Rural development has, in recent years, become a major area of EU policy, to the extent that the term has even begun to be overused in signifying a new shift in EU rural policy. The result has been a great deal of misunderstanding and numerous divergent interpretations of both the concept and the practice. Although rural development existed as a policy domain before the arrival of the accentuated ‘Second Pillar’ of the reformed Common Agricultural Policy, the fact is that an increasingly Europeanized approach to rural development funding, programming, and administration has developed in the post-1999 period. In this paper we argue that the study of rural development policy will gain a great deal from using a policy network approach to interpret the dynamics of evolving rural development policy within member states. Our main aim is to analyze and interpret the newly emerging Rural Development Policy Network in Greece, which aspires to separate itself from a strong and resistant Agricultural Policy Network. The example of Greece suits the purpose of the paper not only because of Greece's continuing reliance on agriculture and the centrality of the latter in sustaining rural livelihoods, but most importantly due to the institutional arrangements developed around it, which are characterized by a prevalence of agricultural interests at the expense of wider rural concerns. The concern of this paper is with the mechanisms of transition, and to a lesser extent with its outcome. One major finding is that the policy network approach to the study of rural development policy in Greece brings to light a certain transformation in policy structures, mechanisms, and administration. This transformation is not so evident at the level of policy style and/or policy outcome. Due to it having been labeled a ‘laggard’ member state, Greece has been affected by the Europeanization of rural development policy and has to some extent transformed its policy-making procedures accordingly. At the same time, the process of Europeanization has acted to empower civil society mechanisms and actors.
BörzelTA, 1997, “What's so special about policy networks? An exploration of the concept and its usefulness in studying European governance”, European Integration Online Papers 1, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-016a.htm
3.
BörzelTA, 2000, “Why there is no ‘southern problem’: On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union”Journal of European Public Policy7141–162
4.
BörzelTA, 2001, “Non-compliance in the European Union: Pathology or statistical artefact?”Journal of European Public Policy8803–824
BrouwerFLoweP, 2000, “CAP and the environment: Policy development and the state of research”, in CAP Regimes and the European Countryside: Prospects for Integration between Agricultural, Regional and Environmental Policies Eds BrouwerFLoweP, (CABI, Wallingford, Oxon) pp 1–14
8.
BrydenJ, 2000, “Is there a ‘New Rural Policy’?”, paper presented at the International Conference: European Rural Policy at the Crossroads, 29 June-1 July, The Arkleton Centre for Rural Development Research, University of Aberdeen, http://www.abdn.ac.uk/arkleton/conf2000/papers/bryden.doc
9.
BullMBaudnerJ, 2004, “Europeanization and Italian policy for the Mezzogiorno”Journal of European Public Policy111058–1076
10.
BullerH, 2002, “Integrating EU environmental and agricultural policy”, in Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe Ed. LenschowA, (Earthscan, London) pp 103–126
11.
BullerH, 2004, “Getting between the vertical: Europeanization of French environmental policy”, in The Europeanization of Environmental Policy Eds JordanALiefferinkD, (Routledge, London) pp 81–98
12.
CarissonL, 2000, “Policy networks as collective action”Policy Studies Journal28502–520
13.
ChristiansenTFøllesdalAPiattoniS, 2003, “Informal governance in the European Union: An introduction”, in Informal Governance in the European Union Eds ChristiansenTPiattoniS, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 1–21
14.
ColeADrakeH, 2000, “The Europeanization of the French polity: Continuity, change and adaptation”Journal of European Public Policy726–43
15.
CollinsNLouloudisL, 1995, “Protecting the protected: The Greek agricultural policy network”, Journal of European Public Policy295–114
16.
DaugbjergC, 1999, “Reforming the CAP: Policy networks and broader institutional structures”Journal of Common Market Studies37407–428
17.
DimitrakopoulosD, 2001, “Learning and steering: Changing implementation patterns and the Greek central government”Journal of European Public Policy8604–622
18.
