Two of the major tasks of government are representing the interests of citizens and making budgetary allocations for the provision of public goods and services. In the United States of America, these two tasks are interdependent and both have a territorial base; elected members represent particular parts of the country and, in performing their representational role, advance the interests of the people living in the areas they represent. The result, according to both popular and academic theory, is pork-barrel politics, whereby representatives seek to direct a substantial portion of that part of the budget under their control to the benefits of their constituents. Academic analyses seeking the consequent geographical element to federal spending in the USA have failed in general however to substantiate that hypothesis. In this paper, I review that literature and suggest reasons for the failures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACIR, 1980Regional Growth: Historic PerspectiveAdvisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
2.
AntonT J, 1980, “Outlays data and the analysis of federal policy impact” in The Urban Impacts of Federal Policies Ed. GlickmanN J, (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 121–150
3.
AntonT JCawleyJ PKramerK L, 1980Moving Money: An Empirical Analysis of Federal Expenditure Patterns (Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Ham, Cambridge, MA)
4.
ArcherJ C, 1979, “Incrementalism and federal outlays among states”Geographical Perspectives445–14
5.
ArcherJ C, 1980, “Congressional-incumbent reelection success and federal-outlays distribution”Environment and Planning A12263–277
6.
ArcherJ C, 1981, “Public choice paradigms in political geography” in Political Studies from Spatial Perspectives Eds BurnetA DTaylorP J, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 73–90
7.
ArcherJ CTaylorP J, 1981Section and Party: A Political Geography of American Presidential Elections from Andrew Jackson to Ronald Reagan (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
8.
ArnoldR D, 1979Congress and the Bureaucracy (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
9.
ArnoldR D, 1981a, “Legislators, bureaucrats and locational decisions”Public Choice37107–132
10.
ArnoldR D, 1981b, “The local roots of domestic policy” in The New Congress Eds MannEOrsteinN J, (American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC) pp 250–287
11.
Associated Press, 1981, “Civil war, 1981 style”Valley News 23 April issue, p 7
12.
BahlR WWarfordJ J, 1971, “Interstate distribution of benefits from the Federal budgetary process”National Tax Journal24169–176
BennettR J, 1980The Geography of Public Finance (Methuen, London)
15.
BlackD, 1958The Theory of Committees and Elections (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
16.
BretonA, 1965, “A theory of government grants”Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science31175–187
17.
BrowningC E, 1971, “Uncle Sam in the South: Federal outlays to Southern states”Southeastern Geographer1162–69
18.
BrowningC E, 1973The Geography of Federal OutlaysDepartment of Geography Monograph Series, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
19.
BrowningC E, 1981, “Federal outlays and regional development” in Federal and Regional Development Ed. HoffmanG W, (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX) pp 125–153
20.
BrunnS D, 1974Geography and Politics in America (Harper and Row, New York)
21.
BrunnS DHoffmanW L, 1969, “The geography of Federal Grants-In-Aid to states”Economic Geography45226–238
22.
BuchananJ MTullockJ, 1962The Calculus of Consent (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
23.
BurkheadJ, 1972, “Federalism and regional policy” in Spatial Regional and Population Economics Eds PerlamMLevenC JChinitzB, (Gordon and Breach, New York) pp 61–78
24.
CaraleyD, 1976, “Congressional politics and urban aid”Political Science Quarterly9119–45
25.
CFFRA, 1982, Consolidated Federal Funds Report Act of 1982 United States Statutes at Large, 97th Congress, 2nd Session (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) pp 1607–1610
26.
ChazeW LBarrRDudneyR S, 1983, “The $75 billion pork-barrel ripoff”US News and World Report94 2 May issue, pp 18–21
27.
ClotfelterJ, 1970, “Senate voting and constituency stake in defense spending”Journal of Politics32979–983
28.
CobbS, 1976, “Defense spending and defense voting in the House: An empirical study of an aspect of the military-industrial complex thesis”American Journal of Sociology82163–182
29.
CohenRE, 1981, “For the Gypsey Moths the goal is to change GOP policy, not bolt the party”National Journal 31 October issue, pp 1946–1949
30.
CoxK R, 1979Location and Public Problems (Maaroufa Press, Chicago, IL)
31.
