The authors examine the extent to which the practices of social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting (SEAAR) provide opportunities for the identification, communication, and management of social and environmental risks. In introducing and exploring accounting practices, the theoretical allegiances of accounting are also outlined in order to situate accounting as a social science discipline which experiences similar debates to other areas of scholarship. The authors also extend discussion of risk governance and accounting by reference to the ‘new’ literature on risk from writers such as Adams, Beck, and Lash. It is suggested that the insights from these broader theorists on risk apply equally to conventional accounting and attempts via SEAAR to create an expanded governance framework. In particular, Beck identifies a number of critical aspects of risk governance that are also central to an understanding of accounting, including: the danger of seeking verifiable and neutral truth; the causal denial of harm; the contestation of expert and lay knowledge of risks; social construction of risk; and the radicalisation of rationality. Paraphrasing Beck, it is argued that accounting and accountants are incapable of managing the risks of industrialisation as they are implicated in the creation and multiplication of these risks, yet accounting and accountants, in particular those engaged in SEAAR, can play an essential role in identifying these risks. It is further argued that the contribution of SEAAR to risk governance will largely depend upon a radicalisation of accounting rationality in practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamBBeckUvan LoonJ, 2000Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory (Sage, London).
2.
AdamsC A, 2004, “The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal17731–757.
3.
AdamsJ, 1995Risk (UCL Press, London).
4.
American Accounting Association, 1966A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory (American Accounting Association, Sarasota, FL).
5.
American Accounting Association, 1975, “Report of the Committee on Concepts and Standards for External Financial Reports”Accounting Review50 (Supplement) 41–49.
6.
ArmstrongP, 1994, “The influence of Michel Foucault on accounting research”Critical Perspectives on Accounting525–55.
7.
ArringtonC EFrancisJ R, 1993, “Giving economic accounts: Accounting as cultural practice”Accounting, Organizations and Society18107–124.
8.
BallAOwenD LGrayR H, 2000, “External transparency or internal capture? The role of third party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports”Business Strategy and the Environment91–23.
9.
BartolomeoMBennettMBoumaJ JHeydkampPJamesPWoltersT, 2000, “Environmental management accounting in Europe: Current practice and future potential”European Accounting Review931–52.
10.
BaxterTBebbingtonJCutteridgeD, 2002, “The Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM)”, in Proceedings of the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Malaysia, 20–22 March (Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX).
11.
BaxterTBebbingtonJCutteridgeDHarveyG, 2003, “The Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM): Measuring sustainable development performance” in Proceedings of Offshore Europe, Aberdeen, 2–5 September (Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX).
12.
BebbingtonJ, 1997, “Engagement, education and sustainability: A review essay on environmental accounting”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal10365–381.
13.
BebbingtonJ, 2001, “Sustainable development: A review of the international development, business and accounting literature”Accounting Forum25128–157.
14.
BebbingtonJThomsonI, 1996, “Business conceptions of sustainable development and the implications for accountancy”, research report, Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London.
15.
BebbingtonJGrayRHibbittCKirkE, 2001Full Cost Accounting: An Agenda for Action (Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London).
16.
BeckU, 1992Risk Society (Sage, London); translated from Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne1986 (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main).
BeckU, 1999World Risk Society (Polity Press, Cambridge).
19.
BeckUGiddensALashS, 1994Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Polity Press, Cambridge).
20.
BennettMJamesP, 1998Environment Under the Spotlight—Current Practice and Future Trends in Environment-related Performance Measurement for Business (Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London).
21.
BerkhoutFGouldsonA, 2003, “Shaping, modulating, adapting: Perspectives on technology, environment and policy”, in Negotiating Change: Advances in Environmental Social Science Eds BerkhoutFLeachMScoonesI, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 231–260.
22.
BerryA JCappsTCooperDFergussonPHopperTLoweE A, 1985, “Management control in an area of the NCB: Rationales of accounting practices in a public enterprise”Accounting, Organisations and Society103–28.
