In this paper we report on the results of a residential questionnaire survey (N= 1088) exploring the relative importance of health-risk perception as compared with social–contextual determinants of urban pesticide bylaw support in two Canadian cities: Calgary and Halifax. Multivariate analysis was used in order to determine the model estimates for five outcome variables: pesticide policy preference, pesticide-risk perception, a weed-free aesthetic, pesticide use, and chemical dissent. Findings indicate that the strongest determinants (based on relative odds) of pesticide preference are pesticide-free yard-care practices and divergent lawn aesthetics (eg pesticide-free versus weed-free yards). Though risk perception does help distinguish between differences in policy preferences, pesticide use, and chemical dissent, it does not for aesthetic preferences. Pesticide bylaw preference is more than just a health-risk perception issue; it is also situated in the experiences of residents' everyday lives (eg yard care) where decisions about pesticide use are made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BabbieE, 2001The Practice of Social Science Research (Wadsworth Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA)
2.
BaxterJEylesJElliottS, 1999, “‘Something happened’: the relevance of the risk society for describing the siting process for a municipal landfill”Geografiska Annaler1891–109
3.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 2002, “Risk, responsibility, and blame: an analysis of vocabularies of motive in air-pollution(ing) discourses”Environment and Planning A342175–2192
4.
BoholmA, 1996, “Risk perception and social anthropology: critique of cultural theory”Ethnos6164–84
5.
BourdieuP, 1984Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Routledge, London)
6.
BrenotJBonnefousSMarrisC, 1998, “Testing the cultural theory of risk in France”Risk Analysis18729–739
City of Halifax, 2000, “Halifax regional municipality by-law P-800 respecting the regulation of pesticides, herbicides and insecticides”, Halifax Regional Municipality, http://www.halifax.ca.legislation.bylaws.hrm/blp-800.pdf
12.
CoppinDEisenhauerBKrannichR, 2002, “Is pesticide use socially acceptable? A comparison between urban and rural settings”Social Science Quarterly83379–394
13.
CrichtonN, 2001, “Information point: odds ratios”Journal of Clinical Nursing10268–269
14.
DakeK, 1972, “Myths of nature: culture and the social construction of risk”Journal of Social Issue4821–37
15.
DouglasMWildavskyA, 1982Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers (University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA)
16.
DuncanJDuncanN, 2004Landscapes of Privilege: The Politics of the Aesthetics in an American Suburb (Routledge, New York)
17.
Evans-CowleyJNasarJ, 2004, “Amarillo yard art: resident responses to yard signs and their regulation”Journal of the American Planning Association7067–80
18.
FarrellSAubryTCoulombeD, 2004, “Neighborhoods and neighbors: do they contribute to personal well-being?”Journal of Community Psychology329–25
19.
FeaganRRipmeesterM, 1999, “Contesting natural(ized) lawns: a geography of private green space in the Niagara region”Urban Geography20617–634
20.
FeaganRRipmeesterM, 2001, “Reading private green space: competing geographic identities at the level of the lawn”Philosophy and Geography479–95
21.
FischhoffB, 1995, “Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process”Risk Analysis15137–145
22.
FischhoffBSlovicPLichtensteinS, 1978, “How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits”Policy Sciences9127–152
23.
FlynnJSlovicPMertzC K, 1994, “Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks”Risk Analysis141101–1108
24.
HarrisPBrownB, 1996, “The home and identity display: interpreting resident territoriality from home exteriors”Journal of Environmental Psychology16187–203
25.
JayS, 2007, “Pylons in the back yard: local planning and perceived risks to health”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25423–438
26.
JenkinsV, 1994The Lawn: A History of an American Obsession (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC)
27.
JohnstonRDorlingDTunstallHRossiterDMacAllisterIPattieC, 2000, “Locating the altruistic voter: context, egocentric voting, and support for the Conservative Party at the 1997 General Election in England and Wales”Environment and Planning A32673–694
28.
JohnstonRPropperCSarkerRJonesKBolsterABurgessS, 2005, “Neighbourhood social capital and neighbourhood effects”Environment and Planning A371443–1459
29.
KrausNMalmforsTSlovicP, 1992, “Intuitive toxicology: expert and lay judgments of chemical risks”Risk Analysis12215–232
30.
MacintyreSEllawayA, 1998, “Short report: social and local variations in the use of urban neighbourhoods: a case study in Glasgow”Health and Place491–94
31.
MacintyreSEllawayACumminsS, 2002, “Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them?”Social Science and Medicine55125–139
32.
MacintyreSEllawayAHiscockRKearnsADerGMcKayL, 2003, “What features of the home and the area might help to explain observed relationships between housing tenure and health? Evidence from the west of Scotland”Health and Place9207–218
33.
MamadouhV, 1999, “Grid-group cultural theory: an introduction”GeoJournal47395–409
34.
MarrisCLangfordIO'RiordanT, 1998, “A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: comparison with the psychometric paradigm”Risk Analysis18635–647
PoortingaWStegLVlekC, 2002, “Environmental risk concern and preferences for energy-saving measures”Environment and Behavior34455–478
37.
PralleS, 2006, “The ‘mouse that roared’: agenda setting in Canadian pesticide politics”The Policy Studies Journal34171–194
38.
PurcellM, 2001, “Neighborhood activism among homeowners as a politics of space”The Professional Geographer53178–194
39.
PutnamR, 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York)
40.
RobbinsPBirkenholtzT, 2003, “Turfgrass revolution: measuring the expansion of the American lawn”Land Use Policy20181–194
41.
RobbinsPSharpJ, 2003, “The lawn-chemical economy and its discontents”Antipode35955–979
42.
SandbergLFosterJ, 2005, “Challenging lawn and order: environmental discourse and lawn reform in Canada”Environmental Politics14478–494
43.
ScottD, 2005, “When precaution points two ways: confronting ‘West Nile Fever”’Canadian Journal of Law and Society2027–65
44.
SearsMWalkerCvan der JagtRClamanP, 2006, “Pesticide assessment: protecting public health on the home turf”Paediatrics and Child Health11229–234
45.
SjöbergL, 1996, “A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception”Radiation Protection Dosimetry68219–225
46.
SjöbergL, 2000a, “The methodology of risk perception research”Quality and Quantity34407–418
47.
SjöbergL, 2000b, “Factors in risk perception”Risk Analysis201–11
48.
SkajaevelandOGarlingT, 1997, “Effects of interactional space on neighbouring”Journal of Environmental Psychology17181–198
49.
SlovicP, 1987, “Perception of risk”Science236280–285
50.
SlovicP, 1999, “Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield”Risk Analysis19689–701
51.
SlovicPMalmforsTKrewskiDMertzCNeilNBartlettS, 1995, “Intuitive toxicology 11: expert and lay judgments of chemical risks in Canada”Risk Analysis15661–675
52.
SmithS, 1984, “Practicing humanistic geography”Annals of the Association of American Geographers74353–374
53.
StarrC, 1969, “Social benefit versus technological risk”Science1651232–1238
