In vogue with the international currents of public management, the United Kingdom's New Labour government sees the outsourcing, or externalisation, of public service delivery as a key instrument of performance improvement. Evidence suggests, however, that a significant proportion of local authorities are reluctant to externalise. On the basis of fifty interviews in six case-study authorities, the author identifies five reasons for a reluctance to externalise. He further considers the degree of theoretical support for this reluctance, concluding that gaps in our knowledge—critical to ‘make or buy’ decisions—make it impossible to determine whether a reluctance to externalise is well founded or not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderMYoungD, 1996, “Strategic outsourcing”Long Range Planning29116–119
2.
AtkinsonJ, 1984, “Manpower strategies for flexible organisations”Personnel Management1628–31
3.
Audit Commission, 1st Floor, Millbank Tower, London SW1P 4HQ
4.
2001Changing Gear: Best Value Annual Statement
5.
2002Competitive Procurement
6.
2003Patterns for Improvement
7.
BaumolW JPanzarJ CWilligR D, 1982Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York)
8.
BillisDGlennersterH, 1998, “Human services and the voluntary sector: Towards a theory of comparative advantage”Journal of Social Policy2779–98
9.
BlairT, 1998Leading the Way: A New Vision for Local Government (Institute for Public Policy Research, London)
10.
BoyneG, 1998, “Bureaucratic theory meets reality: Public choice and service contacting in US local government”Public Administration Review58474–484
11.
BoyneG, 2002, “Public and private management: What's the difference?”Journal of Management Studies3997–122
12.
BoyneGJenkinsGPooleM, 1999, “Human resource management in public and private sectors: An empirical comparison”Public Administration77407–420
13.
BreretonMTempleM, 1999, “The new public service ethos: An ethnical environment for governance”Public Administration77455–474
14.
CohenS, 2001, “A strategic framework for devolving responsibility and functions from government to the private sector”Public Administration Review61432–440
15.
CPPP, 2001Building Better Partnerships Commission on Public Private Partnerships (Institute for Public Policy Research, London)
16.
DETR, 1999Local Government Act 1999: Part 1 Best ValueDepartment of Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
17.
DombergerS, 1998The Contracting Organization: A Strategic Guide to Outsourcing (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
18.
DombergerSMeadowcroftSThompsonD, 1986, “Competitive tendering and efficiency: The case of refuse collection”Fiscal Studies769–87
19.
DonahueJ D, 1989The Privatisation Decision: Public Ends and Private Means (Basic Books, New York)
20.
EntwistleTLaffinM, 2005, “A prehistory of best value”Local Government Studies31214–227
21.
GoldthorpeJ HLockwoodDBechhoferFPlattJ, 1969The Affluent Worker in the Class Structure (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
22.
Gould-WilliamsJ, 2003, “The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: A study of public-sector organizations”The International Journal of Human Resource Management1428–54
23.
HamelGPrahaladC K, 1994Competing for the Future (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA)
24.
HartO, 1995Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
25.
HefetzAWarnerM, 2004, “Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14171–190
26.
HolmstromBRobertsJ, 1998, “The boundaries of the firm revisited”The Journal of Economic Perspectives1273–94
27.
KaufmanH, 1977Are Government Organisations Immortal? (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
28.
KendallJ, 2001, “Of knights, knaves and merchants: The case of residential care for older people in England in the late 1990s”Social Policy and Administration35360–375
29.
MorganPAllingtonN, 2002, “Has the public sector retained its model employer status?”Public Money and Management2235–42
30.
ODPM, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 26 Whitehall, London SW1A 2WH
31.
2003aStrategic Partnering Taskforce: Rethinking Service Delivery
32.
2003bLocal Government Act 1999: Part 1 Best Value and Performance Improvement (The Stationery Office, London)
33.
2003cNational Procurement Strategy for Local Government
34.
2004Evaluation of the Long-term Impact of the Best Value Regime: First Interim Report
35.
OsborneDGaeblerT, 1992Reinventing Government (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
36.
OsborneS (Ed.), 2000Public—Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective (Routledge, London)
37.
PfefferJ, 1994Competitive Advantage through People (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA)
38.
PfefferJVeigaJ P, 1999, “Putting people first for organisational success”Academy of Management Executive1337–49
39.
PollertA, 1989, “‘The flexible firm’: Fixation or fact?”Work, Employment and Society2281–316
40.
PoppoLZengerT, 1998, “Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based and measurement explanations for make or buy decisions in information services”Strategic Management Journal19853–877
41.
PotterJWeatherellM, 1987Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour (Sage, London)
42.
PrahaladC KHamelG, 1990, “The core competence of the corporation”Harvard Business Review6879–91
43.
RidleyN, 1988The Local Right: Enabling Not Providing (Centre for Policy Studies, London)
44.
SorensenRBayA-H, 2002, “Competitive tendering in the welfare state: Perceptions and preferences among local politicians”Scandinavian Political Studies25357–384
45.
TrussC, 2001, “Complexities and controversies in linking HRM with organizational outcomes”Journal of Management Studies381121–1149
46.
WalshKDavisH, 1993Competition and Service: The Impact of the Local Government Act 1988 (HMSO, London)
47.
WilliamsonO E, 1975Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (The Free Press, New York)
48.
WilsonJ, 1999, “Compulsory competitive tendering and local government financial services: An analysis of the views of local government accountants in the North West of England”Public Administration77541–563
49.
ZengerTHesterlyW S, 1997, “The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high powered incentives, and molecular units”Organization Science8209–222
