The institutionalization of just decision making in urban policy and planning is fundamental for the achievement of social justice in the city. In this paper we highlight the importance of generating adequate institutional conditions for the constitution of cosmopolis, Sandercock's postmodern utopia of justice. In doing that we resort to sociological institutionalist approaches to planning and policy analysis to evaluate a specific planning practice in the Portuguese planning system. Hence, after putting forward an appropriate analytical framework we tell the story of the decision-making process in the revision of Porto's Municipal Director Plan by delving through its intertwined history and evaluating it against the chosen criteria of social justice. The transcendent aim of this paper is to help to find opportunities for institutional improvements which can open the way for nonoppressive decision making and a more socially just urban future in Portugal and elsewhere.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbercrombieNHillSTurnerB, 1988Dictionary of Sociology (Penguin, London)
2.
Campo Aberto, 2006Reflectir o Porto e a Regiao Metropolitana do Porto [Reflecting on Porto and the Metropolitan Region] (Campo Aberto, Porto)
3.
CardosoRBreda-VázquezI, 2007, “Social justice as a guide to planning theory and practice: analyzing the Portuguese planning system”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research31384–400
4.
CarsG, HealeyP, MadanipourA, de MagalhaesC (Eds), 2002Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
5.
CMP, 2005, “Plano Director Municipal: relatório” [Municipal Director Plan: report], volumes 1 and 2, Pelouro do Urbanismo e Mobilidade, Caõmara Municipal do Porto, Porto, http://www.cm-fafe.pt/82
6.
Costa LoboM, 2001Administração Urbanística: Evolução Legal e a sua Prática [Urban administration: legal evolution and its practice] (Instituto Superior Técnico Press, Lisboa)
7.
DikeçM, 2007Badlands of the Republic: Space, Politics, and Urban Policy (Blackwell, Malden, MA)
8.
DominguesAPortasNSá MarquesT, 2007, “Portugal: urban policies or policies with an urban incidence?”, National Policy Responses to Urban Challenges in Europe Eds van den BergL, BraunE, van der MeerJ (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 311–332
9.
FainsteinS, 2003, “New directions in planning theory”, Readings in Planning Theory Eds FainsteinS, CampbellS (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 173–195
10.
FainsteinS, 2005, “Planning theory and the city”Journal of Planning Education and Research25121–130
11.
FainsteinS, forthcoming, “Planning and the just city”Searching for the Just City Eds MarcuseP, ConnollyJ, NovyJ, OlivioI, PotterJ, SteilJ (Routledge, New York)
12.
FoucaultM, 1980Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (Pantheon Books, New York)
13.
GonzálezSHealeyP, 2005, “A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity”Urban Studies422055–2069
14.
GualiniE, 2001Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
15.
GualiniE, 2002, “Institutional capacity building as an issue of collective action and institutionalisation: some theoretical remarks”, Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux Eds CarsG, HealeyP, MadanipourA, de MagalhãesC (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 29–44
16.
HarveyD, 1973Social justice and the City (Edward Arnold, London)
17.
HarveyD, 2000Spaces of Hope (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
18.
HarveyD, 2002, “Social justice, postmodernism and the city”, Readings in Urban Theory Eds FainsteinS, CampbellS (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 386–402
19.
HealeyP, 2006, “Transforming governance: challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space”European Planning Studies14299–320
20.
HealeyP, 2007, “The new institutionalism and the transformative goals of planning”, Institutions and Planning Ed. VermaN (Elsevier, Oxford) pp 61–87
21.
HillierJ, 2002Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land Use Planning (Routledge, London)
MóiaP, 2006As Tecnologias de Informação Geográfica no Apoio à Avaliação em Planeamento Territorial: Potencialidades e Limitações Face a Desafios [Geographic information technologies in the support of evaluation in spatial planning: potentials and limitations in the face of challenges], MSc dissertation, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto
24.
Rosa PiresA, 2001, “Breaking the ties with the master plan: spatial strategic plans in Portugal”, The Changing Institutional Landscape of Planning Eds AlbrechtsL, AldenJ, Rosa PiresA (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 181–207
25.
Rosa PiresA, 2005, “The fragile foundations of European spatial planning in Portugal”European Planning Studies13237–252
26.
RuivoF, 2000Um Estado Labiríntico: O Poder Relacional nas Relações entre Poderes Central e Local em Portugal (Afrontamento, Porto)
