With this study we aim to develop a theoretical understanding and to assess policy implications of cluster development in the context of a knowledge-driven, globalizing Asian economy. We will examine both the strengths and the limitations of recent biotechnology cluster policies in South Korea and Singapore. We argue that the two states share similar experiences in terms of the state's proactive role as a cluster creator, but that they have promoted biotechnology industry clusters in contrasting ways due to different national politics and political institutions. South Korea places more emphasis on endogenous capabilities, while Singapore highlights the importance of exogenous capabilities in biotechnology cluster development. By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of these contrasting cluster policies, we evaluate the long-standing debate between endogenism and exogenism in the study of regional development. Instead of these dualistic approaches, we employ a global production network analytical lens for understanding the dynamic interactions between localized growth factors (endogenous) and globalizing external factors (exogenous) in the context of Asian biotechnology cluster development. We adopt a multipart strategy that includes archives, surveys, in-depth interviews, and secondary source data collection in order to enhance the validity and reliability of the data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A *STAR, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
1997, “Annual report on bioindustry in Korea” (in Korean)
9.
2004, “Annual report on bioindustry in Korea” (in Korean)
10.
2005, “Annual report on bioindustry in Korea” (in Korean)
11.
2006, “Annual report on bioindustry in Korea” (in Korean)
12.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP, 2004, “Clusters and knowledge: A local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”Progress in Human Geography2831–56
13.
BenneworthPHenryN, 2004, “Where is the value added in the cluster approach? Hermeneutical theorizing, economic geography and clusters as a multiperspectival approach”Urban Studies411011–1023
BreschiSLissoniF, 2001, “Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey”Industrial and Corporate Change10975–1005
16.
BunnellTCoeN, 2001, “Spaces and scales of innovation”Progress in Human Geography25569–589
17.
ChangH J, 2007, “Globalization, global standards, and the future of East Asia”, in Global Challenges and Local Responses: The East Asian Experience Ed. ShinJ S (Routledge, London) pp 13–30
18.
ChangH JParkH JYooC G, 1998, “Interpreting the Korean crisis: Financial liberalization, industrial policy and corporate governance”, in Financial Liberalization and the Asian Crisis Eds ChangH JPalmaGWhittakerD H (Palgrave, London) pp 140–155
19.
CoeN, 1997, “US transnationals and the Irish software industry: Assessing the nature, quality and stability of a new wave of foreign direct investment”European Urban and Regional Studies4211–230
20.
CoeNKellyP F, 2000, “Distance and discourse in the local labour market: The case of Singapore”Area32413–422
21.
CoeNHessMYeungH W CDickenPHendersonJ, 2004, “‘Globalizing’ regional development: A global production networks perspective”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series29468–484
22.
CookeP, 1998, “Introduction: Origins of the concept”, in Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World Eds BraczykH JCookePHeidenreichM (UCL Press, London) pp 2–25
23.
CookeP, 2001a, “Biotechnology clusters in the UK: Lessons from localization in the commercialization of science”Small Business Economics1743–59
24.
CookeP, 2001b, “Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy”Industrial and Corporate Change10945–974
CookeP, 2002b, “Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters”Journal of Technology Transfer27133–145
27.
CookeP, 2002cKnowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage (Routledge, London)
28.
CookeP, 2004, “Editorial: The accelerating evolution of biotechnology clusters”European Planning Studies12915–920
29.
CookeP, 2008, “The evolution of biotechnology in bioregions and their globalization”International Journal of Biotechnology10476–495
30.
CookePHugginsR, 2004, “A tale of two clusters: High technology industries in Cambridge”International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations2112–132
31.
CookePMorganK, 1998The Association Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
CumbersAMacKinnonD, 2004, “Introduction: Clusters in urban and regional development”Urban Studies41959–969
33.
DunningJ H, 2000, “Regional, globalization, and the knowledge economy: The issues stated”, in Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge Economy Ed. DunningJ H (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 7–41
EPB, 1993New Economy Five-year Plan 93–97Economy Planning Board, Seoul
39.
FinegoldDWongP KCheahT C, 2004, “Adapting a foreign direct investment strategy to the knowledge economy: The case of Singapore's emerging biotechnology cluster”European Planning Studies12921–941
40.
FloridaR, 1995, “Toward the learning region”Futures27527–538
41.
Fromhold-EisebithM, 2002, “Regional cycles of learning: Foreign multinationals as agents of technological upgrading in less developed countries”Environment and Planning A342155–2173
42.
GereffiG, 1994, “The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks”, in Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism Eds GereffiGKorzeniewiczM (Praeger, Westport, CT) pp 95–122
43.
GereffiG, 1996, “Global commodity chains: New forms of co-ordination and control among nations and firms in international industries”Competition and Change1427–439
44.
GereffiGHumphreyJKaplinskyRSturgeonT, 2001, “Introduction: Globalization, value chains and development”Institute of Development Studies Bulletin321–8
45.
HallP, 2002Urban and Regional Planning4th edition (Routledge, London)
46.
HendersonJDickenPHessMCoeNYeungH W C, 2002, “Global production networks and the analysis of economic development”Review of International Political Economy9436–464
47.
