Considerable public resources are devoted to the establishment and operation of business incubators (BIs), which are seen as catalysts for the promotion of entrepreneurship, innovation activities, and regional development. Despite the vast amount of research that focused on the effectiveness of incubator initiatives and how to measure incubator performance, there is still a lack of understanding of how to determine which incubators are more effective than others. On the basis of data from 410 graduate firms, we concentrate on this crucial question and compare the long-term effectiveness of five BIs in Germany by applying the multicriteria outranking technique ‘preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation’ (PROMETHEE). in particular, we investigate whether PROMETHEE is a well-suited methodological approach for evaluation and comparison in the specific context of business incubation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbduhMD'SouzaCQuaziABurleyH T, 2007, “Investigating and classifying clients' satisfaction with business incubator services”Managing Service Quality1774–91.
2.
Abu-TalebM FMareschalB, 1995, “Water resources planning in the Middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method”European Journal of Operational Research81500–511.
3.
AernoudtR, 2004, “Incubator: Tool for entrepreneurship?”Small Business Economics23127–135.
4.
AlbadviAChaharsooghiS KEsfahanipourA, 2007, “Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE”European Journal of Operational Research177673–683.
5.
AlmusM, 2002, “What characterizes a fast-growing firm?”Applied Economics341497–1508.
6.
Al-RashdanDAl-KloubBDeanAAl-ShemmeriT, 1999, “Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan”European Journal of Operational Research11830–45.
AutioEKauranenI, 1992, “Science parks as a tool of technology policy: Some empirical evidence”, International Congress on User–Producer Relationships in the Innovation Process, Six Countries Program, Espoo, Finland, 12–13 November.
9.
Bana e CostaC A, (Ed.), 1990Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid (Springer, Berlin).
10.
Bana e CostaC AStewartT JVansnickJ-C, 1997, “Multicriteria decision analysis: Some thoughts based on the tutorial and discussion sessions of the ESIGMA meetings”European Journal of Operational Research9928–37.
BergekANorrmanC, 2008, “Incubator best practice: A framework”Technovation2820–28.
13.
BigliardiBDormioA INosellaAPetroniG, 2006, “Assessing science parks' performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies”Technovation26489–505.
14.
BouyssouD, 1990, “Building criteria: A prerequisite for MCDA”, in Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid Ed. Bana e CostaC A, (Springer, Berlin) pp 58–78.
15.
BouyssouDPernyP, 1992, “Ranking methods for valued preference relations: A characterization of a method based on leaving and entering flows”Journal of Operational Research61186–194.
16.
BransJ P, 1996, “The space of freedom of the decision maker: Modelling the human brain”European Journal of Operational Research92593–602.
17.
BransJ PMareschalB, 1990, “The PROMETHEE methods for MCDM: The PROMCALC, GAIA and BANKADVISER software”, in Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid Ed. Bana e CostaC A, (Springer, Berlin) pp 216–242.
18.
BransJ PMareschalB, 1994, “The PROMCALC and GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid”Decision Support Systems12297–310.
19.
BransJ PMareschalB, 2005, “PROMETHEE methods”, in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys Eds FigueiraJGrecoSEhrgottM, (Springer, New York) pp 163–195.
20.
BransJ PVinckeP, 1985, “A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making”Management Science31647–655.
21.
BransJ PVinckePMareschalB, 1986, “How to select and to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method”European Journal of Operational Research24228–238.
22.
BriggsTKunschP LMareschalB, 1990, “Nuclear waste management: An application of the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods”European Journal of Operational Research441–10.
23.
ButlerJJiaJDyerJ, 1997, “Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multicriteria decision models”European Journal of Operational Research103531–546.
24.
ChenS JHwangC L, 1992Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications (Springer, Berlin).
25.
ColomboMDelmastroM, 2002, “How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy”Research Policy311103–1122.
De BoerLVan der WegenLTelgenJ, 1998, “Outranking methods in support of supplier selection”European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management4109–118.
28.
De KeyserWPeetersP, 1996, “A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods”European Journal of Operational Research89457–461.
29.
DulminRMininnoV, 2003, “Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method”Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management9177–187.
FergusonROlofssonC, 2004, “Science parks and the development of NTBFs—location, survival and growth”Journal of Technology Transfer295–17.
32.
FigueiraJGrecoSEhrgottM, 2005Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (Springer, New York).
33.
FritschMMuellerP, 2004, “Effects of new business formation on regional development over time”Regional Studies38961–975.
34.
GoumasMLygerouV, 2000, “An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects”European Journal of Operational Research123606–613.
35.
GruppHLeglerHJungmittagASchmochU, 2000Hochtechnologie 2000: Neudefinition der Hochtechnologie für die Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähhigkeit Deutschlands [High technology 2000: A redefinition of the high-technology sector for the report on Germany's technological performance], Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe.
36.
GuitouniAMartelJ-M, 1998, “Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method”European Journal of Operational Research109501–521.
37.
HackettS MDiltsD M, 2004, “A systematic review of business incubation literature”Journal of Technology Transfer2955–82.
38.
HackettS MDiltsD M, 2008, “Inside the black box of business incubation: Study B-scale assessment, model refinement, and incubation outcomes”Journal of Technology Transfer33439–471.
