The authors discuss the regulation of rural land use and compensation for property-rights restrictions, both of which appear to have become more commonplace in recent years but also more contested. The implications of contemporary theories in relation to this matter are examined, including: the applicability of new welfare economics; the relevance of the neoclassical theory of politics; and the implications of contemporary theories of social conflict resolution and communication. Examination of examples of Swiss and Australian regulation of the use of rural properties, and the ensuing conflicts, reveals that many decisions reflect a mixture of these elements. Rarely, if ever, are social decisions in this area made solely on the basis of welfare economics, for instance social cost-benefit analysis. Only some aspects of such decisions can be explained by the neoclassical theory of politics. Theories of social conflict resolution suggest why, and in what way, approaches of discourse and participation may resolve conflicts regarding regulation and compensation. These theories and their practical application seem to gain in importance as opposition to government decisions increases. The high degree of complexity of most conflicts concerning regulation and compensation cannot be tackled with narrow economic theories. Moreover, the Swiss and Australian examples show that approaches involving conflict resolution may favour environmental standards.
ArrowKJ, 1951Social Choice and Individual Values (John Wiley, New York)
5.
BackhouseR, 1985A History of Modern Economic Analysis (Blackwell, Oxford)
6.
BaughmanM, 1995, “Mediation, fairness and competence in citizen participation”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Eds RennOWeblerTWiedemannP (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 253265
7.
BinswangerHC, 1977Die europäische Agrarpolitik vor neuen Alternativen [The European agriculture policy faced with new alternatives] (Haupt, Bern)
8.
BouldingKE, 1962Conflict and Defense, A General Theory (University Press of America, Lanham, MD)
9.
CoaseRS, 1960, “The problem of social cost”Journal of Law and Economics3(5) 144
Dahl-TacconiNTaylorP, 2000, “Marine conservation through collaboration and partnership; recent Australian experiences”, in Biodiversity and Ecological Economics. Participation, Values and Resource Management Ed. TacconiL (Earthscan, Publications, London) pp 116132
12.
DargavelJProctorWKanowskiP, 2000, “Conflict and agreement in Australian forests”, in Biodiversity and Ecological Economics. Participation, Values and Resource Management Ed. TacconiL (Earthscan Publications, London) pp 101115
13.
DawesRMvan de KragtAJCOrbellJM, 1990, “Cooperation for the benefit of us—not me, or my conscience”, in Beyond Self-interest Ed. MansbridgeJJ (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 97110
14.
DeSarioJLangtonS, 1987Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT)
15.
DickieP, 2000, “Death by a thousand cuts”The Courier Mail 14 July, page 19
16.
DienelPCRennO, 1995, “Planning cells: A gate to ‘fractal’ mediation”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Eds RennOWeblerTWiedemannP (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 117140
17.
DownsA, 1957An Economic Theory of Democracy (Harper and Row, New York)
18.
DownsA, 1972, “Up and down with ecology—the ‘issue-attention cycle’”Public Interest283850
19.
DragunAK, 1999, “Property rights, ‘takings’ and environmental management”International Journal of Social Economics2610611077
20.
DZV, 1999Verordnung über die Direktzahlungen an die Landwirtschaft [Regulation for direct payments to agriculture] 19 January 1999, SR 910.13, Bern
21.
EtzioniA, 1988The Moral Dimension, Toward a New Economics (The Free Press, New York)
22.
FehrETyranJR, 1997, “Institutions and reciprocal fairness”Nordic Journal of Political Economy23133144
23.
FiorinoD, 1995, “Regulatory negotiation as a form of public participation”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Eds RennOWeblerTWiedemannP (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 223237
24.
FreyBS, 1978Modern Political Economy (John Wiley, New York)
25.
FreyBS, 1994, “Direct democracy: Politico-economic lessons from Swiss experience”The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings84338342
26.
FreyBSBohnetI, 1995, “Institutions affect fairness: Experimental investigations”Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschafts151286303
27.
Georgescu-RoegenN, 1954, “Choice, expectations and measurability”Quarterly Journal of Economics68503534
28.
GintisH, 2000Game Theory Evolving (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
29.
HabermasJ, 1984The Theory of Communicative Action (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
30.
HirschmanAO, 1970Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
31.
KahnemanDKnetschJLThalerR, 1986, “Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market”The American Economic Review76728741
32.
KaltJPZupanMA, 1984, “Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics”The American Economic Review74279300
33.
KestingS, 1998, “A potential for understanding and the interference of power: Discourse as an economic mechanism of coordination”Journal of Economic Issues3210531078
34.