DardenJ TTabachneckA S, 1980, “Algorithm 8: Graphic and mathematical descriptions of inequality, dissimilarity, segregation, or concentration”Environment and Planning A12227–234
DyeR T, 1975Understanding Public Policysecond edition (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
34.
ElazarD J, 1972American Federalism: A View from the Statessecond edition (Thomas Y Crowell, New York)
35.
FeldmanS, 1982, “Economic self-interest and political behavior”American Journal of Political Science26446–466
36.
FerejohnJ A, 1974Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947–1968 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
37.
FiorinaM P, 1977Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
38.
FiorinaM P, 1978, “Ecnomic retrospective voting in American national elections: A micro-analysis”American Journal of Political Science22426–443
39.
FoxW FReidJ N, 1980, “Interregional benefits from Federal spending: A new look at an old issue” in Taxing and Spending Policy Eds SamuelsW JWadeL L, (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 149–156
40.
GistJ R, 1982, “‘Stability’ and ‘competition’ in budgetary theory”American Political Science Review76859–872
41.
GrayCGregoryG W, 1968, “Military spending and Senate voting: A correlational study”Journal of Peace Research544–55
42.
GreenM JCalabreseMDarlingLRosenthalBFallowsJ MZwickD R, 1972Who Runs Congress? (Bantam Books, New York)
43.
HamiltonAJayJMadisonJ, 1937The Federalist (Modern Library, New York)
44.
HavemannJStanfieldR L, 1977, “A year later, the Frostbelt strikes back”National Journal 2 July issue, pp 1028–1037
45.
HibbingJ RAlfordJ R, 1981, “The electoral impact of economic conditions: Who is held responsible?”American Journal of Political Science25423–439
46.
HoggartK, 1981, “Social needs, political representation, and federal outlays in the East North Central United States of America”Environment and Planning A13531–546
47.
HolcombeR GZardkoohiA, 1983, “On the distribution of Federal taxes and expenditures, and the new War between the States”Public Choice40165–174
48.
HuntingtonE, 1945Mainsprings of Civilization (John Wiley, New York)
49.
IppolitoD S, 1981Congressional Spending (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
50.
IsaacsonW, 1983, “The winds of reform: Runaway weapons costs prompt a new look at military planning”Time121 7 March issue, pp 12–16, 23, 26–30
51.
JohannesJ RMcAdamsJ C, 1981, “The Congressional incumbency effect: Is it casework, policy compatibility, or something else? An examination of the 1978 election”American Journal of Political Science25512–541
52.
JohnstonR J, 1977, “The geography of Federal allocations in the United States: Preliminary tests of some hypotheses for political geography”Geoforum8319–326
53.
JohnstonR J, 1978a, “The allocation of Federal money in the United States: Aggregate analysis by correlation”Policy and Politics6279–278
54.
JohnstonR J, 1978b, “Congressional committees and the geography of Federal spending in the USA: The examples of NASA and the AEC”Area10272–278
55.
JohnstonR J, 1978c, “Political spending in the United States: Analyses of political influences on the allocation of Federal money to local environments”Environment and Planning A10691–704
56.
JohnstonR J, 1979a, “Congressional committees and the inter-state distribution of military spending”Geoforum10151–162
57.
JohnstonR J, 1979bPolitical, Electoral and Spatial Systems (Clarendon Press, London)
58.
JohnstonR J, 1980The Geography of Federal Spending in the United States of America (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
59.
KinderD RKiewietD R, 1979, “Economic discontent and political behavior: The role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in Congressional voting”American Journal of Political Science23495–527
60.
KingJ R, 1981, “NASA's reach on earth”Boston Sunday Globe 15 November issue, p 22
61.
KramerH K, 1971, “Short-term fluctuations in US voting behavior”American Political Science Review65131–143
62.
La FolletteC, 1982, “More growth and less Federal aid means new problems for rural areas”National Journal A September issue, pp 1515–1517
63.
McKeanR N, 1958Efficiency in Government through Systems Analysis with Emphasis on Water Resources Development (John Wiley, New York)
64.
MaleckiE J, 1982, “Federal R and D spending in the United States of America: Some impacts on metropolitan economies”Regional Studies1619–35
65.
MartisK C, 1982The Historical Atlas of United States Congressional Districts: 1789–1983 (Free Press, New York)
66.
MayhewD R, 1974Congress: The Electoral Connection (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
67.
