Abstract
The authors suggest that a more interpretist analysis of policy design, development, and implementation that takes into account antecedent factors, context, reflective change, and user and advisor perception and expectations would make a significant contribution to the field of policy evaluation. This concept is considered further using a qualitative assessment of the West Midlands response, Mustard.UK.Com (Mustard), to the government's High Growth Start-Up scheme set out in the Department of Trade and Industry's Competitiveness White Paper in 1998. The assessment has three elements: first, an exploration of the extant literature to identify any relevant antecedent factors that may have informed or influenced the decisionmaking process when the West Midlands response was being developed; second, a review of the procedure by which the various parties involved in the implementation of Mustard created a framework within which a workable support programme could be delivered; third, the extent to which Mustard has been successful in meeting the objectives of those stakeholders involved in the programme is considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.