KurzRVolkertJHelbigJ, 1996, “Nachhaltigkeitspolitik: Ordnungspolitische Konsequenzen und Durchsetzbarkeit” [Policy of sustainability: Consequences for regulatory policy and enforcement], in Ordnungspolitische Grundfragen einer Politik der Nachhaltigkeit [Basic regulatory question of a policy of sustainability] Ed. GerkenL (Nomos, Baden-Baden) pp 115165
LittleIMD, 1957A Critique of Welfare Economics2nd edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
37.
LockeJ, 1960Two Treatises of Government: A Critical Edition with an Introduction Apparatus Criticus revised and edited by LaslettP (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
38.
LynnFMKartezJD, 1995, “The redemption of citizen advisory committees: A perspective from critical theory”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Eds RennOWeblerTWiedemannP (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 87101
39.
McCloskeyDN, 1994Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
40.
MacDonaldK, 2000, “Wood for the trees”The Weekend Australian 15–16 July, page 27
41.
MarwellGAmesRE, 1981, “Economists free ride, does anyone else?”Journal of Public Economics15295310
42.
NiskanenWA, 1971Bureaucracy and Representative Government (Aldine, Chicago, IL)
OlsonM, 1965The Logic of Collective Action, Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
45.
PenningtonM, 2000, “Public choice theory and the politics of urban containment: Voter-centred versus special-interest explanations”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18145162
46.
PolaskySDoremusHRettigB, 1997, “Endangered species conservation on private land”Contemporary Economic Policy15(4) 6676
47.
RennO, 1996, “Möglichkeiten und Grenzen diskursiver Verfahren bei umweltrelevanten Planungen: Kooperation, Netzwerk, Selbstorganisation” [Possibilities and limits of discursive procedures in environmentally relevant planning: Cooperation, networks, self-organisation], in Elemente demokratischen Wirtschaftens [Elements of democratic economics] Eds BieseckerAGrenzdörfferK (Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft, Pfaffenweiler) pp 161197
48.
RennOWeblerTWiedemannP, 1995Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
49.
RiederPPhan-HuyAnwander S, 1994Grundlagen der Agrarmarktpolitik [Basics of agricultural market policy] (vdf Hochschulverlag, Zürich)
50.
RippeKPSchaberP, 1999, “Democracy and environmental decision-making”Environmental Values8(1) 7588
51.
RothschildKW, 1993Ethics and Economic Theory (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants)
52.
SalhoferKHofreitherMFSinabellF, 2000, “Promotion of agricultural sector and political power in Austria”Public Choice102229246
53.
SamuelsonPA, 1950, “Evaluation of real national income”Oxford Economic Papers2(1) 129
54.
SchelskeO, 2000Die Bedeutung der Biodiversität und Bestandteile einer Strategie zu ihrem Schutz—eine regionalökonomische und ökologische Perspektive [The significance of biodiversity and strategic elements for its protection—a regional economic and ecological perspective] Schriftenreihe Wirtschaftsgeographie und Raumplanung des Geographischen Instituts der Universität Zürich, Zürich
55.
SchelskeOSeidlI, 2000, “Kompensation als Instrument zum Erhalt von Arten-und Landschaftsvielfalt: Ökonomische Grundlagen und Fallbeispiele” [Compensation—an instrument to protect species and landscape diversity. Economic basics and case studies] Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht12348
56.
SchramA, 2000, “Sorting out the seeking: The economics of individual motivations”Public Choice103231258
57.
ScitovskyT, 1941, “A note on welfare propositions in economics”Review of Economic Studies97788
58.
ScitovskyT, 1942, “A reconsideration of the theory of tariffs”Review of Economic Studies989110
59.
SimonHA, 1955, “A behavioural model of rational choice”Quarterly Journal of Economics79 (August) 98118
60.
StroupRL, 1997, “The economics of compensating property owners”Contemporary Economic Policy155565
61.
The Economist1996, “Full democracy”, 21 December, pages 314
62.
TisdellCA, 1982Microeconomics of Markets (John Wiley, Brisbane)
63.
TisdellCA, 1991Economics of Environmental Conservation (Elsevier, Amsterdam)
64.
TisdellCA, 1999, “Australian environmental issues: An overview”Asia Pacific Journal on Environment and Development6(1) 116
65.
TisdellCHarrisonS, 1999, “Compensation for taking of natural resource interests: Principles and practices in recent Queensland cases”Australian Journal of Environmental Management6917
66.
TullockG, 1987, “Public choice”, in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics Eds EatwellJMilgateMNewmanP (Macmillan, New York) pp 10401044
67.
van WindenF, 1999, “On the economic theory of interest groups: Towards a group frame of reference in political economics”Public Choice100129
WeblerTRennO, 1995, “A brief primer on participation: Philosophy and practice”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Eds RennOWeblerTWiedemannP (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 1733
