Over 1000 US municipalities have formally committed to reduce their local greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through participation in one of several climate-protection networks. This has attracted the attention of researchers interested in theories of free riding and local political decision making who question why municipalities become engaged in this global effort. However, whereas joining a climate-protection network or adopting an emissions-reduction goal are relatively low-cost acts, the implementation of such policies entails higher costs. This raises legitimate questions about the extent and type of follow-through made on municipal climate-protection commitments. With this paper I begin to fill in the data gap around municipal climate-protection initiatives and construct an index that quantifies the GHG-reduction policies implemented by local governments. Data informing the index are collected on municipalities in the US state of Indiana and are used to test theories of local political decision making. Findings point to the important role that policy entrepreneurs play in advancing local climate protection as well as to the potential inadequacy of membership in climate-protection organizations as an indicator of increased implementation of GHG-reducing activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AallCGrovenKLindsethG, 2007, “The scope of action for local climate policy: The case of Norway”Global Environmental Politics783101
2.
AdelmanDEEngelKH, 2008, “Reorienting state climate change policies to induce technological change”Arizona Law Review50835879
3.
Association of American Geographers, 2003Global Change and Local Places: Estimating, Understanding, and Reducing Greenhouse Gases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
4.
BaiX, 2007, “Integrating global concerns into urban management: The scale and readiness arguments”Journal of Industrial Ecology111529
5.
BetsillM, 2001, “Mitigating climate change in US cities: Opportunities and obstacles”Local Environment6393406
6.
BetsillMBulkeleyH, 2004, “Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program”International Studies Quarterly48471493
7.
BrodySDZahranSVedlitzAGroverH, 2008, “Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States”Environment and Behavior407295
8.
BulkeleyHBetsillM, 2003Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance (Routledge, New York)
ClarkWC, 2003, “Urban environments: Battleground for global sustainability”Environment451
11.
CoenenFMenkveldM, 2003, “The role of local authorities in a transition towards a climate neutral society”, in Global Warming and Social Innovation: The Challenge of a Climate Neutral Society Eds KokMTJVermeulenWJVFaaijAPCde JagerD (Earthscan, London) pp 107125
12.
CorreiaFNFordhamMSaraivaMDGBernardoF, 1998, “Flood hazard assessment and management: Interface with the public”Water Resources Management12209227
13.
DanielsM, 2009, “Indiana says ‘no thanks’ to cap and trade”The Wall Street Journal 15 May, page A11
EngelKH, 2009, “Whither subnational climate change initiatives in the wake of federal climate legislation?”Publius: The Journal of Federalism39432454
16.
GuptaNBeehrTA, 1982, “A test of the correspondence between self-reports and alternative data sources about work organizations”Jounal of Vocational Behavior20113
17.
Indiana Democratic Party, 2009, “Elected officials”, Indian Democratic Party Headquarters, Indianapolis, IN, http://www.indems.org/
IPCC, 2007bClimate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva)
22.
KatesRWWilbanksTJ, 2003, “Making the global local: Responding to climate change concerns”Environment451223
23.
KoehnPH, 2008, “Underneath Kyoto: Emerging subnational government initiatives and incipient issue-bundling opportunities in China and the United States”Global Environmental Politics85377
24.
KouskyCSchneiderSH, 2003, “Global climate policy: Will cities lead the way?”Climate Policy3359372
LindsethG, 2004, “The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCPC) and the framing of local climate policy”Local Environment9325336
27.
LubellMFeiockRHandyS, 2009, “City adoption of environmentally sustainable policies in California's Central Valley”Journal of the American Planning Association75293308
28.
MolotchH, 1976, “The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place”The American Journal of Sociology82309332
29.
OlsonM, 1965The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
PodsakoffPMOrganDW, 1986, “Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects”Journal of Management12531544
32.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJYPodsakoffNP, 2003, “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”Journal of Applied Psychology88879903
RabeBG, 2004Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
35.
RothenbergL, 2002Environmental Choices: Policy Responses to Green Demands (CQ Press, Washington, DC)
36.
SatterthwaiteD, 2008, “Cities' contribution to global warming: Notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions”Environment and Urbanization20539549
37.
SchneiderMTeskeP, 1992, “Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government”The American Political Science Review86737747
38.
SippelMJenssenT, 2009, “What about local climate governance? A review of promise and problems”, discussion paper, Institute of Energy Economics and Rational Energy Use, University of Stuttgard, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1514334
The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University, 2004, “Indiana nonprofits searchable database”, Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, http://www.stats.indiana.edu/inp/INNonProfit.aspx
41.
TierneyKJLindellMKPerryRW, 2001Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States (Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC)
VerbaSLehmanKLBradyHNieNH, 1993, “Race, ethnicity and political resources: Participation in the United States”British Journal of Political Science23453497
47.
WheelerSM, 2008, “State and municipal climate plans”Journal of the American Planning Association74481497
48.
WienerJB, 2007, “Think globally, act globally: The limits of local climate policies.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review155101119
49.
ZahranSBrodySDVedlitzAGroverHMillerC, 2008a, “Vulnerability and capacity: Explaining local commitment to climate-change policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26544562
50.
ZahranSGroverHBrodySDVedlitzA, 2008b, “Risk, stress and capacity: Explaining metropolitan commitment to climate protection”Urban Affairs Review43447474
51.
ZiblattD, 2008, “Why some cities provide more public goods than others: A subnational comparison of the provision of public goods in German cities in 1912”Studies in Comparative International Development43273289