39.
HannonP D, 2005, “Incubation policy and practice: Building practitioner and professional capability”Journal of Small Business Enterprise Development1257–78.
40.
HannonP DChaplinP, 2003, “Are incubators good for business? Understanding incubation practice—the challenges for policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21861–881.
41.
HyttiUMäkiK, 2007, “Which firms benefit most from the incubators?”International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management7506–523.
42.
KangasAKangasJPykäläinenJ, 2001, “Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning”Silva Fennica35215–227.
43.
LöfstenHLindelöfP, 2002, “Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms: Academic–industry links, innovation and markets”Research Policy31859–876.
44.
McAdamMMarlowS, 2007, “Building futures or stealing secrets? Entrepreneurial cooperation and conflict within business incubators”International Small Business Journal25361–379.
45.
MacharisCSpringaelJDe BruckerKVerbekeA, 2004, “PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP”European Journal of Operational Research153307–317.
MonckC S PPorterR BQuintasPStoreyD HWynarczykP, 1988Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms (Croom Helm, London).
48.
PeñaI, 2004, “Business incubation centers and new firm growth in the Basque country”Small Business Economics22223–236.
49.
PetersLRiceM, Sundararajan M, 2004, “The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process”Journal of Technology Transfer2983–91.
50.
PhanP HSiegelD SWrightM, 2005, “Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research”Journal of Business Venturing20165–182.
51.
RothaermelF TThursbyM, 2005, “Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages”Research Policy341076–1090.
52.
RothschildLDarrA, 2005, “Technological incubators and the social construction of innovation networks: An Israeli case study”Technovation2559–67.
53.
RousisKMoustakasKMalamisSPapadopoulosALoizidouM, 2008, “Multi-criteria analysis for the determination of the best WEEE management scenario in Cyprus”Waste Management281941–1954.
54.
RoyB, 1990, “Decision-aid and decision-making”, in Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid Ed. Bana e CostaC A, (Springer, Berlin) pp 17–35.
55.
RoyB, 1991, “The outranking approach and the foundations of the ELECTRE methods”Theory and Decision3149–73.
56.
SaatyT L, 1980The Analytical Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, New York).
57.
SchwartzMHornychC, 2008, “Specialization as strategy for business incubators: An assessment of the Central Germany Multimedia Center”Technovation28436–449.
58.
SeegerH, 1997Ex-post Bewertung der Technologie- und Gründerzentren durch die erfolgreich ausgezogenen Unternehmen und Analyse der einzel- und regionalwirtschaftlichen Effekte [Ex post assessment of innovations centers through successful graduates and an analysis of their effects on firms and regions] (Lit-Verlag, Münster).
59.
SquicciariniM, 2008, “Science parks' tenants versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model”Journal of Technology Transfer3345–71.
60.
SteinkühlerR H, 1994Technologiezentren und Erfolg von Unternehmensgründungen [Technology centers and the success of start-ups] (DUV, Wiesbaden).
61.
SternbergR, 1990, “The impact of innovation centres on small technology-based firms: The example of the federal republic of Germany”Small Business Economics22105–118.
62.
SternbergR, 2004, “Technology centres in Germany: Economic justification, effectiveness and impact on high-tech regions”International Journal of Technology Management2844–469.
63.
SternbergRBehrendtHSeegerHTamásyC, 1997Bilanz eines Booms: Wirkungsanalyse von Technologie- und Gründerzentren in Deutschland [Evaluation of innovation centers in Germany] (Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau- und Planungsliteratur, Dortmund).
64.
StoreyD JStrangeA, 1992, “Where are they now? Some changes in firms located on UK Science Parks in 1986”New Technology, Work and Employment115–28.
65.
StoreyD JTetherB S, 1998, “Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union”Research Policy261037–1057.
66.
TamásyC, 2002, “Are there too many innovation centres in Germany?”, in Technological Change and Regional Development in Europe Eds SchätzlLDiezJ R, (Physica, Heidelberg) pp 112–131.
67.
TamásyC, 2007, “Rethinking technology-oriented business incubators: Developing a robust policy instrument for entrepreneurship, innovation, and regional development?”Growth and Change38460–473.
68.
ThiersteinAWilhelmB, 2001, “Incubator, technology, and innovation centres in Switzerland: Features and policy implications”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development13315–331.
69.
TöttermanHStenJ, 2005, “Start-ups: Business incubation and social capital”International Small Business Journal23487–511.
70.
VedovelloC, 1997, “Science parks and university–industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force”Technovation17491–502.
71.
VinckeP, 1992Multi-criteria Decision Aid (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex).
72.
WeinzimmerL GNystromP CFreemanS J, 1998, “Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines”Journal of Management24235–262.
73.
WestheadP, 1997, “R&D ‘inputs’ and ‘outputs’ of technology-based firms located on and off Science Parks”R&D Management2745–62.
74.
WestheadPBatstoneS, 1998, “Independent technology-based firms: The perceived benefits of a science park location”Urban Studies352197–2219.
75.
WestheadPStoreyD J, 1994An Assessment of Firms Located on and Off Science Parks in the United Kingdom: Main Report (HMSO, London).
