Although transparency is a key concept in the social sciences, it remains an understudied phenomenon in global environmental governance. This paper analyzes effectiveness of ‘governance by transparency’ or governance by information disclosure as a key innovation in global environmental and risk governance. Information disclosure is central to current efforts to govern biosafety or safe trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Through analyzing the dynamics of GMO-related information disclosure to the global Biosafety Clearing House (BCH), I argue that the originally intended normative and procedural aims of disclosure in this case—to facilitate a GMO-importing country's right to know and right to choose prior to trade in GMOs—are not yet being realized, partly because the burden of BCH disclosure currently rests, ironically, on importing countries. As a result, BCH disclosure may even have market-facilitating rather than originally intended market-regulating effects with regard to GMO trade, turning on its head the intended aims of governance by disclosure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BäckstrandK, 2006, “Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness”European Environment16(5) 290–306
2.
BailCFalknerRMarquardH, (Eds), 2002Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? (Earthscan, London)
3.
BebbingtonJThomsonI, 2007, “Social and environmental accounting, auditing and reporting: A potential source of organisational risk governance?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2538–55
4.
BeierleT, 2004, “The benefits and costs of disclosing information about risks: What do we know about right-to-know?”Risk Analysis24335–346
5.
BernsteinS, 2002, “Liberal environmentalism and global environmental governance”Global Environmental Politics2(3) 1–16
6.
BiermannF, 2001, “Big science, small impacts—in the South? The influence of global environment assessments on expert communities in India”Global Environmental Change11297–309
7.
BiermannF, 2002, “Institutions for scientific advice: Global environmental assessments and their influence in developing countries”Global Governance8195–219
8.
BiermannF, 2007, “‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research”Global Environmental Change17326–337
9.
BrownHde JongMLevyD, 2009, “Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI sustainability reporting”Journal of Cleaner Production17571–580
10.
BrownN, 2002, “Transparency—the very idea”, paper presented at the Royal Society for the Art seminar on Transparency in Public and Corporate Life, London, 19 September; copy available from the author
11.
CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity2008a, “Monitoring and reporting under the Protocol (Article 33): Analysis of information contained in the first national reports”, Note by the Executive Secretary, UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/4/13, 4 February
12.
CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity2008b, “Operation and activities of the Biosafety Clearing House”, Note by the Executive Secretary, UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/4/3, 29 February
13.
CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity2008c, “Report of the 2007 Survey of Biosafety Clearing-House users”, Note by Executive Secretary, UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/4/INF/20, 3 March
14.
ChanSPattbergP, 2008, “Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: Analyzing global forest governance”Global Environmental Politics8(3) 103–121
15.
ClappJ, 2007, “Illegal GMO releases and corporate responsibility: Questioning the effectiveness of voluntary measures”Ecological Economics66348–358
DingwerthK, 2007The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy. (Palgrave, Basingstoke, Hants)
18.
DryzekJ, 1999, “Transnational democracy”The Journal of Political Philosophy7(1) 30–51
19.
EEA, 2001, “Reporting on environmental measures: Are we being effective?”, Environmental Issue Report 25, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
20.
EssexJ, 2008, “Biotechnology, sound science, and the Foreign Agricultural Service: A case study in neoliberal rollout”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26191–209
FungAGrahamMWeilD, 2007Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
28.
GouldsonA, 2004, “Risk, regulation and the right to know: Exploring the impacts of access to information on the governance of environmental risk”Sustainable Development12136–149
29.
GouldsonABebbingtonJ, 2007, “Corporations and the governance of environmental risk”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy254–20
30.
GrahamM, 2002Democracy by Disclosure: The Rise of Technopopulism (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC)
31.
GulbrandsenL, 2008, “Accountability arrangements in non-state standard organizations: Instrumental design and imitation”Organization15563–583
32.
GuptaA, 2000, “Governing trade in genetically modified organisms: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety”Environment42(4) 23–33
33.
GuptaA, 2004, “When global is local: Negotiating safe use of biotechnology”, in Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance Eds JasanoffSLong-MartelloM, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 127–148
34.
GuptaA, 2006, “Problem framing in assessment processes: The case of biosafety”, in Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence Eds MitchellRClarkWCashDDicksonN, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 57–86
35.
