The spatial concentration of socioeconomic disadvantage as a result of discriminatory practices presents a challenging scenario for policy intervention. In this paper I examine the European Union (EU) social exclusion approach in addressing socioeconomic disadvantage in deprived urban areas. I look at the Greek city of Komotini, a society fragmented along ethnic lines. I focus on the Turkish minority community and explore the creation of local governance structures aiming at tackling exclusion through enhanced participation in decision making. The concept of citizenship rights that guided local ‘exclusion’ policies exposes the differences in the de jure and the de facto rights of different groups in the city. The governance mode of participation, however, puts emphasis on coordination and consensus at the expense of local realities. EU participatory principles that take local networking dynamics for granted do not travel well in centralized governance frameworks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsonP, 1997, “Combating poverty and social exclusion in Europe”, The Social Quality of Europe Eds BeckW, Van Der MaesenL, WalkerA (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 145–176
2.
AdnettNHardyS, 2005The European Social Model: Modernization or Evolution? (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
3.
AnagnostouD, 2005, “Deepening democracy or defending the nation? The Europeanisation of minority rights and Greek citizenship”West European Politics28335–357
4.
AtkinsonR, 2000, “Combating social exclusion in Europe: the new urban policy challenge”Urban Studies371037–41055
5.
AtkinsonRDavoudiS, 2000, “The concept of social exclusion in the European Union: context, development and possibilities”Journal of Common Market Studies38427–448
6.
BossertWD'AmbrosioCPeragineV, 2007, “Deprivation and social exclusion”Economica74777–803
7.
BrubakerR, 1992Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
8.
ChorianopoulosI, 2002, “Urban restructuring and governance: north–south differences in Europe and the EU URBAN Initiative”Urban Studies39705–726
9.
ChorianopoulosI, 2005, “Tackling social exclusion in urban areas: a break with the past”, paper presented at the 3rd ECPR conference, Budapest, 8–10 September, section 16, panel 6; copy available from the author
10.
ChristopoulosDTsitselikisK, 2003, “Impasses in the treatment of minorities and homogenesis in Greece”Jahrbücher für Geschichte und Kultur Sudosteuropas581–93
DaviesJ S, 2005, “The social exclusion debate: strategies, controversies and dilemmas”Policy Studies263–26
17.
DaviesJ S, 2007, “The limits of partnership: an exit-action strategy for local democratic inclusion”Political Studies55779–800
18.
DochertyIGoodladRPaddisonR, 2001, “Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighbourhoods”Urban Studies382225–2250
19.
DragonasTFrangoudakiA, 2006, “Educating the Muslim minority in western Thrace”Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations1721–41
20.
EC, European Commission, Brussels
21.
1992aTowards a Europe of Solidarity: Intensifying the Fight against Social Exclusion, Fostering Integration COM(92) 542 final, 23 December
22.
1992b, “Council Recommendation 92/441/EEC of 24 June 1992 on common criteria concerning sufficient resources and social assistance in social protection systems”Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL245 26 August
23.
1993Medium-term Action Programme to Combat Exclusion and Promote Solidarity: A New Programme to Support and Stimulate Innovation COM(93) 435 final, 22 September
24.
1998Sustainable Urban Development in the European Union: A Framework for Action COM(1998) 605 final, 28 October
25.
2000, “Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union”Official Journal of the European CommunitiesC3641–22, 18 December
26.
2002a, “EU network of independent experts in fundamental rights: report on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union and its members states in 2002”
27.
2002bThe Programming of the Structural Funds 2000–2006: An Initial Assessment of the URBAN Initiative COM(2002) 308 final, 14 June
28.
2003Partnership with the Cities: The URBAN Community Initiative (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
29.
2004aJoint Report on Social Exclusion (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
30.
2004bCouncil Regulation: Laying Down General Provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund COM(2004) 492 final, 14 July
31.
2005aA New Framework Strategy for Multilinguilism COM(2005) 596 final, 22 November
2005c, “Regulation (EC) No 1888/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council”Official Journal of the European UnionL3091–8, 25 November
34.
2006Cohesian Policy and Cities: The Urban Contribution to Growth and Jobs in the Regions COM(2006) 385 final, 13 July
35.
2007aCohesion Policy 2007–13: Commentaries and Official Texts (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
36.
2007b, “Council regulation (EC) no 168/2007 of 15 February 2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights”Official Journal of the European UnionL531–14, 22 February
FerreraM, 1996, “The southern model of welfare in social Europe”Journal of European Social Policy617–37
40.
