Spatial concentrations of worklessness remained a key characteristic of labour markets in advanced industrial economies, even during the period of decline in aggregate levels of unemployment and economic inactivity evident from the late 1990s to the economic downturn in 2008. The failure of certain localities to benefit from wider improvements in regional and national labour markets points to a lack of effectiveness in adopted policy approaches, not least in relation to the governance arrangements and policy delivery mechanisms that seek to integrate residents of deprived areas into wider local labour markets. Through analysis of practice in the British context, we explore the difficulties of integrating economic and social policy agendas within and across spatial scales to tackle problems of concentrated worklessness. We present analysis of a number of selected case studies aimed at reducing localised worklessness and identify the possibilities and constraints for effective action given existing governance arrangements and policy priorities to promote economic competitiveness and inclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeattyCFothergillSGoreTGreenA, 2002, “The real level of unemployment”, Centre for Regional Economics and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
2.
BrennanARhodesJTylerP, 2000, “The nature of local area social exclusion in England and the role of the labour market”Oxford Review of Economic Policy16129–146.
3.
CasebourneJDavisSPageR, 2006, “Review of Action Teams for Jobs”, RR 328, Department for Work and Pensions, London.
4.
CheshirePMonastiriotisVSheppardS, 2003, “Income inequality and residential segregation: Labour market sorting and the demand for positional goods”, in Geographies of Labour Market Inequality Eds MartinRMorrisonP, (Routledge, London) pp 83–109.
5.
CochraneAEtheringtonD, 2007, “Managing local labour markets and making up new spaces of welfare”Environment and Planning A392958–2974.
6.
CRESR, 2005, “New deal for communities 2001–05: An interim evaluation”, RR 17, Centre for Regional Economics and Social Research, report for Neighbourhood Renewal Unit Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
7.
DewsonSCasebourneJDarlowAKrishnanS, 2007, “Evaluation of the Working Neighbourhoods pilot: Final report”, RR 411, Department for Work and Pensions, London.
8.
DWP, 2007, “Reducing dependency, increasing opportunity: Options for the future of welfare to work”, The Freud Report, Department of Work and Pensions, London.
9.
FullerCBennettR JRamsdenM, 2004, “Local government and the changing institutional landscape of economic development in England and Wales”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22317–347.
10.
GoodwinMJonesMJonesR, 2005, “Devolution, constitutional change and economic development: Explaining and understanding the new institutional geographies of the devolved UK territories”Regional Studies39421–436.
11.
GordonI, 2003, “Unemployment and spatial labour markets: Strong adjustment and persistent concentration”, in Geographies of Labour Market Inequality Eds MartinRMorrisonP, (Routledge, London) pp 55–82.
12.
GreenAOwenD, 1998Where are the Jobless? Changing Unemployment and Non-employment in Cities and Regions (Policy Press, Bristol).
13.
GreenAOwenD, 2006The Geography of Poor Skills and Access to Work (York Publishing Services, York).
14.
HaughtonGJonesMPeckJTickellAWhileA, 2000, “Labour market policy as flexible welfare: Prototype employment zones and the new workfarism”Regional Studies34669–680.
15.
HM Treasury, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Communities and Local Government, 2007Review of Sub-national Economic Development and RegenerationHM Treasury, London.
16.
ImrieRRacoM, (Eds), 2003Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy (Policy Press, Bristol).
17.
JessopB, 1994, “Post-fordism and the state”, in Post-Fordism Ed. AminA, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 251–279.
18.
JessopB, 2002The Future of the Capitalist State (Polity Press, Cambridge).
19.
LindsayCMcQuaidR, 2004, “Avoiding the McJobs: Unemployed job seekers and attitudes to service work”Work, Employment and Society18298–319.
20.
LuptonR, 2003Poverty Street: The Dynamics of Neighbourhood Decline and Renewal (Policy Press, Bristol).
21.
McQuaidRLindsayC, 2005, “The concept of employability”Urban Studies42197–219.
22.
MartinRMorrisonP, 2003, “Thinking about the geographies of labour”, in Geographies of Labour Market Inequality Eds MartinRMorrisonP, (Routledge, London) pp 3–20.
23.
NorthDSyrettS, 2008, “Making the links: Economic deprivation, neighbourhood renewal and scales of governance”Regional Studies42133–148.
24.
NorthDSyrettSEtheringtonD, 2007Devolution and Regional Governance: Tackling the Economic Needs of Deprived Areas (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York).
25.
PMSU, 2005Improving the Prospects of People Living in Areas of Multiple Deprivation in EnglandPrime Minister's Strategy Unit, The Cabinet Office, London.
26.
PowerA, 2000, “Poor areas and social exclusion”, in Social Exclusion and the Future of Cities Eds PowerAWilsonW J, CASE Paper 35, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (London School of Economics, London) pp 1–20.
27.
RhodesJTylerPBrennanA, 2007Evaluation of the Single Regeneration Budget: A Partnership for RegenerationDepartment for Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
28.
RhodesR, 1997Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks).
