The idea of ‘place’ has long been central to the planning and design practice. Recent trends illustrate increased intervention in the ‘experience’ and ‘feeling’ of places, in order to influence and enhance community dynamics. While place-making is an important tool for experts to utilize in community planning, it should be accompanied by a thorough understanding of the contemporary social dynamics of place and the implications it has for the people who inhabit these places. In this sense, participatory planning forms an integral part of future place-making processes and planning thereof. In this paper, the first aim is to capture the importance of incorporating public perspective into the place-making process when considering future urban planning. The second is to stress the importance of the creative participatory processes to attract stakeholders and enhance their willingness to partake in the participatory planning processes. The third aim is to identify creative participatory planning tools that can be used to enhance participatory planning within the place-making process.
CilliersE JDiemontEStobbelaarD JTimmermansW, 2010The Workbench Method Report (Value Added Planning, Volume 2) part of the VALUE project, INTERREG IVB North-West Europe, European Regional Development Fund, European Territorial Corporation, 2007–2013, Wageningen University of Applied Sciences
9.
CilliersE JDiemontEStobbelaarD JTimmermansW, 2011, “Sustainable green urban planning: The workbench spatial quality method”. Journal of Place Management and Development4214–224
10.
CilliersE JTimmermansWVan den GoorberghFSlijkhuisJ S A, 2012Lively Cities Background Document: LICI Theory and Planning Approaches, part of the LICI project (Lively Cities, reclaiming public space for public use), made possible by INTERREG IVB North-West Europe, European Regional Development Fund, Wageningen University of Applied Sciences, Van Hall Larenstein
11.
CresswellT, 2004Place: A Short Introduction (Blackwell, Malden, MA)
12.
CurtisSJonesRees I, 1998, “Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality?”The Sociology of Health and Illness2085–112
13.
DauvallierP, 2009, “Werkbank ruimtelijke kwaliteit, praktische hulp bij structuuvisies en gebiedsprocessen”Ruimtelijke Ordening2622–30
GehlJ, 2004bTowards a Fine City for People: Public Spaces and Public Life—London 2004Transport for London and Central Partnership, London
20.
Habiforum, 2005, “Werkbank Ruimtelijke Kwaliteit. Handleiding voor de start van een, creatief process”, http://edepot/wur.nl/163540
21.
Holt-JensenA, 1999Geography, History and Concepts (Sage, London)
22.
KaliskiJ, 2006, “Democracy takes command: The new community planning and the challenge to urban design”Urban Planning Today Ed. SaundersW S (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) chapter 3
23.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford)
24.
LoudierCDuBoisJ L, 2003Safety and Public Spaces: The Role of Urban Planning (IAURIF, Paris)
25.
LyndonD (Ed.), 1983PLACES: A Forum of Environmental DesignVolumes 1–16, College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, CA
26.
MalpasJ E, 1999Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
27.
MartinD, 2003, “‘Place-framing’ as place-making: Constituting a neighborhood for organizing and activism”Annals of the Association of American Geographers93730–750
28.
NørgaardHBørresenS, 2010Urban Space for Everyone: Conclusions and RecommendationsThe Danish Crime Prevention Council and the Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University
29.
OverbeekGBogaardtM JVaderJ, 2009Burgers en Overheid Samenwerkend voor Landschap Local Ownership in de Praktijk Rapport 2009–002, Projectcode LEI, 21076, Den Haag, http://www.edepot.wur.nl/2207
ShibleyLSchneeklothR, 2000, “Implacing architecture into the practice of placemaking”Journal of Architectural Education53130–140
38.
SoholtH, 2004, “Life, spaces and buildings—turning the traditional planning process upside down”, paper presented to Walk21—V Cities for People, The Fifth International Conference on Walking in the 21st Century, 9–11 June, Copenhagen
39.
SojaE W, 1996Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-And-Imagined Places (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA)
VallanceSPerkinsH CMooreK, 2005, “The results of making a city more compact: Neighbours' interpretation of urban infill”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32715–733
43.
ZukinS, 1995The Cultures of Cities (Blackwell, Oxford)
