Globalisation has been accompanied by an equally global tendency towards devolution of authority and resources from nation-states to regions and localities that takes on various forms, depending upon which actors are driving the decentralisation efforts. The existence of a general trend towards devolution also has significant implications for efficiency, equity, and administration. The authors outline first the general drive towards devolution and then proceed to examine which countries are experiencing which forms of decentralisation. A theoretical argument emphasising the role of governmental legitimacy across various tiers of government is used to explain the diversity of devolution initiatives, drawing on examples that include Brazil, Mexico, India, China, the USA, and some European countries. Having supported their model of decentralisation, the authors then examine the implications of the widespread downward transfer of power towards regions. Some of the less widely discussed pitfalls of decentralisation are presented; caution in promoting devolutionary efforts is the prescription of this paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 2000, “From the political economy of regions to regional political economy”Progress in Human Geography24101–110
2.
AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM, 2000, “Spatial dimensions and institutional uncertainties of planning and the ‘new regionalism’”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18711–726
3.
AspinallEBergerM T, 2001, “The break-up of Indonesia? Nationalisms after decolonisation and the limits of the nation-state in post-cold war Southeast Asia”Third World Quarterly221003–1024
4.
BagchiABajajJ LByrdW, (Eds), 1992State Finances in India (Vikas, New Delhi)
5.
BahlR, 1999Fiscal Policy in China (1990 Institute, San Francisco, CA)
6.
BennettR J, 1990Decentralization, Local Governments and Markets: Towards a Post-welfare Agenda (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
7.
BennettR J, 1997, “Administrative systems and economic spaces”Regional Studies31323–336
8.
BuiterW HPatelU R, 1997, “Solvency and fiscal correction in India”, in Public Finance: Policy Issues for India Ed. MundleS, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 30–75
9.
CastellsA, 2001, “The role of intergovernmental finance in achieving diversity and cohesion: The case of Spain”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19189–206
10.
CastellsM, 1996The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA)
11.
CheshireP CGordonI, 1996, “Territorial competition and the predictability of collective (in)action”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20383–400
12.
CheshireP CGordonI, 1998, “Territorial competition: Some lessons for policy”Annals of Regional Science32321–346
13.
CoutinhoM, 1996, “The Brazilian fiscal system in the 1990s: Equity and efficiency under inflationary conditions”, RP 41, Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London, London
14.
Da-DaoLSitV, 2001, “China's regional development policies: A review”, in China's Regional Disparities: Issues and Policies Eds SitVDa-DaoL, (Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY) pp 19–37
15.
DiamantiI, 1993La Lega: Geografia, Storia e Sociologia di un Nuovo Soggetto Politico (Donzelli, Rome)
16.
DickenP, 1998Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy3rd edition (Guilford Press, New York)
17.
DillingerWWebbS B, 1999, “Fiscal management in federal democracies: Argentina and Brazil”, Policy Research Working Paper 2121, World Bank, Washington, DC
18.
DonahueJ D, 1997Disunited States (HarperCollins, New York)
GrayJ, 1998False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism (Granta Books, London)
21.
GuigaleM MWebbS B, 2000Achievements and Challenges of Fiscal Decentralisation: Lessons from Mexico (World Bank, Washington, DC)
22.
HagopianF, 1996Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
23.
HatryH, 1994, “Accountability for service quality, performance measurement and closeness to customs”, in Local Government and Market Decentralisation Ed. BennettR J, (United Nations University Press, Tokyo) pp 163–181
24.
IMF, various years Government Finance Statistics (International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC)
25.
ICSO, 1999Statistical Abstract of India (Indian Central Statistical Organisation, Delhi)
26.
JonesM, 2001, “The rise of the regional state in economic governance: ‘partnerships for prosperity’ or new scales of state power?”Environment and Planning A331185–1211
27.
KraemerM, 1997, “Intergovernmental transfers and political representation: Empirical evidence from Argentina, Brazil and Mexico”, WP 345, Inter-American Development Bank, 1300 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20577
28.
KeatingM, 1998The New Regionalism in Western Europe (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA)
29.
KeatingM, 1999, “Asymmetrical government: Multinational states in an integrating Europe”Publius Journal of Federalism1971–87
30.
LeeP K, 2000, “Into the trap of strengthening state capacity: China's tax assignment reform”The China Quarterly1641008–1024
31.
LitvackJAhmadJBirdR, 1998Sector Studies Series 21491: Rethinking Decentralisation in Developing Countries (World Bank, Washington, DC)
32.
MaJ, 1996Intergovernmental Relations and Economic Management in China (St Martin's Press, New York)
33.
