Interest in environmental policy integration (EPI) has recently been strong, both in the literature and in practice. We explore Dutch initiatives to integrate noise management into spatial planning policy in light of the body of literature on EPI. The main approaches of EPI are translated into a conceptual framework consisting of organizational, procedural, and contextual factors. The objective of this literature review is to relate paradigm shifts and policy innovations regarding noise management and spatial planning to empirical windows of opportunity for and barriers to implementation of EPI. It shows how instruments allowing a flexible approach and deviation from standards at the local level fit in with the discourse on decentralized and area-oriented policy. The analysis suggests that procedural and decision-making rules and organizational arrangements can bridge implementation gaps in local-level planning practice. However, EPI in the Netherlands has not solved the noise problem, and the number of affected inhabitants is increasing. We conclude the paper by examining the conceptual and normative issues affecting the integration and prioritization of noise management policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
De RooG, 2000, “Environmental planning and the compact city, a Dutch perspective”, in Compact Cities and Sustainable Urban Development: A Critical Assessment of Policies and Plans from an International Perspective Eds De RooGMillerD (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 31–41
2.
De RooG, 2003Environmental Planning in the Netherlands: Too Good to be True (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
3.
De RooG, 2005, “The rise and fall of the environmental zone: A Discussion about area oriented environmental planning in urban areas”, in Urban Environmental Planning: Policies, Instruments and Methods in an International Perspective2nd edition, Eds MillerDDe RooG (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 161–168
4.
DriessenP P J, 2007, “A spatial perspective”, in Environmental Policy: Analysis and Perspective Eds DriessenP P JLeroyP (Coutinho, Bussum) pp 367–392
5.
DriessenP P JGlasbergenP, 2000, “The planning of main ports in The Netherlands: Innovative decision-making for complex environmental problems”, in Resolving Urban Environmental and Spatial Conflicts Eds MillerDDe RooG (Geo Press, Groningen) pp 223–238
6.
DriessenP P JGlasbergenP, 2002, “New directions in environmental politics: Concluding remarks”, in Greening Society: The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics Eds DriessenP P JGlasbergenP (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht) pp 245–262
7.
DriessenP P JGlasbergenPVerdaasC, 2001, “Interactive policy-making: A Model of management for public works”European Journal of Operational Research128322–337
8.
Evaluation Commission of City and Environment, 2004Effectiveness and Effects of the Experimental Law City and Environment Practice (VROM, The Hague) (in Dutch)
9.
FlipseL, 2007, “Environmental policy integration and spatial planning: an evaluation of the MILO and LOGO methodologies for integral environmental and spatial planning”, masters thesis, Department of Innovation and Environmental Sciences, University of Utrecht
10.
GlasbergenP, 2005, “Decentralized reflexive environmental regulation: Opportunities and risks based on an evaluation of Dutch experiments”Environmental Sciences2427–442
11.
HajerMZonneveldW, 2000, “Spatial planning in the network society: Rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands”European Planning Studies8337–355
12.
HealeyPShawT, 1994, “Changing meanings of ‘environment’ in the British planning system”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series18425–437
13.
HertinJBerkhoutF, 2003, “Analysing strategies for environmental policy integration: The case of EU enterprise policy”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning539–56
14.
HeyC, 2002, “Why does environmental policy integration fail? The case of environmental taxation for heavy goods vehicles”, in Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe Ed. LenschowA (Earthscan, London) pp 127–152
15.
JacobKVolkeryALenschowA, 2008, “Instruments for environmental policy integration in 30 OECD-countries”, in Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainability Eds JordanA JLenschowA (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 24–45
16.
JordanALenschowA, 2010, “Environmental policy integration: A State of the art review”Environmental Policy and Governance20147–158
17.
KiddS, 2007, “Towards a framework of integration in spatial planning: An exploration from a health perspective”Planning Theory and Practice8161–181
LaffertyW MHovdenE, 2003, “Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework?”Environmental Politics121–22
21.
LaffertyW MKnudsenJ, 2007, “The issue of ‘balance’ and trade-offs in environmental policy integration: how will we know EPI when we see it?”, EPIGOV paper 11, http://ecologic.eu.projekte/epigov/
22.
LaffertyW MRuudALarsenO M, 2004, “Environmental policy integration: how will we recognize it when we see it? The case of green innovation policy in Norway”, Program for Research and Documentation for a Sustainable Society, Centre for Development and Environment, University of Oslo
23.
LenschowA, 1997, “Variation in EC environmental policy integration: Agency push within complex institutional structures”Journal of European Public Policy4109–127
24.
LenschowA, 1999, “The greening of the EU: The Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural Funds”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1791–108
NilssonM, 2005, “Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: The case of Swedish energy policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23207–226
28.
NilssonMPerssonA, 2003, “Framework for analyzing environmental policy integration”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning5333–359
29.
NilssonMEklundMTyskengS, 2009, “Environmental integration and policy implementation: Competing governance modes in waste management decision making”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy271–18
30.
Noise Abatement Act, 1979Wet van 16 Februari 1979, Houdende Regels Inzake het Voorkomen of Beperken van Geluidhinder (Staatsblad, The Hague)
31.
PerssonA, 2004Environmental Policy Integration: An Introduction (Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm)
32.
PerssonA, 2006, “Different perspectives on EPI”, in Environmental Policy Integration in Practice: Shaping Institutions for Learning Eds NilssonMEckerbergK (Earthscan, London) pp 25–48
33.
RunhaarHDriessenP P JSoerL, 2009, “Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36417–431
SchoutAJordanA, 2008, “Administrative instruments”, in Innovation in Environmental Policy? Eds JordanALenschowA (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 49–69
36.
ThorborgH W MLeidelmeijerKDassenA G M, 2006, “Quality of life and liveability: towards policy evaluation and research”, report 500132001/2006, MNP, Bilthoven (in Dutch)
Van KampILeidelmeijerKMarsmanGde HollanderA, 2003, “Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: A Literature study”Landscape and Urban Planning655–18
39.
Van TatenhoveJ P MGoverdeH J M, 2002, “Strategies in environmental policy: A Historical institutional perspective”, in Greening Society: The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics Eds DriessenP P JGlasbergenP (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht) pp 47–63
40.
VNG, 2004Guidance Environmental Quality in the Living Conditions (VNG International, The Hague) (in Dutch)
41.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague1988Fourth National Policy Document on Spatial Planning TK 20 490
42.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague1989National Environmental Policy Plan TK 21 137
43.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague1990Area-oriented Environmental Policy TK 21 896
44.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague1993National Environmental Policy Plan-2 TK 23 560
45.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague1998Letter to ROM Evaluation Report TK 25 600 XI (48)
46.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague2001Fourth National Environment Plan TK 27 664
47.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague2003Liveable Cities: A Dutch Recipe for Environmental Policy and Spatial Planning in the City and Environment Project
48.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague2006National Spatial Strategy TK 19 19–1390
49.
WealeA, 2009, “Governance, government and the pursuit of sustainability”, in Governing Sustainability Eds AdgerW NJordanA (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 55–75