DowdingK, 1994, “Policy networks: Don't stretch a good idea too far”, in Contemporary Political Studies Eds DunleavyPStanyerJ, (Political Science Association, Belfast) pp 59–78
ECOTEC, 2003Ex-post Evaluation of the Objective 1 1994–1999: A Final Report to the Directorate General for Regional Policy (European Commission, Brussels)
EfstratoglouSPapadopoulosAGEfstratoglouAKouroussiE, 2001DORA The Dynamics of Rural Areas: The Greek Report final report, Agricultural University of Athens
23.
European Commission, 1996The Cork Declaration: A Living Countryside (European Commission, Brussels)
24.
European Commission, 1999, “Support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain regulations 17 May 1999” (L 160/26.6.1999), council regulation 1257/1999, European Commission, Brussels
GrayJ, 2000, “The common agricultural policy and the re-invention of the rural in the European Community”Sociologia Ruralis4030–52
27.
HanfKO'TooleLJ, 1992, “Revisiting old friends: Networks, implementation structures and the management of interorganizational relations”European Journal of Political Research21163–180
28.
HeritierA, 2002, “New modes of governance in Europe: Policy making without legislating?”, Political Science Series Paper 81, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna
29.
HeritierAKnillC, 2000, “Differential responses to European policies: A comparison”, preprints of the Max Planck Project Group, Bonn
HowlettM, 2002, “Do networks matter? Linking policy network structure to policy outcomes: Evidence from four Canadian policy sectors 1990–2000”Canadian Journal of Political Science35235–267
32.
IoakimidisPC, 2000, “The Europeanization of Greece: An overall assessment”South European Society and Politics573–94
33.
JordanAJLiefferinkD, (Eds), 2004Environment Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy (Routledge, London)
34.
JordanGSchubertC, 1992, “A preliminary ordering of policy network labels”European Journal of Political Research217–28
35.
KasimisCPapadopoulosAG, 1997, “Family farm and capitalist development in Greek agriculture: A critical review of the literature”Sociologia Ruralis37209–227
36.
KayA, 2003, “Path dependency and the CAP”Journal of European Public Policy10405–420
KostovPLingardJ, 2001, “Integrated rural development. Do we need a new approach?”, paper presented in the 73rd Seminar of the EAAE entitled “Policy Experiences with Rural Development in a Diversified Europe”, 28–30 June, Ancona, http://www.repec.org/plwpa/wuwpot/0409006.html
39.
LiarikosC, 2004, “Greek regional policy: Overview, analysis of the 3rd CSF and impacts on the environment”, WP 3/2004, World Wide Fund for Nature, Athens (in Greek)
40.
LiefferinkDAndersenMS, 1998, “Strategies of the ‘green’ member states in EU environmental policy-making”Journal of European Public Policy5254–270
41.
LiefferinkDJordanA, 2002, “The Europeanization of national environmental policy: A comparative analysis”, WP 2002/14, Governance and Places, Nijmegan School of Management, Radbond University, Nijmegen
42.
LiefferinkDJordanA, 2005, “An ‘even closer union’ of national policy? The convergence of national environmental policy in the European Union”European Environment15102–113
43.
LouloudisL, 1995, “Political aspects of state intervention in agriculture”Greek Review of Political Science6121–146 (in Greek)
44.
LouloudisL, 2002, “Stimulating organic farming. The case of Greece: Constraints and opportunities for development”, in The CAP and the Environmental Challenge Eds PezarosPDUnfriedM, (EIPA, Maastricht) pp 199–219
45.
LouloudisLBeopoulosN, 2002, “Broadening the sectoral perspective on agricultural policy in Greece”, in Nature and Agriculture in the European Union Eds BrouwerFvan der StraatenJ, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 182–203
46.
LouloudisLMaraveyasN, 1997, “Farmers and agricultural policy in Greece since the accession to the European Union”Sociologia Ruralis37270–286
47.
