The main goal of this paper is to study the design and implementation of a digital serious game for civic engagement in urban planning. Digital serious games are games that aim to support learning in a playful and engaging way. Learning about the environment and planned changes is essential in civic engagement. The study case is taken from a city district, Billstedt, in Hamburg, Germany. In the implementation of a game concept we concentrated on the design of a marketplace in Billstedt. The game was called “B3—Design your Marketplace!” The B3 game aims to provide a playful digital environment in which the citizens gain information about the current situation in the city district, have the possibility of submitting their own designs for the marketplace, vote for the preferred designs, and chat with the experts and other participants. The prototype of the B3 serious game was evaluated with a group of students and a group of elderly people. The majority of the participants involved in testing expressed appreciation for the digital serious game as a new form of online civic engagement in urban planning. The paper concludes with a discussion about the potential of digital serious games for civic engagement and open research questions.
AarsethESmedstadS MSunnanåL, 2003, “A multi-dimensional typology of games”, in Computer Games: What's in a Game?Utrecht University and Digital Games Research Association, pp 48–53
2.
AbtC, 1970Serious Games (Viking Press, New York)
3.
BattyM, 2005Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-based Models, and Fractals (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
4.
HibaBen MFischerRFranzkeSGutbierHLandahlBLubbeSMenzelFRossiusSSchmidtF, 2009, “P3 Project: Playful Public Participation report”, HafenCity University Hamburg, Germany
5.
BerridgeK C, 2003, “Pleasures of the brain”Brain and Cognition52106–128
6.
BryantJVordererP (Eds), 2006Psychology of Entertainment (Routledge, New York)
7.
BryantJRoskos-EwoldsenD RCantorJ (Eds), 2003Communication and Emotion: Essays in Honor of Dolf Zillmann (Routledge, New York)
8.
CarverS, 2001, “The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: Developing a research agenda for the 21st century”URISA: Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association1561–71
9.
ChengN Y-W, 1999, “Playing with digital media: Enlivening computer graphics teaching”, in Proceedings of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture Eds AtamanOBermudezJ, Media and Design Process [ACADIA '99/ISBN 1-880250-08-X] Salt Lake City 29–31 October, pp 96–109, http://design.uoregon.edu/nywc/old/design@darkwing/nywc/pdf/acadia99-play-cheng.pdf
10.
CraigW JHarrisT MWeinerD, 2002Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (Taylor and Francis, London)
CsikszentmihalyiM, 1990Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (Harper and Row, New York)
13.
DamasioA, 2006Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain (Vintage Books, London)
14.
de RooG, 2010, “Planning and complexity: An introduction”, in A Planner's Encounter with Complexity Eds De RooGSilvaE A (Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey)
15.
de RooGSilvaE A (Eds), 2010A Planner's Encounter with Complexity (Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey)
16.
EgenhoferMMarkD, 1995, “Naive geography”Spatial Information Theory Eds FrankAKuhnW (Springer, Berlin) pp 1–15
17.
ErmiLMäyräF, 2005, “Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion”, presented at DiGRA Conference: Changing Views—World in Play, Digital Games Research Association, Vancouver
18.
FullertonT, 2008Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games (Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA)
19.
FranzkeSMenzelF, 2010, “Usability Test des Spiels B3 mit Senioren”, bachelor thesis, Computer-based Methods in Urban and Regional Planning, HafenCity University Hamburg
20.
GeeJ P, 2003What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy (Palgrave Macmillan, New York)
21.
GilmoreJ B, 1971, “Play: A special behavior”, in Children's Play Eds HerronR ESutton-SmithB (John Wiley, New York) pp 311–325
22.
GoodchildM F, 2007, “Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography”GeoJournal69211–221
23.
GordonEManosevitchE, 2010, “Augmented deliberation: Merging physical and virtual interaction to engage communities in urban planning”New Media and Society13(1) 75–95
24.
