The appropriateness and importance of market-based environmental governance systems vary according to different cases. Although so-called ‘market trading’ regimes can be useful in some circumstances, a false belief in the inevitability of their cost-effectiveness compared with so-called ‘command and control’ systems has allowed policy distortions to occur. So-called ‘command and control’ policies are being underemphasised, despite the fact that they may achieve reductions in carbon emissions that are cheaper than those likely to be achieved through emissions (or ‘certificate’) trading regimes. I address theoretical arguments which I then place in context with analysis of some features of the British Renewables Obligation and the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartleIVassP, 2006, “Economic regulators and sustainable development—promoting good governance”, Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries, School of Management, University of Bath
2.
BrynerG, 1993Blue Skies, Green Politics: The Clean Air Act of 1990 (Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC)
3.
ButlerLNeuhoffK, 2004, “Comparison of feed in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0503, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge
4.
CoaseR, 1960, “The problem of social cost”Journal of Law and Economics31–44
5.
ColeD, 2002Pollution and Property: Comparing Ownership Institutions for Environmental Protection (Cambridge University Press, New York)
6.
CommonM, 1995Sustainability and Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
7.
DalesJ, 1968Pollution Property and Prices (Toronto University Press, Toronto)
8.
DamroCMendezP, 2003, “Emissions trading at Kyoto: From EU resistance to union innovation”Environmental Politics1271–94
9.
DEFRA, 2007, “EU emissions trading school approved. Phase II. National Allocation Plan”, March, Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
10.
DriesenDM, 2003The Economic Dynamism of Environmental Law (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
EgenhoferCFujiwaraNÅhmanMZetterbergL, 2006, “The EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Taking stock and looking ahead”, European Climate Platform (CEPS and CLIPORE), Brussels, Belgium/Svartsjö, Sweden
13.
EllermanASchmalenseeRJoskowPMonteroJBaileyE, 1997, “Emissions trading under the US Acid Rain Program: Evaluation of compliance costs and allowance market performance”, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
14.
Enviros Consulting, 2006, ‘“Review and development of carbon dioxide abatement curves for available technologies as part of the Energy Efficiency Innovation Review”, final report, Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
European Commission, 2005b, “Further guidance on allocation plans for the 2008 to 2012 trading period of the EU Emission Trading Scheme”, COM(2005)703 final, 22 December
17.
European Commission, 2006, “Emissions trading: Commission decides on first set of national allocation plans for the 2008–2012 trading period”, IP/06/1650, press release, 29 November
18.
GreenR, 2006, “Carbon tax or carbon permits: The impact on generators' risks”, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham
19.
HayekF, 1944The Road to Serfdom (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
20.
ICF Consulting, 2006, “Including aviation into the EU ETS: Impact on EU allowance prices”, Department for Transport and Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
21.
LauberVTokeD, 2005, “Einspeisetarife sind billiger und effizienter als Quoten-/Zertifikatssysteme. Der Vergleich Deutschland–Großbritannien stellt frühere Erwartungen auf den Kopf”Zeitschrift für Neues Energierecht9132–139
22.
L.E.K. Consulting, 2006, “Policy frameworks for renewables—analysis on policy frameworks to drive future investment in near and long-term renewable power in the UK”, Carbon Trust, 8th floor, 3 Clement's Inn, London WC2A 2AZ
23.
LohmannL, 2005, “Marketing and making carbon dumps: Commodification, calculation and counterfactuals in climate change mitigation”Science as Culture14203–235
McCarthyJPrudhamS, 2004, “Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism”Geoforum35275–283
26.
McGovernM, 2007, “Government change of heart brings relief in Spain”Wind Power Monthly2329
27.
MitchellC, 2000, “The England and Wales non-fossil fuel obligation: History and lessons”Annual Review of Energy and Environment25285–312
28.
MitchellCBauknechtDConnorP, 2006, “Effectiveness through risk reduction: A comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany”Energy Policy34297–305
29.
MontgomeryD, 1972, “Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programmes”Journal of Economic Theory5395–418
30.
MooreC, 2004, “RECLAIM: Southern California's failed experiment with air pollution trading”Environmental Law Reporter News and Analysis3410261–10274
31.
OatesWPortneyPMcGartlandA, 1989, “The net benefits of incentive-based regulation: A case study of environmental standard setting”The American Economic Review791233–1242
32.
Official Journal of the European Union2003, “Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC”Official Journal of the European UnionL275/32 (25 October)
33.
Official Journal of the European Union2004, “Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004”L338/18 (13 November)
34.
Oxera, 2005, “Plugging the carbon productivity gap”, Oxera, Park Central, 40/41 Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1JD
RickersonWGraceR, 2007, “The debate over fixed price incentives for renewable electricity in Europe and the United States: Fallout and future directions”, Heinrich Böll Foundation, Washington, DC, http://www.boell.org/docs/Rickerson_Grace_FINAL.pdf
39.
SijmJVanDril, 2003, “The interaction between the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Energy Policy Instruments in the Netherlands: Implications of the EU Directive for Dutch climate policies”, ECN, Petten, The Netherlands, http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2003/c03060.pdf
SorrellSSijmJ, 2003, “Carbon trading in the policy mix”Oxford Review of Economic Policy19420–437
42.
SternN, 2006The Economics of Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
43.
StiglerG, 1971, “The theory of economic regulation”Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science23–21
44.
TietenbergT, 2003, “The tradable-permits approach to protecting the commons: Lessons for climate change”Oxford Review Of Economic Policy19400–419
45.
TokeD, 2005, “Are green electricity certificates the way forward for renewable energy? An evaluation of the United Kingdom's Renewables Obligation in the context of international comparisons”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policty23361–374
46.
TokeD, 2007, “Investment in renewable energy, renewable financial support systems and cost-effectiveness”Journal of Cleaner Production15280–287
47.
TokeDLauberV, 2007, “Anglo Saxon and German approaches to neo-liberalism and environmental policy: The case of financing renewable energy”Geoforum38677–687
48.
TokeDTaylorS, 2007, “Demand reduction in the UK—with a focus on the non-domestic sector”Energy Policy352131–2140
49.
WeitzmanM, 1974, “Prices vs. quantities”Review of Economic Studies41477–491
