Britain has a fragmented, overlapping, and underresourced system of business representation. Attempts at reform, however, have proved difficult and largely unsuccessful. A coherent and logical system is relevant, in terms of both an effective dialogue between government and business, and the promotion of competitiveness and productivity. Through interviews and archival evidence, I look at how government has attempted to reform business associations. The main focus is the Heseltine initiatives of the 1990s: I outline the various initiatives taken, reveal the extent to which policy represented continuity or change, and consider whether the initiatives were effective. I show that they had a degree of success but that they would have made greater impact if they had been sustained over a longer period of time. A consideration of the historical context, moreover, suggests there may be limits to the role of government intervention in business association reform.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeerS, 1965Modern British Politics (Faber and Faber, London)
2.
BennettRJ, 1995, “The logic of local business associations: An analysis of voluntary chambers of commerce”Journal of Public Policy15251–279
3.
BennettR, 1997, “The relation between government and business associations in Britain: An evaluation of recent developments”Journal of Policy Studies185–33
4.
BennettRJPayneD, 2000Local and Regional Economic Development: Renegotiating Power Under Labour (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
5.
BennettRRobsonP, 2004, “Support services for SMEs: Does the ‘franchisee’ make a difference to the Business Link offer?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22859–880
6.
BoleatM, 2000, “Models of trade association co-operation”, Trade Association Forum, Centre Point, 103 New Oxford Street, London WC1A 1DU
7.
BoleatM, 2003, “Managing trade associations”, Trade Association Forum, Centre Point, 103 New Oxford Street, London WC1A 1DU
Cabinet Office, 2004, “Code of practice on written consultations”, Cabinet Office, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ
10.
CawsonA, 1982Corporatism and Welfare (Heinemann, London)
11.
CawsonA, 1985, “Introduction”, in Organised Interests and the State Ed. CawsonA (Sage, London) pp 1–21
12.
CoxGLowePWinterM, 1990, “Agricultural regulation and the politics of milk production”, in Corporatism and Accountability Eds CrouchCDoreR (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 169–198
13.
Devlin Commission, 1972, “Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Industrial and Commercial Representation”, Association of British Chambers of Commerce/Confederation of British Industry, available from the Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry
14.
DTI, 1996A Best Practice Guide for the Model Trade Association (Department of Trade and Industry, London)
15.
GrantW, 1987, “Introduction”, in Business Interests, Organizational Development and Private Interest Government Ed. GrantW (de Gruyter, Berlin) pp 1–17
16.
GrantW, 1991, “Continuity and change in British business associations”, in Organising Business for War Eds GrantWNekkersJvan WaardenF (Berg, Oxford) pp 23–46
17.
GrantW, 1993Business and Politics in Britainsecond edition (Macmillan, London)
18.
GrantW, 2000Pressure Groups and British Politics (Macmillan, London)
19.
GrantW, 2001, “From ‘insider’ politics to direct action”Parliamentary Affairs54337–348
20.
HeseltineM, 1987Where There's a Will (Hutchinson, London)
21.
HeseltineM, 1993, “Speech on trade associations”, CBI, 17 June, Department of Trade and Industry, London
22.
HeseltineM, 2000Life in the Jungle: My Autobiography (Hodder and Stoughton, London)
HM Government, 1996Competitiveness: Helping Business to Win: Consultation on a New Approach to Business Support (Cabinet Office, London)
25.
JenkinM, 1981British Industry and the North Sea (Macmillan, London)
26.
JordanG, 1981, “Iron triangles, woolly corporatism and elastic nets: Images of the policy process”Journal of Public Policy195–123
27.
LynnLHMcKeownTJ, 1988, “Trade associations in America and Japan”, American Enterprise Institute, 1150 Seventeenth Street, Washington, DC 20036
28.
MacdonaldA, 2001, “The business of representation”, Trade Association Forum, Centre Point, 103 New Oxford Street, London WC1A 1DU
29.
MarquandD, 1988The Unprincipled Society (Fontana, London)
30.
MitchellN, 1990, “The decentralisation of business in Britain”Journal of Politics52622–637
31.
OlsonM, 1971The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups2nd edition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
32.
ParkerS, 1984, “Corporatism and business interest associations: The relationship between the Confederation of British Industry and its member associations with special reference to the BRIMEC experiment”, MA thesis, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry
33.
SchmitterPLanzalacoL, 1989, “Regions and the organisation of business interests”, in Regionalism, Business Interests and Public Policy Eds ColemanWJacekH (Sage, London) pp 201–230
34.
SchmitterSStreeckW, 1999, “The organisation of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies”, discussion paper, http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/dp97-99_de.html
35.
StreeckWSchmitterPC (Eds), 1985Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State (Sage, London)
36.
van SchendelenMPCM (Ed.), 1993National, Public and Private EC Lobbying (Dartmouth Publishing, Aldershot, Hants)