GordonESchirraS, 2012, “Playing with empathy: Digital role-playing games in public meetings”, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (ACM, New York) pp 179–185
25.
GordonESchirraSHollanderJ, 2011, “Immersive planning: A conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design38505–519
26.
HabermasJ, 1981The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
27.
HollanderJ B, 2011, “Approaching an ideal: Using technology to apply collaborative rationality to urban planning processes”Planning Practice and Research26587–596
28.
HuizingaJ, 1955Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
29.
InnesJBooherD, 2010Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon)
30.
JankowskiPNyergesT, 2001Geographic Information Systems for Group Decision Making (Taylor and Francis, London)
31.
KingstonRCarverSEvansATurtonI, 1999, “Virtual decision making in spatial planning: Web-based geographical information systems for public participation in environmental decision making”, http://www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/papers/99-9/index.html
32.
KingstonRCarverSEvansATurtonI, 2000, “Web-based public participation geographical information systems: An aid to local environmental decision-making”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems24109–125
33.
KrekA, 2005, “Rational ignorance of the citizens in public participatory planning”, in Proceedings of the CORP 2005, International Symposium Vienna, 19–21 May, pp 557–564, http://www.corp.at
LangP J, 1993, “Looking at pictures: Affective, fascial, visceral, and behavioral reactions”Psychophysiology30261–273
36.
LangP J, 1995, “The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention”American Psychologist50372–385
37.
LarsenR JDienerE, 1992, “Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion”Review of Personality and Social Psychology1325–59
38.
LemkeJ L, 1998, “Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media”, in Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-typographic World Eds ReinkingDLabboLMcKennaMKieferR (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) pp 283–301
39.
LiebermanN, 1977Playfulness: The Relationship to Imagination and Creativity (Academic Press, New York)
PicklesJ, 1995, “Representations in an electronic age: Geography, GIS, and democracy”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ (Guilford Press, New York) pp 1–30
42.
PineBGimlmoreJ H, 1999The Experience Economy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA)
43.
PodleschnyN, 2008, “Playing urban sustainability: The ecology of a simulation game”, in Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer—Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat (OZCHI '08) (ACM, New York) pp 231–234, http://doi.acm.org/210.1145/1517744.1517749
44.
PolsonDMorganC, 2010, “The 10% rule: Maximising learning through collaborative game design”, in Proceedings of IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning 2010 Eds SanchezArnedillo IIsaíasP (IADIS Press, Porto) pp 197–204
45.
PoplinA, 2011, “Games and serious games in urban planning: Study cases”, in Computational Science and its Applications—ICCSA2011, Part II Eds MurganteBGervasiOIglesiasATanierDApduhanB O (Springer, Berlin), pp 1–14
46.
PoplinA, 2012, “Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems36(3) 195–206
47.
RavajaNSaariTSalminenMLaarniJKallinenK, 2006, “Phasic emotional reactions to video game events: A psychophysiological investigation”Media Psychology8343–367
48.
RinnerC, 1999, “Argumentation maps—GIS-based discussion support for online planning”, GMD Research Series 2, German National Research Center for Information Technology, Sankt Augustin
49.
RitterfeldUCodyMVordererP (Eds), 2009Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects (Routledge, New York)
50.
SchroederP, 1996, “Report on Public Participation GIS Workshop”, TR 96–97, Scientific Report for Initiative 19 Specialist Meeting, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
51.
SieberR E, 2003, “Public participation geographic information systems across borders”The Canadian Geographer47 pp 50–61
SteinmannRKrekABlaschkeT, 2005, “Can online map-based applications improve citizen participation?”, in E-government: Towards Electronic Democracy Eds BöhlenMGamperJPolasekW (Springer, Berlin) pp 25–35
54.
SuiD Z, 2008, “The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of GIS”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems321–5
55.
SuitsB, 1990Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia (David R Godine, Boston, MA)
56.
SweetsterP and WyethP, 2005, “GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games”ACM Computers and Environment3(3) 1–24
