In this paper I discuss the role of local politicians in representing, mediating, and balancing growth interests and local community interests in Norway, a country that has introduced market-oriented reforms in urban planning, giving private developers a prominent role. On the basis of a broad survey and qualitative case studies I found that local community actors predominantly confront local politicians, not planners or developers, to have their voices heard. Local community actors have few institutionalized arenas for their voices in the early phases, as mandatory involvement (public hearings, complaints) is to be found only in later phases. Thus, the arenas are predominantly accommodating ‘passive participation’, the opportunity to react and protest only on already formulated proposals. Local politicians have an important role in channelling citizen input into decision making, even if the contact is mostly informal. Developers are given the proactive, constructive role, as almost all municipalities studied have institutionalized arenas for interaction between planners and developers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AggerA, 2005Demokrati og Deltakelse: Et Borgerperspektiv på Kvarterløft PhD thesis, Danish Building Research Institute, Copenhagen.
2.
AggerALöfgrenK, 2008, “Democratic assessment of collaborative planning processes”Planning Theory7145–164.
3.
AlbrechtsLMandelbaumS J, 2005The Network Society: A New Context for Planning (Routledge, London).
4.
AlmondG AVerbaS, 1964The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
5.
ArnsteinS, 1969, “A ladder of citizen participation in the USA”Journal of the American Institute of Planners35216–224.
6.
AskimJHanssenG S, 2008, “Councillors; receipt and use of citizen input: Experience from Norwegian local government”Public Administration86387–409.
7.
BarnesMNewmanJKnopsASullivanH, 2003, “Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation”Public Administration81379–399.
8.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 2005, “Shared visions, unholy alliances: Power, governance and deliberative processes in local transport planning”Urban Studies422123–2144.
9.
BinghamL BNabatchiRO'LearyR, 2005, “The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government”Public Administration Review65547–558.
10.
BorrudE, 2005Bitvis Byutvikling: Mote Mellom Privat Eiendomsutvikling og Offentlig Byplanlegging Utkast til doktoravhandling (Arkitekthøgskolen, Oslo).
11.
BurnsD, 2000, “Can local democracy survive governance?”Urban Studies37963–973.
12.
CardosoRBreda-VazquezI, 2009, “The institutionalization of just decision making: Analyzing planning practice in Portugal”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27413–432.
13.
ChristensenTLasgreid (Eds), 2001New Public Management: The Transformation of Theory and Practice (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
14.
ChristophersenJ A, 1993Representant og Velger (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo).
15.
ColemanS, 2005, “New mediation and direct representation: Reconceptualizing representation in the digital age”New Media and Society7177–198.
16.
CopusC, 2003, “Re-engaging citizens and councils: The importance of the councillor to enhanced citizen involvement”Local Government Studies2932–51.
17.
CorriganPJoyceP, 2000, “Reconnecting to the public”Urban Studies371771–1779.
18.
DahlR A, 1971Polyarchy, Participation and Opposition (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
19.
DahlR ATufteE R, 1973Size and Democracy (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
20.
DavidoffP, 1965, “Advocacy and pluralism in planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners31103–115.
21.
EdelenbosJKlijnE, 2006, “Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6417–446.
22.
EllisG, 2004, “Discourses of objection: Towards an understanding of third-party rights in planning”Environment and Planning A361549–1570.
23.
FainsteinS S, 2000, “New directions in planning theory”Urban Affairs Review35451–478.
24.
FallethEHanssenG S, 2009, “Deltakelse og innflytelse i byplanleggingen: En undersøkelse av reguleringsplanprossesser”Kart og Plan 2009/1 102(1) 46–56.
25.
FallethEHanssenG SSaglieI L, 2008, “Medvirkning i byplanlegging i Norge”, NIBR report 2008:37, Norsk Institutt for by- og regionforskning, Oslo.
26.
FimreiteA LMedalenT, (Eds), 2005Governance i Norske Storbyer: Mellom Offentlig og Privat Initiativ (Scandinavian Academic Press, Oslo).
27.
FontanJ MHamelPMorinRShraggeE, 2009, “Community organisations and local governance in a metropolitan region”Urban Affairs Review44832–857.
28.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
29.
ForesterJ, 1993Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism (University of New York Press, Alany, NY).
ForesterJ, 2006, “Making participation work when interests conflict”Journal of American Planning Association72447–456.
32.
FraserJLepofskyJ, 2004, “The uses of knowledge in neighbourhood revitalization”Community Development Journal394–12.
33.
GoldsmithMLarsenH, 2004, “Local political leadership: Nordic style”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28121–133.
34.
GonzalezSHealeyP, 2005, “A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity”Urban Studies422055–2069.
35.
GrantJ, 2009, “Experiential planning: A practitioner's account of Vancouver's success”Journal of the American Planning Association75358–370.
36.
HansenK, 2001, “Local councilors: Between local ‘government’ and local ‘governance”’Public Administration79105–123.
37.
HansenT, 1980, “The politics of local planning in Norway”Political Science Review1168–186.
38.
HanssenG S, 2007, “ICT in Norwegian local government: Empowering the politicians?”Local Government Studies33355–382.
39.
HanssenG S, 2008, “E-communication: Strengthening the ties between councillors and citizens in Norwegian local government?”Scandinavian Political Studies31333–361.
40.
HanssenG S, forthcoming, “Politicians meta-governors in neo-liberal urban planning”, to be submitted to Local Government Studies autumn 2009.
41.
HanssenG SKlausenJ EVaboS I, 2006, “Traces of governance: Policy networking in Norwegian local government”, in Legitimacy and Urban Governance: A Cross-national Comparative Study Eds HeineltHSweetingDGetimisP, (Routledge, London) pp 90–101.