McKenneyK I, 1993, “An assessment of China's special economic zones”, The Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defence University, Washington, DC
34.
MarkusenA, 1994, “American federalism and regional policy”International Regional Science Review163–15
35.
MasseyD, 1999, “Power-geometrics and the politics of space–time”, Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
36.
MilgromPRobertsJ, 1992Economics, Organisation and Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
37.
MonteroA P, 2000, “Devolving democracy? Political decentralisation and the New Brazilian Federalism”, in Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions and Processes Eds KingstoneP RPowerT J, (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA)
38.
MonteroA P, 2001, “Decentralizing democracy: Spain and Brazil in comparative perspective”Comparative Politics33149–172
39.
MorganK, 2002, “The English question: Regional perspectives on a fractured nation”Regional Studies36797–810
40.
MytelkaL K, 2000, “Location tournaments for FDI: Inward investment into Europe in a global world”, in The Globalization of Multinational Enterprise Activity and Economic Development Eds HoodNYoungS, (Macmillan, London) pp 278–302
41.
OatesW E, 1972Fiscal Federalism (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York)
42.
OffnerP, 1999Medicaid and the States: A Century Foundation Report (Century Foundation Press, New York)
43.
DiazV Pérez, 1990, “Governability and the scale of governance: Mesogovernments in Spain”, WP 1990/6, Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Madrid
44.
PhelpsN ATewdwr-JonesM, 2001, “Globalisation, regions and the state: Exploring the limitations of economic modernisation through inward investment”Urban Studies381253–1272
45.
PingX, 2000, “The evolution of Chinese fiscal decentralisation and the impacts of tax reform in 1994”Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics41179–191
46.
PowersE T, 1999, “Block granting welfare: Fiscal impact on the states”, OP23, Urban Institute, Washington, DC
47.
Prud'hommeR, 1994, “On the dangers of decentralization”, WP-1252, World Bank, Washington, DC
48.
Prud'hommeR, 1995, “The dangers of decentralization”World Bank Research Observer10201–220
49.
PutnamR J, 1993Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
50.
RBI, 2000, “State finances: A study of budgets of 1999–2000”, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai
51.
RoddenJ, 2002a, “The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world”American Journal of Political Science46670–687
RodríguezV E, 1998, “Recasting federalism in Mexico”Publius Journal of Federalism28235–254
54.
Rodríguez-PoseA, 1996, “Growth and institutional change: The influence of the Spanish regionahsation process on economic performance”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1471–87
55.
Rodríguez-PoseA, 1998Dynamics of Regional Growth in Europe: Social and Political Factors (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
56.
Rodríguez-PoseA, 2002The European Union: Economy Society and Polity (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
57.
Rodríguez-PoseAArbixG, 2001, “Strategies of waste: Bidding wars in the Brazilian automobile sector”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25134–154
58.
SchramS FSossJ, 1998, “Making something out of nothing: Welfare reform and a new race to the bottom”Publius Journal of Federalism2867–88
59.
ScottA J, 1998Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition, and Political Order (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
60.
ShahA, 1991, “The new fiscal federalism in Brazil”, DP 124, World Bank, Washington, DC
61.
SharmaS D, 1999Development and Democracy in India (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO)
62.
SouzaC, 1997Constitutional Engineering in Brazil: The Politics of Federalism and Decentralization (Macmillan, London)
63.
StorperM, 1997The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy (Guilford Press, New York)
64.
SuryM M, 1998Fiscal Federalism in India (Indian Tax Institute, Delhi)
65.
TanziV, 1996, “Fiscal federalism and decentralization: A review of some efficiency and macroeconomic aspects”, in Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics (World Bank, Washington, DC) pp 295–316
66.
ThompsonC, 1989, “Federal expenditure-to-revenue ratios in the United States of America, 1971–85: An exploration of spatial equity under the ‘new federalism’”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy7445–470
67.
TomaneyJ, 2000, “End of the empire state? New labour and devolution in the United Kingdom”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24675–688
68.
TomaneyJWardN, 2000, “England and the ‘new regionalism’”Regional Studies34471–478
69.
VernonR, 1998In the Hurricane's Eye: The Troubled Prospects of Multinational Enterprises (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
70.
WardP MRodriguezV E, 1999, “New federalism and state government in Mexico: Bringing the states back in”, AS–Mexican Policy Report 9, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
71.
YiLChushengL, 2001, “The tax division scheme: Central–local financial relations in the 1990s”, in China's Regional Disparities: Issues and Policies Eds SitVDa-DaoL, (Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY) pp 85–104