23.
BirkinF, 1996, “The ecological accountant: From the cogito to thinking like a mountain”Critical Perspectives on Accounting7231–257.
24.
BoumaJ JJeuchenMKlinkersL, 2001Sustainable Banking: The Greening of Finance (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield).
25.
BroadbentJLaughlinR, 1997, “Developing empirical research in accounting: An example informed by a Habermasian approach”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal10622–648.
26.
BroadbentJJacobsKLaughlinR, 2001, “Organisational responses to unwanted accounting and finance changes with specific reference to general medical practice in the UK and New Zealand”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal14565–586.
27.
BrownNDeeganC, 1998, “The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory”Accounting and Business Research2921–41.
28.
BuhrN, 1998, “Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: The case of acid rain and Falconbridge”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal11163–190.
29.
CampbellD J, 2000, “Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction: Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer corporate reports 1969–1997”Accounting Forum2480–100.
ChuaW F, 1986, “Radical developments in accounting thought”The Accounting Review61601–632.
32.
ChuaW F, 1996, “Teaching and learning only the language of numbers—monolingualism in a multilingual world”Critical Perspectives on Accounting7129–156.
33.
CiancanelliPGallhoferSHumphreyCKirkhamL, 1990, “Gender and accountancy: Some evidence from the UK”Critical Perspectives on Accounting1117–144.
34.
CollisonDSlompS, 2000, “Environmental accounting, auditing and reporting in Europe: The role of FEE”European Accounting Review9111–129.
35.
CollisonDGrayRInnesJ, 1996The Financial Auditor and the Environment (Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London).
36.
CooperC, 1992, “The non and nom of accounting for (m)other nature”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal516–39.
37.
CooperC, 1995, “Ideology, hegemony and accounting discourse: A case study of the national union of journalists”Critical Perspectives on Accounting6175–209.
38.
CoulsonA B, 2000, “Banking on the environment: Risk and rationality”, in The Business of Greening Ed. FinemanS, (Routledge, London) pp 78–94.
39.
CoulsonA BDixonR, 1995, “Environmental risk and management strategy: The implications for financial institution”The International Journal of Bank Marketing1322–30.
40.
CoulsonA BMonksV, 1999, “Corporate environmental performance considerations within bank lending decisions”Eco-Management and Auditing61–10.
41.
DeyC, 2003, “Corporate ‘silent’ and ‘shadow’ social accounting”Social and Environmental Accounting Journal236–9.
42.
EverettJNeuD, 2000, “Ecological modernization and the limits of environmental accounting?”Accounting Forum245–29.
43.
GrayR, 1997, “The silent practice of social accounting and corporate social reporting in companies”, in Building Corporate Accountability: Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting Eds ZadeckSPruzanPEvansR, (Earthscan, London) pp 201–217.
44.
GrayR HOwenD LMaundersK T, 1987Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and Accountability (Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead, Herts).
45.
GrayRKouhyRLaversS, 1995a, “Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal847–77.
46.
GrayRKouhyRLaversS, 1995b, “Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal878–101.
47.
GrayROwenDAdamsC, 1996Accounting and Accountability (Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead, Herts).
48.
GrayRDeyCOwenDEvansRZadekS, 1997, “Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: Stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal10325–364.
49.
GrayRBebbingtonJCollisonDKouhyRLyonBReidCRussellAStevensonL, 1998The Valuation of Assets and Liabilities: Environmental Law and the Impact of the Environmental Agenda for Business (Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh).
50.
GrayRGibsonKLaingYDeyC, 2001, “The Silent Accounts Project: Draft silent and social accounts 1999–2000”, separate publication for Tesco plc and HSBC Holdings plc, British Accounting Association Scottish Group Conference, http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/management/csear/aptopractice/silentacc.html.
51.