LouloudisLArahovitiEPapadopoulosDA, 2001, “Interaction between state and non-state actors in the implementation of the CAP agri-environmental measures”, in Environmental Politics in Southern Europe Eds EderKKoussisM, (Kluwer, Bonn) pp 277–298
48.
LowePBullerHWardN, 2002, “Setting the next agenda? British and French approaches to the second pillar of the common agricultural policy”Journal of Rural Studies181–17
49.
Managing Authority of the Greek Ministry of Finance, 2003Report on the Mid-term Evaluation of the 3rd Community Support Framework Athens
50.
MarsdenTEklundEFranklinA, 2004, “Rural mobilization as rural development: Exploring the impacts of new regionalism in Wales and Finland”International Planning Studies979–100
51.
MarshD, 1998a, “The development of the policy network approach”, in Comparing Policy Networks Ed. MarshD, (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks) pp 3–17
52.
MarshD, 1998b, “The utility and future of policy network analysis”, in Comparing Policy Networks Ed MarshD. (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks) pp 185–197
53.
MarshDSmithM, 2000, “Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectic approach”Political Studies484–21
54.
MontpetitE, 2000, “Europeanization and domestic politics: Europe and the development of a French environmental policy for the agricultural sector”Journal of European Public Policy7576–592
55.
NylandJ, 1995, “Issue networks and non-profit organizations”Policy Studies Review14195–204
56.
OlsenJP, 2002, “The many faces of Europeanization”Journal of Common Market Studies40921–952
57.
PapadopoulosAG, 2005, “EU rural development policy: The drive for policy integration within the second pillar of the CAP”, in Policy Integration for Complex Environmental Problems Ed. BriassoulisH, (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 117–155
58.
ParaskevopoulosCJ, 2001, “Social capital, learning and EU regional policy networks: Evidence from Greece”Government and Opposition36253–277
59.
PetersBG, 1998, “Policy networks: Myth, metaphor and reality”, in Comparing Policy Networks Ed. MarshD, (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks) pp 21–32
60.
PetersonJ, 2003, “Policy networks”, Political Science Series Paper 90, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna
61.
PotterCTilzeyM, 2005, “Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-fordist transition: Neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality”Progress in Human Geography29581–600
62.
RadaelliCM, 2000, “Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change”, European Integration Online Papers 4, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000–008a.htm
63.
RhodesRAW, 2000, “Governance and public administration”, in Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy Ed. PierreJ, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 54–90
64.
RhodesRAWMarshD, 1992, “New directions in the study of policy networks”European Journal of Political Research21181–205
65.
SaracenoE, 2002, “Rural development policies and the second pillar of the common agricultural policy”, paper presented to the Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Hanover, http://www.arl-net.de/veroe/wag_lawi/Saraceno.pdf
66.
SbragiaA, 2000, “The European Union as a coxswain: Governance by steering”, in Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy Ed. PierreJ, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 219–240
67.
SchoutAJordanA, 2005, “Coordinated European governance: Self-organizing or centrally steered?”Public Administration83201–220
68.
SotiropoulosDA, 2004, “Civil society in Greece: Atrophic or hidden?”, in The Unknown Civil Society Ed. SotiropoulosDA, (Potamos, Athens) pp 117–162 (in Greek)
69.
ThomsonKJPsaltopoulosD, 2004, “‘Integrated’ rural development policy in the EU: A term too far?”EuroChoices340–45
70.
van der PloegJDRentingIIBrunoriGKnickelKMannionJMarsdenTde RoestKSevilla-GuzmanEVenturaF, 2000, “Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory”Sociologia Ruralis40391–408
71.
van WaardenF, 1992, “Dimensions and types of policy networks”European Journal of Political Research2129–52
72.
WardNLoweP, 2004, “Europeanizing rural development? Implementing the CAP's second pillar in England”International Planning Studies9121–137
73.
WilsonG, 2001, “From productivism to post-productivism and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2677–102
74.
WinterM, 1996Rural Politics: Policies for Agriculture, Forestry and the Environment (Routledge, Londonn)