MonroeK R, 1979, “Econometric analysis of electoral behavior: A critical review”Political Behavior1137–174
68.
MorrillR L, 1981Political Redistricting and Geographic Theory (Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC)
69.
MorrisonS ECommagerH S, 1962The Growth of the American Republicvolume 2 (Oxford University Press, New York)
70.
MoynihanD P, 1978, “The politics and economics of regional growth”The Public Interest513–21
71.
MurphyJ T, 1974, “The political parties and the porkbarrel: Party conflict and cooperation in the House Public Works Committee decision making”American Political Science Review68169–185
72.
MushkinS, 1956, “Statistical materials on the distribution of federal expenditures among states”; available in mimeograph form from the US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Division of Public Health Methods, 200 Independence Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20201, USA
73.
MushkinS, 1957, “Federal grants and federal expenditures”National Tax Journal10169–190
74.
NordhausW D, 1975, “The political business cycle”Review of Economic Studies42169–190
75.
OEO, 1972Federal Outlays in Summary, Fiscal Year 1972 (Office of Economic Opportunity, Washington, DC); copy available in microfiche or Xerox form from The National Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22151, USA
76.
PackJ R, 1982, “The States' scramble for Federal funds”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management1175–195
77.
PaldamM, 1981, “An essay on the rationality of economic policy: The test-case of electoral cycle”Public Choice37287–305
78.
PennockJ R, 1979Democratic Political Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
RayB A, 1980a, “Congressional promotion of district interests: Does power on the Hill really make a difference?” in Political Benefits Ed. RundquistB S, (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 1–25
81.
RayB A, 1980b, “Federal spending and the selection of committee assignments in the US House of Representatives”American Journal of Political Science24494–570
82.
ReesJ, 1980, “Government policy and industrial location in the United States” in Special Study on Economic Change, Volume 7. State and Local Finance: Adjustments in a changing EconomyJoint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) pp 128–179
83.
RittL G, 1976, “Committee position, seniority and the distribution of government expenditures”Public Policy24463–489
84.
RundquistB SGriffithD E, 1976, “An interrupted time-series test of the distributive theory of military policy-making”Western Political Quarterly29620–626
85.
SamuelsonP A, 1954, “The pure theory of public expenditure”Review of Economics and Statistics36387–389
86.
SamuelsonR J, 1981, “Budget mythology”National Journal 4 July issue, p 1216
87.
ShepsleKWeingastB, 1981, “Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice”Public Choice37503–519
88.
SmithH RHartJ F, 1955, “The American tariff map”Geographical Review55327–346
89.
SSIR, 1966Federal Expenditures to States and RegionsUnited States Senate Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC); copy available in microfiche or Xerox form from The National Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22151, USA
90.
SSIR, 1982Geographic Distribution of Federal FundsUS Senate Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
91.
StiglerG, 1973, “General economic conditions and national elections”American Economic Review63166–167
92.
StromG S, 1975, “Congressional policy making: A test of a theory”Journal of Politics37711–735
93.
TaylorP JJohnstonR J, 1979Geography of Elections (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
94.
TieboutC M, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424
95.
TufteE R, 1978Political Control of the Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
96.
TullockG, 1981, “Why so much stability”Public Choice37189–205
97.
TullockG, 1982, “The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics—comment”Journal of Political Economy90824–826
98.
TussingA DHenningJ A, 1974, “Long-run growth of nondefense government expenditures in the United States”Public Finance Quarterly2202–222
99.
US Bureau of the Census, 1964Statistical Abstract of the United States (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
100.
US Bureau of the Census, 1981Statistical Abstract of the United States (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
101.
US Bureau of the Census, 1983aFederal Expenditure by State for Fiscal Year 1981 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
102.
US Bureau of the Census, 1983bFederal Expenditure by State for Fiscal Year 1982 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
103.
US Bureau of the Census, various years Statistical Abstract of the United States (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
104.
WeingastB R, 1979, “A rational choice perspective on Congressional norms”American Journal of Political Science23245–262
105.
WeingastB RShepsleK AJohnsenC, 1981, “The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach”Journal of Political Economy89642–663
106.
WildavskyA, 1974The Politics of the Budgetary Processsecond edition (Little, Brown, Boston, MA)
107.
WohlenbergE H, 1976, “Public assistance effectiveness by states”Annals of the Association of American Geographers66440–450
