In this paper we argue that large cities can benefit from higher levels of adoption of ICT (information and communication technology) among the population. We develop an analytical framework permitting the analysis, assessment, and comparison of urban ICT-adoption stimulation policies. The frame is applied to four types of ICT-adoption policy, pursued in different European cities: The Hague, Eindhoven, Helsinki, and Manchester. We conclude that adoption policies can be justified for a number of reasons, and may contribute to urban development in several respects. However, in many cases, policies lack effectiveness because crucial factors that determine ICT adoption are not taken into account. Also, in too many cases, public policies interfere with market initiatives. On the basis of our case studies, we conclude that the most effective policies are not only problem driven but are also opportunity based and integrated: this includes infrastructure provision, content development, and resource building among low-adoptive groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AblerR, 1977, “The telephone and the evolution of the American metropolitan system”, in The Social Impact of the Telephone Ed. de Sola PoolI (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 318–341
2.
AdamsDNelsonRToddP A, 1992, “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A Replication”Management Information Systems Quarterly16(2) 227–247
3.
AllesPEsparzaALucasS, 1994, “Telecommunications and the large city–small city divide: Evidence from Indiana cities”The Professional Geographer46307–316
4.
BealG MBohlenJ M, 1955, “How farm people accept new ideas”, report 15, Ames: Iowa Co-operative Extension Service, Ames, IA
5.
BresnahanT FBrynjolfssonEHittL M, 1999, “Information technology, workplace organisation and the demand for skilled labor: firm level evidence” WP 7136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
6.
CastellsM, 1996The Rise of the Network Society The Information Age: Economy Society and Culture, Volume 1 (Blackwell, Oxford)
7.
CastellsM, 1999, “The informational city is a dual city: Can it be reversed?”, in High Technology and Low-income Communities: Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology Eds SchönD ASanyalBMitchellW J (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 25–42
DavisF D, 1993, “User acceptance of new technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts”Man Machines Studies38475–487
10.
De Volkskrant2000, “Kenniswijk komt in Eindhoven en Helmond” [Knowledge neighbourhoods in Eindhoven and Helmond], 14 July, page 5
11.
ForresterT, 1993Silicon Samurai: How Japan Conquered the World Information Technology Industry (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA)
12.
GrahamS, 1998, “The end of geography or the explosion of space? Conceptualising space, place and information technology”Progress in Human Geography2165–185
13.
GrahamSMarvinS, 1996Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places (Routledge, New York)
14.
HallP, 1998Cities in Civilization: Culture, Innovation and Urban Order (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London)
15.
HandyC, 1994The Empty Raincoat: Making Sense of the Future (Hutchinson, London)
16.
ITU, 1995World Telecommunication Development Report 1995 International Telecommunication Union, www.itu.int
17.
KlingRGersonE M, 1977, “The social dynamics of technical innovation in the computing world”Symbolic Interaction11132–146
18.
KnightR V, 1995, “Knowledge based development: Policy and planning implications for cities”Urban Studies32225–260
19.
Lasipalatsin Mediakeskus Ltd, 1999Annual Report Urban Pilot Lasipalatsi 1999Lasipalatsin Mediakeskus Ltd, Mannerheimintie 22–24, 00100 Helsinki
20.
MitchellW J, 1999, “Equitable access to the online world”, in High Technology and Low-income Communities: Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology Eds SchönD ASanyalBMitchellW J (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 105–130
21.
NooteboomB, 1990Innovatie en diffusie: meting en interpretatie [Innovation and diffusion: measurement and interpretation], Yearbook 90–91, (Nederlandse vereniging van marktonderzoeckers, Amsterdam)
22.
RogersE M, 1995Diffusion of Innovations4th edition (The Free Press, New York)
23.
SanyalBSchönD A, 1999, “Information technology and urban poverty: The role of public policy”, in High Technology and Low-income Communities. Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology Eds SchönD ASanyalBMitchellW J (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 371–394
24.
SassenS, 1994Cities in a World Economy (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
25.
SchmandtJWilliamsFWilsonRStroverS, 1990The New Urban Infrastructure: Cities and Telecommunications (Praeger, New York)
26.
ShieldsPDervinBRichterCSollerR, 1993, “Who needs POTS-plus services? A comparison of residential user needs along the rural-urban continuum”Telecommunications Policy17563–587
27.
SCP, 2000, “Digitalisering van de leefwereld: een onderzoek naar informatie- en communicatietechnologie en sociale ongelijkheid” [Digitalisation of daily life: on information and communication technologies and social inequality] (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag)
28.
StorperM, 1996, “The world of the city: local relations in a global economy”, mimeo, School of Public Policy and Social Research, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
29.
SwyngedouwE, 1993, “Communication, mobility and the struggle for power over space”, in Transport and Communications in the New Europe Eds GiannopoulosGGillespieA (Belhaven Press, London) pp 306–325
30.
The Economist2000, “Government and the Internet: haves and have-nots”, 24 June
31.
ThriftN, 1996, “New urban eras and old technological fears: Reconfiguring the goodwill of electronic things”Urban Studies81463–1493
32.
van den BergL, 1987Urban Systems in a Dynamic Society (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
33.
van den BergLvan WindenW, 2000, “ICT as potential catalyst for sustainable urban development”, European Institute for Comparative Urban Research, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
34.
van den BergLBraunEvan der MeerJ, 1997Metropolitan Organising Capacity (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
35.
van den BergLBraunEOtgaarA H J, 2000, “City and Enterprise: corporate social responsibility in European and US cities”, European Institute for Comparative Urban Research, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
36.
van RijsseltR T JWeijersT C M, 1997Ouderen en de informatiesamenleving: een verkenning van opvattingen over aansluiting en uitsluiting” [Elderly in the information age: an exploration of ideas on connection and exclusion], WP 60, Rathenau Instituut, Koninginnegracht 56, 2508 CE The Hague
37.
van WindenW, 2000, “ICT clusters in European cities: the cases of Helsinki, Manchester and the Hague”, paper presented at the 40th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Barcelona; copy available from the author