GuptaA, 2008a, “Transparency under scrutiny: Information disclosure in global environmental governance”Global Environmental Politics8(2) 1–7
36.
GuptaA, 2008b, “Effective participation in the Biosafety Clearing House: Participation options and impediments to information provision”, report prepared for the UNEP-GEF Biosafety Clearing House Capacity Building Project, Geneva, http://www.enp.wur.nl/UK/scienceforimpact/Technical+reports/
37.
GuptaA, 2010, “Transparency as contested political terrain: Who knows what about the global GMO trade and why does it matter?”Global Environmental Politics August, forthcoming
38.
GuptaAFalknerR, 2006, “The influence of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Comparing Mexico, China and South Africa”Global Environmental Politics6(4) 23–55
39.
JansenK, 2008, “The unspeakable ban: The translation of global pesticide governance into Honduran national regulation”World Development36575–589
40.
JansenKGuptaA, 2009, “Anticipating the future: ‘biotechnology for the poor’ as unrealized promise?”Futures41436–445
41.
JasanoffS, 1990The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Makers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
42.
JasanoffS, (Ed.), 2004States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order (Routledge, New York)
43.
KeohaneR, 2006, “Accountability in world politics”Scandinavian Political Studies29(2) 75–87
44.
KolkALevyDPinkseJ, 2008, “Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure”European Accounting Review17719–745
45.
KonarSCohenM, 1997, “Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management32109–124
46.
LangleyP, 2001, “Transparency in the making of global environmental governance”Global Society15(1) 73–92
47.
LevidowLCarrS, 2007, “Europeanising advisory expertise: The role of ‘independent, objective, and transparent’ scientific advice in agri-biotech regulation”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25880–895
48.
LiebermanSGrayT, 2008, “GMOs and the developing world: A precautionary interpretation of biotechnology”British Journal of Politics and International Relations10395–411
49.
LordK, 2006The Perils and Promise of Global Transparency (SUNY Press, New York)
50.
MacDonaldS, 1998, “Transparency in Thailand's 1997 economic crisis: The significance of disclosure”Asian Survey38688–702
51.
MasonM, 2005The New Accountability: Environmental Responsibility Across Borders (Earthscan, London)
52.
MasonM, 2008, “Transparency for whom? Information disclosure and power in global environmental governance”Global Environmental Politics8(2) 8–13
53.
MitchellR, 1998, “Sources of transparency: Information systems in international regimes”International Studies Quarterly42109–130
54.
MolA, 2006, “Environmental governance in the Information Age: The emergence of informational governance”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24497–514
55.
MolA, 2008Environmental Reform in the Information Age: The Contours of Informational Governance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
56.
NewellP, 2003, “Globalization and the governance of biotechnology”Global Environmental Politics3(2) 56–71
57.
NewellP, 2005, “Citizenship, accountability and community: The limits of the CSR agenda”International Affairs81541–557
58.
PattbergP, 2007Private Institutions and Global Governance. The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
59.
PattbergPEnechiO, 2009, “The business of transnational climate governance: Legitimate, accountable, and transparent?”St Anthony's International Review5(1) 76–98
Rowen-RobinsonAWaltonWRothnieJ, 1996, “Public access to environmental information: A means to what end?”Journal of Environmental Law8(1) 19–42
62.
SoederbergS, 2001, “Grafting stability onto globalization? Deconstructing the IMF's recent bid for transparency”Third World Quarterly22849–864
63.
StasavageD, 2003, “Transparency, democratic accountability and the economic consequences of monetary institutions”American Journal of Political Science47389–402
64.
StephanM, 2002, “Environmental information disclosure programmes: They work but why?”Social Science Quarterly83190–205
65.
UNEP-GEF, undated, “Building capacity for effective participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH) of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety”, UNEP-GEF BCH Project Brochure, UNEP-GEF Biosafety Unit, Geneva
66.
van den BurgS, 2004, “Informing or empowering? Disclosure in the United States and the Netherlands”Local Environment9367–381
67.
van KersbergenKvan WaardenF, 2004, “‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and the problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy”European Journal of Political Research43143–171
68.
YoungO, (Ed.), 1999The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