HarteGOwenD, 1987, “Fighting de-industrialisation: The role of local government social audits”Accounting, Organizations and Society12123–141.
52.
HasseldineJSalamaATomsS, 2005, “Quantity versus quality: The impact of environmental disclosures on reputations of UK Plcs”British Accounting Review37231–248.
53.
HerbohnK, 2005, “A full cost accounting experiment”Accounting, Organisations and Society30519–536.
54.
HinesR, 1988, “Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality”Accounting, Organisations and Society13251–261.
55.
HinesR, 1991, “The FASB's conceptual framework, financial accounting and the maintenance of the social world”Accounting, Organizations and Society16313–331.
56.
HinesR D, 1992, “Accounting: Filling the negative space”Accounting, Organisations and Society17313–341.
57.
HopwoodA G, 1987, “The archaeology of accounting systems”Accounting, Organisations and Society12207–234.
58.
HopwoodAMillerP, (Eds), 1984Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
59.
HoskinsKMacveR, 1986, “Accounting and the examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power”Accounting Organisations and Society11105–136.
60.
HowesR, 2000, “Corporate environmental accounting: Accounting for environmentally sustainable profits”, in Greening the Accounts Eds SimonSProopsJ, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 223–245.
61.
ICAEW, Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, London. 1997Financial Reporting of Risks: Proposals for a Statement on Business Risk.
62.
ICAEW, Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, London. 1999aNo Surprises: The Case for Better Risk Reporting.
63.
ICAEW, Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, London. 1999bInternal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code.
64.
ICAEW, Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, London. 2002aNo Surprises: Working for Better Risk Reporting.
65.
ICAEW, Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, London. 2002bRisk Management for SMEs.
66.
IrwinA, 1985Risk and Control of Technology (Manchester University Press, Manchester).
67.
IrwinA, 1996, “Risk: The fascination of fear”The Times Higher Education, Supplement 31 May, page ….
68.
KleinN, 2001No Logo (Flamingo, London).
69.
KreanderN, 2001An Analysis of European Ethical Funds (Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London).
70.
Larrinaga-GonzalezCBebbingtonJ, 2001, “Environmental accounting practices—organizational change or institutional appropriation”Critical Perspectives on Accounting12269–292.
71.
LashS, 1994, “Expert systems or situated interpretation? Replies and critiques”, in Reflexive Modernization Eds BeckUGiddensALashS, (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 198–215.
72.
LashSBronislawSWynneB, (Eds), 1996Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology (Sage, London).
73.
LehmanC R, 1992Accounting's Changing Role in Social Conflict (Paul Chapman, London).
74.
LehmanG, 1999, “Disclosing new worlds: A role for social and environmental accounting and auditing”Accounting, Organizations and Society24217–241.
75.
LlewellynS, 1994, “Managing the boundary: How accounting is implicated in maintaining the organisation”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal74–23.
76.
McNicholasPHumphiesMGallhoferS, 2004, “Maintaining the empire: Maori women's experiences in the accountancy profession”Critical Perspectives on Accounting1557–93.
77.
MaundersK TBurrittR L, 1991, “Accounting and ecological crisis”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal49–26.
78.
MedawarC, 1976, “The social audit: A political view”Accounting, Organisations and Society1389–394.
79.
MeyerJ W, 1986, “Social environments and organizational accounting”Accounting, Organizations and Society11345–356.
80.
MilesS, 2003Social and Environmental Reporting and Ethical Investment (Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London).
81.
MillerP, 1990, “On the interactions between accounting and the state”Accounting, Organizations and Society15315–338.
82.
MillerPO'LearyT, 1987, “Accounting and the construction of the governable person”Accounting, Organizations and Society12235–265.
83.
MillerPRoseN, 1990, “Governing economic life”Economy and Society191–31.
84.
MilneM J, 1996, “On sustainability; the environment and management accounting”Management Accounting Research7135–161.
85.
