Many US municipalities are engaged in climate mitigation planning, or efforts to reduce their communities' greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through land-use, transportation, and energy planning. However, they face a number of procedural and institutional obstacles that limit the adoption and implementation of those plans. The literature identifies some of the factors that lead municipalities to join relevant policy networks, but provides little guidance for overcoming the aforementioned obstacles and adopting policies to reduce community-wide GHG emissions. With this study I increase the understanding of climate mitigation planning by examining whether the adoption of these plans and policies is driven primarily by local demographic, economic, environmental, or political – institutional characteristics. My research is based upon a survey of 255 US municipalities. I combine the survey responses with secondary data and use multiple regression techniques to estimate the impact of fifteen demographic, political – institutional, economic, and environmental variables on the adoption of climate mitigation plans and policies. The influence of neighboring jurisdictions, the presence of staff members assigned to energy or climate planning, and the level of community environmental activism are found to have the greatest impact on climate mitigation policy adoption. These findings support the conclusion that the extent of climate mitigation planning is driven primarily by internal processes, and municipalities that are successful in this area do not fit any one profile according to their demographic, economic, or environmental characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaileyJ, 2007, “Lessons from the pioneers: tackling global warming at the local level”, Institute for Local Self Reliance, 1313 5th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, http://www.newrules.org/de/pioneers.pdf
2.
BerryFBerryD, 1990, “State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis”The American Political Science Review83395–415
3.
BetsillM, 2001, “Mitigating climate change in US cities: Opportunities and obstacles”Local Environment6393–406
4.
BetsillMBulkeleyH, 2004, “Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The Cities for Climate Protection program”International Studies Quarterly48471–493
5.
BetsillMBulkeleyH, 2006, “Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change”Global Governance12141–159
6.
BetsillMBulkeleyH, 2007, “Looking back and thinking ahead: A Decade of cities and climate change research”Local Environment12447–456
7.
BrownMLoganE, 2008, “The residential energy and carbon footprints of the 100 largest US metropolitan areas”, WP 39, Georgia Institute of Technology School of Public Policy, http://www.spp.gatech.edu/faculty/workingpapers/wp39.pdf
8.
BrownM ASouthworthF, 2008, “Mitigating climate change through green buildings and smart growth”Environment and Planning A40653–675
9.
BulkeleyH, 2000, “Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18727–748
10.
BulkeleyHBetsillM, 2003Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance (Routledge, London)
11.
CollierU, 1997, “Local authorities and climate protection in the European union: Putting subsidarity into practice? ”Local Environment239–57
12.
EasterlingWPolskyCGoodinDMayfieldMMuracoWYarnalB, 1998, “Changing places, changing emissions: The cross-scale reliability of greenhouse gas emission inventories in the US”Local Environment3247–262
13.
EwingRBartholomewKWinkelmanSWaltersJChenD, 2007, “Growing cooler: evidence on urban development and climate change”, Urban Land Institute, Chicago, IL
14.
GoreCRobinsonP, 2009, “Local government response to climate change: Our last, best hope? ”, in Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance Eds SelinHVanDeveerS (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 137–158
15.
GranbergMElanderI, 2007, “Local governance and climate change: Reflections on the Swedish experience”Local Environment12537–548
16.
GuptaJ, 2007, “The multi-level governance challenge of climate change”Environmental Sciences4131–137
17.
GuptaJLasageRStamT, 2007, “National efforts to enhance local climate policy in the Netherlands”Environmental Sciences4171–182
18.
GustavssonEElanderILundmarkM, 2009, “Multilevel governance, networking cities, and the geography of climate-change mitigation: Two Swedish examples”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2759–74
19.
HolgateC, 2007, “Factors and actors in climate change mitigation: A Tale of two South African cities”Local Environment12471–484
ICLEI, 2009c, “Measuring up: a detailed look at the impressive goals and climate action progress of US cities and counties”
24.
KahnM, 2006Green Cities: Urban Growth and the Environment (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC)
25.
KnuthSNagleBSteuerCYarnalB, 2007, “Universities and climate change mitigation: Advancing grassroots climate policy in the US”Local Environment12485–504
26.
KouskyCSchneiderS, 2003, “Global climate policy: Will cities lead the way? ”Climate Policy3359–372
27.
KronNRandolphJ, 1983, “Problems in implementing energy programs in selected United States communities”, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL
28.
LarsenHHertwichE, 2009, “The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action”Environmental Science and Policy12791–798
29.
LindsethG, 2004, “The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCPC) and the framing of local climate policy”Local Environment9325–336
30.
MathyS, 2007, “Urban and rural policies and the climate change issue: The French experience of governance”Environmental Sciences4159–169
31.
OsofskyHLevitJ, 2008, “The scale of networks?: Local climate change coalitions”Chicago Journal of International Law8409–436
32.
PanayotouT, 1997, “Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: Turning a black box into a policy tool”Environment and Development Economics2465–484
33.
ParkerPRowlandsI, 2007, “City partners maintain climate change action despite national cuts: Residential energy efficiency programme valued at local level”Local Environment12505–517
PittDRandolphJ, 2009, “Identifying obstacles to community climate protection planning”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27841–857
36.
RandolphJ, 2005, “Whatever happened to energy planning? ”, paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Kansas City, MO; copy available from J Randolph, Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
37.
RobinsonPGoreC, 2005, “Barriers to Canadian municipal response to climate change”Canadian Journal of Urban Research14 (supplement) 102–120
38.
Romero-LankaoP, 2007, “How do local governments in Mexico City manage global warming?”Local Environment12519–535
39.
SatterthwaiteD, 2008, “Cities' contribution to global warming: Notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions”Environment and Urbanization20539–549
40.
SelinHVanDeever, 2009Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
41.
SlocumR, 2004, “Consumer citizens and the Cities for Climate Protection campaign”Environment and Planning A36763–782
42.
SouthworthFSonnenbergABrownM, 2008, “The transportation energy and carbon footprints of the 100 largest US metropolitan areas”, WP 37, Georgia Institute of Technology School of Public Policy, http://www.spp.gatech.edu/faculty/workingpapers/wp37.pdf
43.
StoneBMednickAHollowayTSpakS, 2007, “Is compact growth good for air quality? ”Journal of the American Planning Association73404–418
44.
StorbjörkS, 2007, “Governing climate adaptation in the local arena: Challenges of risk management and planning in Sweden”Local Environment12457–469
VasiI, 2006, “Organizational environments, framing processes, and the diffusion of the program to address global climate change among local governments in the United States”Sociological Forum21439–466
51.
ZahranSBrodyS DVedlitzAGroverHMillerC, 2008a, “Vulnerability and capacity: Explaining local commitment to climate-change policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26544–562
52.
ZahranSGroverHBrodySVedlitzA, 2008b, “Risk, stress, and capacity: Explaining metropolitan commitment to climate protection”Urban Affairs Review43447–474
