Most US military technology is produced by military industrial firms (MIFs). The federal government substantially funds these firms, and provides the principal MIFs with a steady flow of profitable contracts. Unlike civilian-oriented firms, MIFs virtually have guaranteed profits, and need not emphasize cost minimization as a survival strategy. Instead, MIF management strategy focuses on information gathering, lobbying efforts, and marshalling the MIF labor force in order to influence the contract awards process. The operation of MIFs depends upon a set of alliances within defense-dependent communities and among local leaders, MIF management, Congress, and the Pentagon. These relationships empower MIF management, ensure MIF longevity, and provide a community with employment and an economic base. Endogenous control, a commonly cited ingredient of local or regional development, may be achieved in defense-dependent communities, despite external funding. The power and control exercised by MIFs may not, however, represent a sufficient condition for ‘development’, given problems of inefficiency that tend to characterize these specialized firms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsG, 1981The Politics of Defense Contracting: The Iron Triangle (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ)
2.
BarronJ, 1980, “How Grumman spends its campaign fund”New York Times 26 October, section 3, page 22
3.
BassandM, 1981, “Structure of regional power and development”, in Polarized Development and Regional Policies: Tribute to Jacques Boudeville Ed. KuklinskiA, (Mouton, The Hague) pp 241–250
4.
BayetteB, 1977, “No light at the end of this tunnel”Los Angeles Times 15 July, section 4, page 1
5.
BirnbaumJH, 1987, “Congressman who returned after 12 years notes changes including more lobbying, budget fights”Wall Street Journal 15 June, page 46
6.
BluestoneBHarrisonB, 1982The Deindustrialization of America: Plant Closings, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry (Basic Books, New York)
7.
BluestoneBJordanPSullivanM, 1981Aircraft Industry Dynamics (Auburn House, Boston, MA)
8.
BroadWJ, 1986, “NASA chief might not take part in decisions on booster contracts”New York Times 7 December, page 1
9.
BrowneLE, 1987, “Too much of a good thing? Higher wages in New England”New England Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Boston) January/February issue, pages 39–53
10.
CarringtonT, 1987a, “Pentagon official calls for truce with contractors”Wall Street Journal 8 April, page 58
11.
CarringtonT, 1987b, “Current, ex-Northrop employees say poor work was done on MX system”Wall Street Journal 15 June, page 46
12.
CoffeyWJPolèseM, 1984, “The concept of local development: A stages model of endogenous regional growth”Papers of the Regional Science Association551–12
13.
CohenRB, 1977, “Multinational corporations, international finance, and the Sunbelt”, in The Rise of the Sunbelt Cities Eds PerryD CWatkinsA J, (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 211–216
14.
CooperAC, 1971, “Spin-offs and technical entrepreneur ship”IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementEM-182–6
15.
De GrasseRW, 1984, “The military and semiconductors”, in The Militarization of High Technology Ed. TirmanJ, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 77–104
16.
DickenP, 1976, “The multi-plant enterprise and geographical space: Some issues in the study of external control and regional development”Regional Studies10401–412
17.
DorferI, 1983Arms Deal: The Selling of the F-16 (Praeger, New York)
18.
DumasLJ, 1982, “Military spending and economic decay”, in The Political Economy of Arms Reduction Ed. DumasL J, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 1–26
19.
DumasLJ, 1984, “University research, industry innovation, and the Pentagon”, in The Militarization of High Technology Ed. TirmanJ, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 123–151
20.
DwyerPPayneS, 1987, “The General Dynamics case sets a bad precedent”Business Week 8 June, page 41
21.
FirnJR, 1975, “External control and regional development: The case of Scotland”Environment and Planning A7393–414
22.
GellenM, 1971, “Whither California?”, in The War Economy of the United States Ed. MelmanS, (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 187–200
23.
GepfurtK, 1980, “No recession for Rockwell, says its chief”Los Angeles Times 19 March, section 4, page 1
24.
GopoianJD, 1984, “What makes PACs tick? An analysis of the allocation patterns of economic interest groups”American Journal of Political Science28259–281
25.
GorgolJF, 1971, “A theory of the military industrial firm”, in The War Economy of the United States Ed. MelmanS, (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 60–71
26.
HenryDKOliverRP, 1987, “The defense buildup, 1977–85: Effects on production and employment”Monthly Labor Review1103–11
27.
HollandLHHooverRA, 1985The MX Decision: A New Direction in US Weapons Procurement Policy? (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
28.
HollonJ, 1977, “500 former B-1 workers attend job fair”Los Angeles Times 21 September, section 1, page 29
29.
HoustonP, 1977, “House refuses to cancel funds for 2 B-l planes”Los Angeles Times 7 December, section 1, page 6
30.
KahleyWJ, 1982, “Southern fireworks: Will defense spending light up the South?”Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta) December issue, pages 21–31
31.
KlimasewskiT, 1978, “Corporate dominance of manufacturing in Appalachia”Geographical Review6894–102
32.
KoistinenPAC, 1980The Military-Industrial Complex (Praeger, New York)
33.
