Attempts to better integrate policy in pursuit of more sustainable development have been made by many countries through the application of ex ante policy appraisal to sectoral policies. The United Kingdom (UK) is often cited as an international leader in this regard, but this is by no means clear. We examine empirically the extent to which the UK Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) system facilitates more integrated, and ultimately sustainable, policies. It appears RIA practice is far from integrated. Many RIAs cover a narrow range of impacts, are conducted late in the policy process, have relatively closed consultation processes, do not explicitly show how trade-offs were made, and use analysis inconsistently, if at all. We argue that providing more resources and improving quality control for RIA may improve integration to only a limited degree. More fundamental barriers to integration are hindered by closed policy communities and institutional processes and therefore may be more difficult to overcome.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelleCHertinJJordanA, 2006, “Sustainable development ‘outside’ the European Union: What role for impact assessment?”European Environment1657–62
2.
BacheIJordanA, 2006The Europeanization of British Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
3.
Blom-HansenJ, 1997, “A ‘new institutional’ perspective on policy networks”Public Administration75669–693
EalesRSmithSTwigger-RossCSheateWOzdemirogluEFryCTomlinsonPFoanC, 2005, “Emerging approaches to integrated appraisal in the UK”Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal23113–123
16.
HayCRichardsD, 2000, “The tangled webs of Westminster and Whitehall: The discourse, strategy and practice of networking within the British Core Executive”Public Administration781–28
17.
HertinJTurnpennyJJordanANilssonMRusselDNykvistB, 2009, “Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process”Environment and Planning A forthcoming
18.
HMG, 2005Securing the Future: Delivering the UK Sustainable Development StrategyHer Majesty's Government (The Stationery Office, London)
JordanALenschowA (Eds), 2008Innovation in Environmental Policy (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
21.
JordanGHalpinD, 2006, “The political costs of policy coherence: Constructing rural policy for Scotland”Journal of Public Policy2621–41
22.
KiddSFischerT B, 2007, “Towards sustainability: Is integrated appraisal a step in the right direction?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25233–249
23.
LenschowA (Ed.), 2002Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe (Earthscan, London)
24.
LindblomC, 1979, “Still muddling, not yet through”Public Administration Review39517–525
25.
MarchJ GOlsenJ P, 1989Rediscovering Organisations: The Organisational Basis of Politics (The Free Press, New York)
26.
MarchJ GOlsenJ P, 1994, “Institutional perspectives on governance”, WP 94/2, ARENA, University of Oslo, Blindem, Oslo
27.
MarshDRhodesR, 1992Policy Networks in British Government (Clarendon, Oxford)
NAO, National Audit Office, London2004, “Evaluation of regulatory impact assessments compendium report 2003–04”, report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 358 session 2003–2004, http://nao.org.uk/publications//nao_reports/03-04/0304358.pdf
30.
NAO, National Audit Office, London2005, “Evaluation of regulatory impact assessments compendium report 2004–05”, report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 341 session 2004–2005, http://nao.org.uk/publications//nao_reports/04-05/0405341.pdf
31.
NAO, National Audit Office, London2006Regulatory Impact Assessments and Sustainable Development
32.
NilssonMJordanATurnpennyJHertinJNykvistBRusselD, 2009, “The use and non-use of policy appraisal in public policy making: An analysis of three European countries and the European Union”Policy Sciences (in press)
33.
NutleyS MWalterIDaviesH T O, 2007Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services (The Policy Press, Bristol)
34.
OECD, 1996Performance Auditing and the Modernisation of Government (OECD, Paris)
OECD, 2002Improving Policy Coherence and Integration for Sustainable Development Policy Brief, October (OECD, Paris)
37.
OwensS, 2005, “Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30287–292
38.
OwensSRaynerTBinaO, 2004, “New agendas for appraisal: Reflections on theory, practice, and research”Environment and Planning A361943–1959
39.
PageE C, 2005, “Joined-up government and the Civil Service”, in Joined-up Government Ed. BogdanorV (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 139–155
40.
RadaelliC, 1995, “The role of knowledge in the policy process”Journal of European Public Policy2159–183
41.
RadaelliC, 2004, “The diffusion of regulatory impact analysis—best practice or lesson-drawing?”European Journal of Political Research43723–747
42.
RadaelliC, 2005, “Diffusion without convergence: How political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment”Journal of European Public Policy12924–943
43.
RhodesR A W, 1997Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks)
44.
RusselD, 2007, “The United Kingdom's sustainable development strategies: Leading the way or flattering to deceive?”European Environment17189–200
45.
RusselDJordanA, 2007, “Gearing up government for sustainable development: Environmental policy appraisal in central government”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management151–22
46.
SabatierP A, 1998, “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe”Journal of Public Policy598–130
47.
ScraseJ ISheateW R, 2002, “Integration and integrated approaches to assessment: What do they mean for the environment?”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning4275–294
48.
SteurerRMartinuzziA, 2005, “Towards a new pattern of strategy formation in the public sector: First experiences with national strategies for sustainable development in Europe”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23455–472
49.
WCED, 1987Our Common FutureWorld Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
50.
WeissC, 1979, “The many meanings of research utilization”Public Administration Review39426–431
51.
WilkinsonD, 2004, “The magic bullet? Is ex ante impact assessment the key to advancing environmental policy integration?”, Environmental Policy Integration, Paper 4, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