42.
HealeyP, 1997Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).
43.
HealeyP, 2003, “Collaborative planning in perspective”Planning Theory2101–123.
44.
HolmA, 2007, “Den kommunale boligpolitikken som møteplass for ulike interesser: En studie av aktører, arenaer og infflytelse innenfor den dommunale boligpolitikken”, Samarbeidsrapport NIBR/SINTEF/Byggforsk/NOVA 2007.
45.
HolsenT, 2000, “Medvirkning som begrep i plan- og bygningsloven”, Notater for planlovutvalget, Notat 2000/3, Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning, Oslo.
46.
InnesJ EBooherD, 2004, “Refraining public participation strategies for the 21st century”Planning Theory and Practice5419–436.
47.
IrvinRStansburyJ, 2004, “Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?”Public Administration Review6454–65.
48.
JensenAAndersenJHansenO HNielsenK Aagaard, 2007Plantœgning i Teori og Praksis: Et Tvœrfagligt Perspektiv (Roskilde Universitetsfrolag, Roskilde).
49.
KlijnE HKoppenhanJFM, 2000, “Politicians and interactive decision making: Institutional spoilsports or playmakers”Public Administration78365–387.
50.
KooimanJ, 1993Modern Governance: New Government – Society Interactions (Sage, London).
51.
KooimanJ, 2000, “Societal governance: Levels, models and orders of social – political interaction”, in Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy Ed. PierreJ, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 138–166.
52.
KOSTRA, 2008, “Public statistical data about Norwegian municipalities”, Kommune-Stat- Rapportering, Statistics Norway, http://www.ssb.no/emner/00/00/20/kostra/.
53.
LoganJMolotchH, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
54.
McCartyJ, 2007Partnership, Collaborative Planning and Urban Regeneration (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
55.
McKenzieE, 2005, “Constructing the Pomerium in Las Vegas: A case study of emerging trends in American gated communities”Housing Studies20203–234.
56.
MansbridgeJ, 1998, “The many faces of representation”, WP, Politics Research Group, John F Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, MA.
57.
MydskeP KClaesD HLieA, (Eds), 2007Nyliberalisme: Ideer og Politisk Virkelighet (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo).
58.
NordahlB, 2006Deciding on Development: Collaboration Between Markets and Local Governments PhD dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
59.
NordahlBBarlindhaugRRuudM E, 2007Markedsbasert Utbyggingspolitikk: Møte Mellom Kommune og Utbygger i Pressområder Samarbeidsrapport, Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning, Oslo.
60.
NysethT, 2008, “Network governance in contested urban landscapes”Planning Theory and Practice9497–514.
61.
PBA, 1985, “Planning and Buildings Act”, 14 June, number 77.
62.
PierreJPetersG, 2001Governance, Politics and the State (Macmillan, London).
63.
PitkinH F, 1967The Concept of Representation (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
64.
PløgerJ, 2001, “Public participation and the art of governance”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28219–241.
65.
RhodesR W, 1997Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability (Open University Press, Buckingham, Bucks).
66.
RommetvedtH, 2002Politikkens Allmenngjøring og den Nypluralistiske Parlamentarismen (Fagbokforlaget, Bergen).
67.
RosenGRazinA, 2009, “The rise of gated communities in Israel: Reflections on changing urban governance in a neo-liberal era”Urban Studies461702–1722.
68.
RøsnesA, 2005, “Byplannlegging: Fra regulativt hierarcki til nettverksmekanismer”, in Governance i Norske Storbyer: Mellom Offentlig og Privat Initiativ Eds FimreiteA EMedalenT, (Scandinavian Academic Press, Oslo) pp 65–96.
69.
SagerT, 2009, “Planners' role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities”European Planning Studies1765–84.
70.
SapotichneJJonesB DWolfeM, 2007, “Is urban politics a black hole? Analyzing the boundary between political science and urban politics”Urban Affairs Review4376–106.
71.
ScharpfF, 1993Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions (Campus, Frankfurt am Main).
72.
SehestedK, 2002Nœtverksstyring i Byer: Hvad Med Planlœgningen og Demokratiet? (Jurist-og økonomforbundets forlag, Copenhagen).
73.
SørensenETorfingJ, 2005, “The democratic anchorage of governance network”Scandinavian Political Studies28195–217.
74.
SSB, 2004Nøkkeltall om Informasjonssamfunnet 2004 (Statistisk Sentralbyrå, Oslo).
75.
StigenI MVaboS, 2001, “New public management: Inspirerte organisasjonsløsninger i norske kommuner-blir lokalpolitikken dum?”, in Lekmannsstyre Under Press Eds FimreiteA LLarsenH OAarsJ, (Kommuneforlaget, Oslo) pp 75–101.
76.
StokerG, 2000, “Urban political science and the challenge of urban governance”, in Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy Ed. PierreJ, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 91–109.
77.
TaitMCampbellH, 2000, “The politics of communication between planning officers and politicians: The exercise of power through discourse”Environment and Planning A32489–506.
78.
Tewdwr-JonesM, 2002, “Personal dynamics, distinctive frames and communicative planning”, in Planning Futures, New Directions for Planning Theory Eds AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM, (Routledge, London) pp 65–92.
79.
WinsvoldMStokkeK BKlausenJ ESaglieI L, 2009, “Organizational learning and governance in adaptation in urban development”, in Adaptation to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance” Eds NeiglWLorenzoniIO'BrianK, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 476–490.
80.
WøhniA, 2007Virker Medvirkning Virkelig? Evaluering av Planmedvirkning i Storbyene KS Sluttrapport (Asplan Viak AS, Oslo).