NeimarkM K, 1992The Hidden Dimensions of Annual Reports: Sixty Years of Social Conflict at General Motors (Markus Wiener, New York).
86.
NeuDHeinckeM, 2004, “The subaltern speaks: Financial relations and the limits of governmentality”Critical Perspectives on Accounting15179–206.
87.
NeuDWarsameHPedwellK, 1998, “Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports”Accounting, Organisations and Society23265–282.
88.
O'DonovanG, 2002, “Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal15344–371.
89.
O'DwyerBOwenD, 2005, “Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation”British Accounting Review37205–230.
90.
OwenD L, 1990, “Towards a theory of social investment: A review essay”Accounting, Organisations and Society15249–266.
91.
OwenDGrayRBebbingtonJ, 1997, “Green accounting: Cosmetic irrelevance or radical agenda for change?”Asian Pacific Review of Accounting4175–198.
92.
ParkerL, 2005, “Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal18842–860.
93.
PattenD M, 1991, “Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure”Journal of Accounting and Public Policy10297–308.
94.
PerksR WRawlinsonDIngramL, 1992, “An exploration of ethical investment in the UK”British Accounting Review2443–65.
95.
PowerM, 1994The Audit Society (Demos, London).
96.
PuxtyA G, 1991, “Social accountability and universal pragmatics”Advances in Public Interest Accounting435–45.
97.
RobertsJ, 1991, “The possibilities of accountability”Accounting, Organizations and Society16355–368.
98.
Royal Society, 1983Risk Assessment: A Study Group Report (Royal Society, London).
99.
Royal Society, 1992Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management (Royal Society, London).
SustainAbility, 20–22 Bedford Row, London WC1R 4EB and United Nations Environment Programme.
106.
SustainAbility, 1997The 1997 Benchmark Survey: The Third International Progress Report on Company Environmental Reporting.
107.
SustainAbility, 2000The Global Reporters: The First International Benchmark Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting.
108.
SustainAbility, 2002The Global Reporters: The Second International Benchmark Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Trust Us!.
109.
SustainAbility, 2004The 2004 Global Reporters International Benchmark Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Risk and Opportunity: Best Practice in Non-financial Reporting.
110.
ThomsonI, 2007, “Mapping the terrain of sustainability accounting”, in Sustainability Accounting and Accountability Eds UnermanJO'DwyerBBebbingtonJ, (Routledge, London) forthcoming.
111.
ThomsonIBebbingtonJ, 2005, “Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation”Critical Perspectives on Accounting16507–533.
112.
TinkerA M, 1985Paper Prophets: A Social Critique of Accounting (Holt Saunders, Eastbourne, Sussex).
113.
TinkerA MLehmanCNeimarkM, 1991, “Falling down the hole in the middle of the road: Political quietism in corporate social reporting”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal428–54.
114.
TinkerTGrayR, 2003, “Beyond a critique of pure reason: From policy to politics to praxis in environmental and social research”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal16727–761.
115.
TomsJ S, 2002, “Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence”British Accounting Review34257–282.
116.
UnermanJO'DwyerBBebbingtonJ, (Eds), 2007Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (Routledge, London) forthcoming.
117.
WambsgannssJ RSanfordB, 1996, “The problem with reporting pollution allowances”Critical Perspectives on Accounting7643–652.
118.
WilmhurstT DFrostG R, 2000, “Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal1310–26.
119.
WynneB, 1989, “Frameworks of rationality in risk management: Towards the testing of naive sociology”, in Environmental Threats: Perception, Analysis and Management Ed. BrownJ, (Belhaven Press, London) pp 33–47.
120.
WynneB, 1992, “Risk and social learning: Reification to engagement”, in Social Theories of Risk Eds KrimskySGoldingD, (Praeger, New York) pp 275–297.
121.
WynneB, 1996, “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert – lay knowledge divide”, in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology Eds LashSBronislawSWynneB, (Sage, London) pp 44–83.