KotenJ, 1987, “McDonnell Douglas lobbies Congress to save Apache helicopter program”Wall Street Journal 12 March, page 20
34.
KrummeG, 1981, “Corporate organization and regional development in the American federal system: Theory and policy perspectives”, in Federalism and Regional Development: Case Studies on the Experience in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany Ed. HoffmanG W, (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX) pp 154–192
35.
KwokaJE, 1984, “Market power and market change in the US automobile industry”Journal of Industrial Economics32509–522
36.
LiebersonS, 1971, “An empirical study of military-industrial linkages”American Journal of Sociology76562–584
37.
LotchinRW, (Ed.), 1984The Martial Metropolis: US Cities in War and Peace (Praeger, New York)
38.
McGranahanDA, 1982, “Absentee and local ownership of industry in northwestern Wisconsin”Growth and Change1331–35
39.
McIntyreSH, 1982, “Obstacles to corporate innovation”Business Horizons2523–28
40.
MaleckiEJ, 1982, “Federal R&D spending in the United States of America: Some impacts on metropolitan economies”Regional Studies1619–35
41.
MaleckiEJ, 1984, “Military spending and the US defense industry: Regional patterns of military contracts and subcontracts”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy231–44
42.
MarkusenAR, 1986, “Defense spending: A successful industrial policy?”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research10105–121
43.
MarkusenAR, 1987Regions: The Economics and Politics of Territory (Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ)
44.
MelmanS, 1986, “The limits of military power”International Security1172–87
45.
MillerJVollmannTE, 1985, “The hidden factory”Harvard Business Review5142–150
46.
MoweryDCRosenbergN, 1981, “Technical change in the commercial aircraft industry, 1925–1975”Technological Forecasting and Social Change20347–358
47.
National Science Foundation, 1979Science Indicators Report of the National Science Board, 1978 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
48.
NobleDF, 1982, “The social and economic consequences of the military influence on the development of industrial technology”, in The Political Economy of Arms Reduction Ed. DumasL J, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 91–105
49.
NorthDC, 1955, “Location theory and regional economic growth”Journal of Political Economy63243–258
50.
Ó'hUallacháinB, 1987, “Regional and technological implications of the recent buildup in American defense spending”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77208–223
51.
OliverRP, 1971, “Employment effects of reduced defense spending”Monthly Labor Review943–11
52.
PeckMJSchererFM, 1962The Weapons Acquisition Process: An Economic Analysis (Harvard University Business School, Boston, MA)
53.
PredA, 1976, “The interurban transmission of growth in advanced economies: Empirical findings versus regional planning assumptions”Regional Studies10151–171
54.
RedburnT, 1981, “Rockwell flying high despite B-1 loss”Los Angeles Times 3 October, section 1, page 10
RundquistBS, 1978, “On testing a military industrial complex theory”American Politics Quarterly629–53
57.
SchlesingerT, 1984, “Labor, automation and regional development”, in The Militarization of High Technology Ed. TirmanJ, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 181–213
58.
SchumpeterJA, 1950Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy3rd edition (Harper and Row, New York)
59.
SchwadelF, 1987, “Marietta forges into new space field”Wall Street Journal 24 March, page 6
60.
SimsDE, 1970, “Spoon-feeding the military—how new weapons come to be”, in The Pentagon Watchers Eds RodbergL SShearerD, (Doubleday, New York) pp 225–265
61.
SingB, 1982, “Rockwell gets go-ahead to start up production of the B-l bomber”Los Angeles Times 21 January, section 4, page 1
62.
StöhrW, 1982, “Structural characteristics of peripheral areas and the relevance of the stock-in-trade variables of regional science”Papers of the Regional Science Association4971–84
63.
TempestR, 1983, “Defense industries touch every corner of the nation”Los Angeles Times 10 July, pages 1–2
64.
ThirlwallAP, 1974, “Regional economic disparities and regional policy in the Common Market”Urban Studies111–12
65.
ThurowLC, 1985The Zero-sum Solution: Building a World-class American Economy (Simon and Schuster, New York)
66.
TirmanJ, 1984, “The defense–economy debate”, in The Militarization of High Technology Ed. TirmanJ, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 1–32
67.
UllmannJE, 1984, “The Pentagon and the firm”, in The Militarization of High Technology Ed. TirmanJ, (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 105–122
68.
WattsHD, 1981The Branch Plant Economy: A Study of External Control (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
69.
WeinraubB, 1978, “Inquiry set on Grumman lobbying”New York Times 15 February, pages A1, D10
70.
WeismanSR, 1978, “Carey aide accuses O'Neill on Grumman cutback”New York Times 17 February, section 4, page 1
71.
WhiteE, 1987a, “Northrop sees 2nd period loss on write-down”Wall Street Journal 16 June, page 14
72.
WhiteE, 1987b, “Rash of investigations is damaging image of Northrop Corp.”Wall Street Journal 22 June, pages 1, 15
73.
WilliamsonOE, 1981, “The modern corporation: Origin, evolution, attributes”Journal of Economic Literature191537–1568
