The Local Government Act 2000 established the system of ‘overview and scrutiny’ in a majority of English local authorities. Ostensibly an attempt to transfer some of the features of the parliamentary/government decisionmaking process, the new system has not been able entirely to replace its predecessor. An analysis of three case-study county councils shows that they have adapted the overview and scrutiny system to existing political preferences, which owe much both to existing local government practice and to the prevailing cultures within the councils. Culture has influenced the structure of committees, their relationship to the executive, officer relationships, questioning, and use of the call-in function.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshworthR, 2003, “Toothless tigers? Councillor perceptions of local scrutiny committees in England and Wales”Local Government Studies29 (2) 1–18
2.
AshworthRSnapeS, 2004, “An overview of scrutiny: A Triumph of context over culture”Local Government Studies30538–556
3.
Audit Commission, 1997Representing the People: The Role of CouncillorsAudit Commission Publications, PO Box 99, Wetherby LS23 7JA
4.
ByrneT, 2000Local Government in Britain (Penguin, London)
5.
CharterisSCorriganP, 2000Developing Your Council's Scrutiny RoleNew Local Government Network, 2nd Floor, 42 Southwark Street, London SE1 1UN
6.
ColeM, 2001, “Local government modernisation: The executive and scrutiny model”Political Quarterly72239–245
7.
Commission to Strengthen Parliament, 2000Strengthening ParliamentNorton Commission, Conservative Party, 25 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0DL
8.
CorriganP, 2000Overview and Scrutiny: A Practitioners' GuideIDeA, Layden House, 76–86 Turnmill Street, London EC1M 5LG
9.
DaviesHGeddesM, 2000, “Deepening democracy of elite governance? New political management arrangements in local government”Public Money and Management214–19
10.
DETR, 1998aModern Local Government: In Touch with the People Cm 4014, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
11.
DETR1998bModernising Local Government: Local Democracy and Community Leadership Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
12.
DrewryG, 1985, “Scenes from committee life: The new committees in action”, in The New Select Committees Ed. DrewryG (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
13.
ElcockHFenwickJLilleyS, 2003, “Out of the loop? Councillors and the new political management”Public Policy and Administration18(1) 29–45
14.
FoxPLeachS, 1999Officers and Members in the New Democratic StructuresLocal Government Information Unit, 22 Upper Woburn Place, Euston, London, WC1H 0TB
15.
FoxPLyonsMSkelcherC, 2002Continuity or Change? Officers and New Council ConstitutionsInstitute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
16.
GambleA, 1990, “Theories of British government”Political Studies38404–420
17.
Government of Wales Act, 1998Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 38 (The Stationery Office, London)
18.
GriffithJ A GRyleM, 1990Parliament: Functions, Practice and Procedures (Sweet and Maxwell, London)
19.
Hansard Society, 2001The Challenge for Parliament: Making Government Accountable (Vacher Dod, London)
20.
JohnsonKHatterW, 2004Realising the Potential of ScrutinyNew Local Government Network, 2nd Floor, 42 Southwark Street, London SE1 1UN
21.
LeachS, 1999, “Introducing cabinets into British local government”Parliamentary Affairs52(1) 77–93
22.
LeachSCopusC, 2004, “Scrutiny and the political party group in UK local government: New models of behaviour”Public Administration8331–354
23.
LeachSWilsonD, 2002, “Rethinking local political leadership”Public Administration80665–689
24.
LeachSWilsonD, 2004, “Urban elites in England: New models of executive behaviour”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28134–149
25.
LeachSStewartJWalshK (Eds), 1994The Changing Organisation and Management of Local Government (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
26.
MarshDSmithM, 2001, “There is more than one way to do political science: On different ways to study policy networks”Political Studies49528–541
27.
MarshDRichardsDSmithM, 2003, “Unequal plurality: Towards an asymmetric power model of British politics”Government and Opposition38306–332
28.
ODPM, 2002The Government's Response to the Transport, Local Government and Regional Affairs Select Committee's Fourteenth Report on How the Local Government Act 2000 is WorkingOffice of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
29.
Public Administration Select Committee, 2004A Matter of Honour: Reforming the Honours System House of Commons Papers HC212-I (The Stationery Office, London)
30.
RaoN, 1999, “Representing the people? Testing assumptions about local government reform”Public Administration77257–271
31.
SandfordM, 2005Effective Scrutiny: Tools and Intended OutcomesConstitution Unit, University College London, London
32.
SandfordMMaerL, 2004Old Habits Die Hard? Overview and Scrutiny in English Local AuthoritiesConstitution Unit, University College London, London
33.
SnapeSDobbsL, 2003, “The scrutineer: The impact of overview and scrutiny on councillor roles”Public Policy and Administration18 (3) 46–62
34.
SnapeSTaylorF, 2001A Hard Nut to Crack? Making Overview and Scrutiny WorkIDeA, Layden House, 76–86 Turnmill Street, London EC1M 5LG
35.
SnapeSLeachSCopusC, 2002The Development of Overview and Scrutiny in Local GovernmentOffice of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
36.
StewartJ, 2003Modernising British Local Government: An Assessment of Labour's Reform Programme (Palgrave, Basingstoke, Hants)
37.
TomkinsA, 1998The Constitution after Scott: Government Unwrapped (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
38.
Transport, Local Government and the Regions Committee, 2002How the Local Government Act 2000 Is Working House of Commons Papers HC602-I (The Stationery Office, London)
39.
WoodhouseD, 1994Ministers and Parliament (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