FletcherD R, 2002, “The Police Act and the recruitment of offenders: towards the limits of social exclusion”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20757–773
41.
GhoseR, 2005, “The complexities of citizen participation through collaborative governance”Space and Polity961–75
42.
GiddensA, 1996, “T. H. Marshall, the state and democracy”, Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall Eds BulmerM, ReesA M (UCL Press, London) pp 65–80
43.
HantraisL, 2007Social Policy in the European Union (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
JacobssonK, 2004, “Soft regulation and the subtle transformation of states: the case of EU employment policy”Journal of European Social Policy14355–370
47.
KaramessiniM, 2008, “Continuity and change in the southern European social model”International Labour Review14743–70
48.
KoppenjanJKlijnE H, 2004Managing Uncertainties in Networks: Public Private Controversies (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon)
49.
LabrianidisL, 2001, “‘Internal frontiers’ as a hindrance to development”European Planning Studies985–103
50.
LAI, 2006Urban Planning: Implementation Problems and Reform ProposalsLocal Authorities Institute, Athens
51.
LeontidouL, 2990The Mediterranean City in Transition: Social Change and Urban Development (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
52.
LeverJ, 2005, “Governmentalisation and local strategic partnerships: whose priorities?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23907–922
53.
LevitasR, 2003, “The idea of social exclusion”, in On-line Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Social Inclusion Research 27–28 March, Ottawa, Canadian Council on Social Development and Human Resources Development, Canada, http://www.ccsd.ca/events/inclusion/papers/index.htm
54.
LevitasR, 2005The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour (Palgrave Macmillan, London)
55.
LipietzA, 1987Mirages and Miracles: The Crisis of Global Fordism (Verso, London)
56.
MarshallT H, 1950Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
MitchellD, 2003The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space (Guilford Publications, New York)
59.
MouzelisNPagoulatosG, 2005, “Civil society and citizenship in postwar Greece”, Citizenship and the Nation State in Greece and Turkey Eds BirtekF, DragonaT (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon) pp 87–103
60.
MurieAMusterdS, 2004, “Social exclusion and opportunity structures in European cities and neighbourhoods”Urban Studies411441–1459
PainterJPhiloC, 1995, “Spaces of citizenship: an introduction”Political Geography14107–120
63.
PaulstonC BPeckhamD, 1998Linguistic Minorities in Central and Eastern EuropeMultilingual Matters Ltd, Clevedon
64.
PetrakosGPsycharisI, 2004Regional Development in Greece (Kritiki, Athens)
65.
PorteCPochetP, 2003, “The participative dimension of the OMC”, paper prepared for the conference ‘Opening the Open Method of Co-ordination’, Joint Saltsa, Observatoire social Européen, University of Madison–Wisconsin project (4–5 July 2003), http://www.eucenter.wisc.edu/OMC/Summer03Conf/delaPortePochetConf.pdf
66.
RoomG, 1997, “Poverty and social exclusion: the new European agenda for policy and research”, Beyond the Threshold Ed. RoomG (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 1–9
SamersM, 1998, “Immigration, ‘ethnic minorities’, and ‘social exclusion’ in the European Union: a critical perspective”Geoforum29123–144
69.
SibleyD, 1995Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West (Routledge, London)
70.
SibleyD, 1998, “The problematic nature of exclusion”Geoforum29119–123
71.
SilverH, 1994, “Social exclusion and social solidarity: three paradigms”International Labour Review133531–577
72.
SitaropoulosN, 2004, “Freedom of movement and the right to a nationality v ethnic minorities: the case of the ex-article 19 of the Greek Nationality Code”European Journal of Migration and Law6205–223
73.
SkelcherC, 2005, “Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrist, and the design of democratic governance”Governance1889–110
74.
SmithS J, 1995, “Citizenship: all or nothing”Political Geography14190–193
SyrettS, 1997, “The politics of partnership”European Urban and Regional Studies499–114
77.
TrubekD MTrubekL G, 2005, “Hard and soft law in the construction of social Europe: the role of the open method of co-ordination”European Law Journal11343–364
TsitselikisK, 2006, “Citizenship in Greece: present challenges for future changes”, Multiple Citizenship as a Challenge to European Nation-state Eds Kalekin-FishmanD, PitkanenP (Sense, Rotterdam) pp 145–170
WilliamsA, 1984Southern Europe Transformed: Political and Economic Change in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain (Harper and Row, London)
84.
ZeitlinJ, 2005, “The open method of co-ordination in action: theoretical promise, empirical realities, reform strategy”, The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies Eds ZeitlinJ, PochetP (Peter Lang, Brussels), pp 407–503
