theory in partition function form. The institutional setting of location development related to infrastructure development in the Netherlands is used to provide an empirical context to the analysis. As a validation, the game is played with experts in Dutch planning and infrastructure development practice. Our study shows that a game-theoretical approach offers a useful method to conceptualise relationships between different stakeholders and analyse the bargaining and negotiation processes to reach an agreement about an efficient and fair allocation of the increment land values.
AdamsDWatkinsCWhiteM, 2005Planning, Public Policy and Property Markets (Blackwell, Oxford)
2.
AumannR JMaschelerM, 1995Repeated Games with Incomplete Information (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
3.
BallM, 1998, “Institutions in British property research: a review”Urban Studies351501–1517
4.
BallMLizzieriCMacGregorB D, 1998The Economics of Commercial Property Market (Routledge, New York)
5.
BattH W, 2001, “Value capture as a policy tool in transportation economics: an exploration in public finance in the tradition of Henry George”American Journal of Economics and Sociology60195–228
6.
BrownH J (Ed.), 1997Land Use and Taxation: Applying the Insights of Henry George (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA)
7.
BrownH JSmolkaM O, 1997, “Capturing public value from public investment” in Land Use and Taxation: Applying the Insight of Henry George Ed. BrownH J (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA)
8.
CarmichaelF, 2005A Guide to Game Theory (Prentice-Hall, Harlow, Essex)
9.
CornetM, 1998Game-theoretic Models of Bargaining and Externalities PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam
Munoz GielenD, 2010Capturing Value Increase in Urban Redevelopment PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen
20.
MyersonR B, 1977, “Values of game in partition function form”International Journal of Game Theory623–31
21.
MyersonR B, 1998, “Population uncertainty and Poisson games”International Journal of Game Theory27375–392
22.
OwenG, 1977, “Values of games with a priori unions”, in Essays in Mathematical Economics and Game Theory Eds HennRMoeschlinO (Springer, Berlin) pp 76–88
23.
PlousS, 1993The Psychology Judgment and Decision Making (McGraw-Hill, London)
24.
RasmusenE, 2007Games and Information4th edition (Blackwell, Malden, MA)
25.
RVW (Raad voor Verkeer en Waterstaat), 2004, “Ieder zijn deel: locatiebereikbaarheid anders aanpakken”The advisory board for the Minister of Transport of the Netherlands, The Hague
26.
RyanS, 1999, “Property values and transportation facilities: finding the transportation-land use connection”Journal of Planning Literature13412–427
27.
SamsuraD A AVan der KrabbenE, 2011, “Funding transport infrastructure development through value capturing: a game theoretical analysis” in Transitions Towards Sustainable Mobility: New Solutions and Approaches for Sustainable Transport Systems Eds Van NunenJ A E EHuijbregtsPRietveldP (Springer, Berlin) pp 59–80
28.
ShapleyL S, 1953, “A value for n-person games” in Contributions to the Theory of Games volume II (Annals of Mathematical Studies 28) Eds KuhnHTuckerA (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
29.
SmithJ JGihringT A, 2006, “Financing transit systems through value capture”American Journal of Economics and Sociology65751–786
30.
SmolkaM O, 2000Value Capture for Urban Development: An Inter-American Comparison (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA)
31.
ThrallRLucasW, 1963, “N-person games in partition function form”Naval Research Logistic Quarterly10281–298
32.
Van der KrabbenENeedhamB, 2008, “Land readjustment for value capturing: a new planning tool for urban redevelopment”Town Planning Review79651–672
33.
Van der KrabbenEMartensKDe GraffThRietveldP, 2008, “How to define the optimal level of public-sector infrastructure development. A conceptual model for decision-making in infrastructure projects”Planning Practice and Research23363–383
34.
Von NeumannJMorgensternO, 1944Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey)
35.
VROM Raad, 2004Gereedschap voor Ruimtelijke Ontwikkelingspolitiek Ministry for Housing, Planning and the Environment (VROM Raad, The Hague)