HenryNPinchS, 2000, “Spatialising knowledge: Placing the knowledge community of Motor Sport Valley”Geoforum31191–208
48.
HessM, 2004, “Spatial relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness”Progress in Human Geography28165–186
49.
HumphreyJSchmitzH, 2001, “Governance in global value chains”Institute of Development Studies Bulletin321–13
50.
JohnsonC, 1982MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy 1925–1975 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
51.
KeebleDLawsonCMooreBWilkinsonF, 1999, “Collective learning processes, networking and ‘institutional thickness’ in the Cambridge Region”Regional Studies33319–333
52.
KIET, 2005, “Statistics on Korean bio-industry”, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, Seoul, http://www.kiet.re.kr/bio/main.jsp (in Korean)
53.
KimE M, 1993, “Contradictions and limits of a developmental state: With illustrations from the South Korean case”Social Problems40228–249
54.
KimH, 2007, “Regional innovation policy of South Korea, compared with, and learning from, the European Union”, paper presented at the European Union Center of Excellence and Center for East Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin–Madison, http://www.europeanstudiesalliance.org/calendar/sp07events/Kim_Paper.pdf
LeeY S, 2009, “Balanced developing in globalizing regional development?: Unpacking the new regional policy in South Korea”Regional Studies43353–367
58.
LeeY STeeY C, 2009, “Reprising the role of the developmental state in cluster development: The biomedical industry in Singapore”Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography3086–97
59.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales)”International Journal of Urban and Regional research23379–395
60.
MacKinnonDCumbersAChapmanK, 2002, “Learning, innovation and regional development: A critical appraisal of recent debates”Progress in Human Geography26293–311
61.
MacLeodG, 2001, “New regionalism reconsidered: Globalization, regulation and the recasting of political economic space”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25804–829
62.
MarkusenA, 1999, “Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies”Regional Studies33869–884
63.
MartinRSunleyP, 2003, “Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?”Journal of Economic Geography35–35
64.
MorganK, 1997, “The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal”Regional Studies31491–503
65.
MOST, 1993National Biotechnology Development Program ‘Biotech 2000’Ministry of Science and Technology, Seoul
OECD, 1999Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach (OECD, Paris)
68.
OECD, 2001Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems (OECD, Paris)
69.
OldsKYeungH W, 2004, “Pathways to global city formation: A view from the developmental city-state of Singapore”Review of International Political Economy11489–521
70.
ParkB-G, 2005, “Spatially selective liberalization and graduated sovereignty: Politics of neo-liberalism and ‘special economic zones’ in South Korea”Political Geography24850–873
71.
ParkB-GHillRSaitoA, 2009, “Introduction”, in Locating Neoliberalism in East Asia Eds ParkB-GSaitoAHillR (Blackwell, Chichester, W Sussex) (forthcoming)
72.
ParkS O, 2000, “Innovation systems, networks, and the knowledge-based economy in Korea”, in Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge Economy Ed. DunningJ H (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 328–347
73.
PerryM, 2004, “Business cluster promotion in New Zealand and the limits of exemplar clusters”Policy and Society2382–103
74.
PhelpsN, 2004, “Clusters, dispersion and the spaces in between: For an economic geography of the banal”Urban Studies41971–989
75.
PhelpsN, 2008, “Cluster or capture? Manufacturing foreign direct investment, external economies and agglomeration”Regional Studies42457–473
76.
PhillipsS MYeungH W, 2003, “A place for R&D? The Singapore Science Park”Urban Studies40707–732
77.
PorterM E, 1998, “Clusters and the new economies of competition”Harvard Business Review7677–90
78.
PorterM E, 2000, “Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy”Economic Development Quarterly1415–34
79.
SaxenianA, 1994Regional Advantages: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
80.
ScottA, 1993Technopolis: High Technology Industry and Regional Development in Southern California (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
ShahiG, 2004Bio Business in Asia (Bioenterprise Asia, Singapore)
83.
ShinJ S, 2007, “Globalization and challenges to the developmental state: A comparison between South Korea and Singapore”, in Global Challenges and Local Responses: The East Asian Experience Ed. ShinJ S (Routledge, London) pp 31–49
84.
SimmieJ, 2003, “Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge”Regional Studies37607–620
85.
SitathanT, 2002, “Singapore takes giant step into bio sciences”Asia Times 18 June
86.
StorperM, 1997The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy (Guilford Press, New York)
87.
WolfeD AGertlerM S, 2004, “Clusters from the inside and outside: Local dynamics and global linkages”Urban Studies411072–1093
88.
YeungH WPoonJPerryM, 2001, “Towards a regional strategy: The role of regional headquarters and regional offices in the Asia Pacific”Urban Studies38157–183
89.
YooJ K, 2005, “Innovative cluster policy and its future trajectories”, in Korean Peninsula's in Spatial Mapping and Balanced Development Strategies in the Era of Northeast Asia Eds SungK RLeeS HParkY H (Presidential Committee on Balanced National Development, Seoul) pp 279–306 (in Korean)
90.
YueC SLimJ J, 2002, “Singapore: A regional hub in ICT”, in Towards a Knowledge-based Economy: East Asia's Changing Industrial Geography Eds MasuyamaSVandenbrinkD (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore) pp 259–298
