The effectiveness of policies implemented to prevent urban sprawl has been a contentious issue among scholars and practitioners for at least two decades. While disputes range from the ideological to the empirical, regardless of the subject of dispute, participants must bring forth reliable data to buttress their claims. In this study we discuss several sources of complexity inherent in measuring sprawl. We then exhibit how methodological decisions can lead to disparate results regarding the quantification and characterization of sprawl. We do so by employing three GIS-based methods for quantifying the amount and defining the configuration of land-cover change from open to built space in a 350 km2 area in central Israel over a five-year period. We then calculate values for a variety of spatial indices commonly associated with urban sprawl. Our results reveal that some urban growth patterns are so robust that multiple methods and indices yield similar results and thus lead to similar conclusions. However, we also note that many divergent and even contradictory results are produced depending on the measurement method used and the index selection.
Achiron-FrumkinTFrumkinRRudichRMelulALevineNPapayN, 2003Coastal Plain Dune ConservationMinistry of the Environment, Society for the Protection of Nature, Nature and Parks Authority, Keren Kayemet L'Israel, The Water Authority, Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, Israel
2.
BengstonD NFletcherJ ONelsonK C, 2004, “Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States”Landscape and Urban Planning69271–286
BurchellR WShadN AListokinDPhillipsHDownsASeskinSDavisJ SMooreTHeltonDGallM, 1998The Costs of Sprawl—Revisited (National Academy Press, Washington, DC)
7.
Central Bureau of Statistics of Israel, 2007Statistical Abstract of IsraelMinistry of Interior, Jerusalem
8.
ChinN, 2002, “Unearthing the roots of urban sprawl: A critical analysis of form, function and methodology”, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, http://www.discovery.ucl.ac.uk/249/1/Paper47.pdf
9.
CliftonKEwingRKnappGSongY, 2008, “Quantitative analysis of urban form: A multidisciplinary review”Journal of Urbanism117–45
10.
CohenAToralYKaplanM, 2010Monitoring and Updating of the Integrated National Outline Plan for Construction, Development and Conservation, Stage 2—Data Compilation and AnalysisNational Planning Administration, Israel Ministry of the Interior, Jerusalem [in Hebrew]
11.
CutsingerJGalsterG, 2006, “There is no sprawl syndrome: A new typology of metropolitan land use patterns”Urban Geography27228–252
12.
DuanLXuLGuoFLeeJYanB, 2007, “A local-density based spatial clustering with noise”Information Systems32978–986
13.
EsterMKriegelH-PSanderJXuX, 1996, “A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Databases and Data Mining (KDD-96), Portland, OR Eds SimoudisEHanJFayyadU, (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) pp 226–231
14.
European Environment Agency, 2006Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge (European Environment Agency, Copenhagen)
15.
EwingR, 1997, “Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?”Journal of the American Planning Association63107–126
16.
EwingR, 2008, “Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature review”, in Urban Ecology Eds MarzluffJ MShulenbergerEEndlicherWAlbertiMBradleyGRyanCZumBrunnenCSimonU, (Springer, New York) pp 519–535
17.
EwingRPendallRChenD, 2002Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact (Smart Growth America, Washington, DC)
18.
FahrigL, 2003, “Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity”Annual Review of Ecological Systems34487–515
19.
FrenkelA, 2004, “The potential effect of national growth-management policy on urban sprawl and the depletion of open spaces and farmland”Land Use Policy21357–369
20.
FrenkelAAshkenaziM, 2008, “Measuring urban sprawl: How can we deal with it?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3556–79
21.
FrenkelAOrensteinD E, 2011, “A pluralistic approach to defining and measuring urban sprawl”, in Urban Remote Sensing Ed. YangX, (John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ) pp 165–181
22.
GalsterGHansonRRatcliffeM RWolmanHColemanSFreihageJ, 2001, “Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept”Housing Policy Debate12681–717
HansenA JKnightR LMarzluffJ MPowellSBrownKGudeP HJonesK, 2005, “Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs”Ecological Applications151893–1905
30.
HasseJ, 2004, “A geospatial approach to measuring new development tracts for characteristics of sprawl”Landscape Journal2352–67
31.
JohnsonM P, 2001, “Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda”Environment and Planning A33717–735
32.
KlineJ D, 2000, “Comparing states with and without growth management analysis based on indicators with policy implications (comment)”Land Use Policy17349–355
33.
LiHWuJ, 2004, “Use and misuse of landscape indices”Landscape Ecology19389–399
MitchellK J, 1998, “Hazards in changing cities”Applied Geography181–6
38.
NelsonA C, 1999, “Comparing states with and without growth management: Analysis based on indicators with policy implications”Land Use Policy16121–127
39.
NelsonA C, 2000, “A rejoinder”Land Use Policy17357–358
40.
NeumanM, 2005, “The compact city fallacy”Journal of Planning Education and Research2511–26
41.
OrensteinD EHamburgS P, 2010, “Population and pavement: Population growth and land development in Israel”Population and Environment31223–254
42.
OrensteinD EBradleyBAlbertJMustardJHamburgS P, 2011, “How much is built? Quantifying and interpreting patterns of built space from different data sources”International Journal of Remote Sensing322621–2644
43.
PendallR, 1999, “Do land-use controls cause sprawl?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26555–571
44.
SchneiderAFriedlM APotereD, 2009, “A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data”Environmental Research Letters4044003
45.
SwintonS MLupiFRobertsonG PHamiltonS K, 2007, “Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits”Ecological Economics64245–252
46.
TorrensP M, 2008, “A toolkit for measuring sprawl”Applied Spatial Analysis15–36
47.
TorrensP MAlbertiM, 2000, “Measuring sprawl”, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London
48.
TsaiY H, 2005, “Quantifying urban form: Compactness versus sprawl”Urban Studies42141–161
49.
Van RijEDekkersJKoomenE, 2008, “Analysing the success of open space preservation in the Netherlands: The Midden-Delfland case”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie99115–124
50.
WolmanHGalsterGHansonRRatcliffeMFurdellKSarzynskiA, 2005, “The fundamental challenge in measuring sprawl: Which land should be considered?”The Professional Geographer5794–105
