The Rural Development Commission (RDC) operates the Redundant Building Grant (RBG) which is designed to bring redundant buildings in certain rural areas into commercial activity. In this paper a recent evaluation of the grant is outlined. At the national level RDC data can be used to describe the key characteristics of the grant. This evaluation is primarily based on data obtained from more than 400 applicants in nine counties. This information is employed to assess RBG within three parameters; the property market; economic consequences; and performance impact measures. Policy issues are raised in relation to the specificity of RBG and deadweight.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archbishop's Commission on Rural Areas, 1990Faith in the Countryside (Church House Publishing, London)
2.
CameronG, 1990, “First steps in urban policy evaluation in the United Kingdom”Urban Studies27475–495
3.
DoE, 1985, “Five year review of the Birmingham Inner City Partnership”, Inner Cities Research Programme No. 12, Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 3EB
4.
DoE, 1986a, “Evaluation of environmental projects funded under the Urban Programme”, Inner Cities Research Programme, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
5.
DoE, 1986b, “Evaluation of industrial and commercial improvement areas”, Inner Cities Research Programme, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
6.
DoE, 1988a, “An evaluation of the Enterprise Zone experiment”, Inner Cities Research Programme, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
7.
DoE, 1988b, “An evaluation of the urban development grant programme”, Inner Cities Research Programme, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London)
8.
DoE and Welsh Office, 1987, “Rural enterprise and development”, Department of the Environment and Welsh Office (HMSO, London)
9.
FothergillSMonkSPerryM, 1987Property and Industrial Development (Hutchinson, London)
10.
House of Lords, 1990, “The future of rural society”, 24th report, Select Committee on the European Communities, Chairman Lord Middleton House of Lords Papers—Session 1989–9080, 3 volumes (HMSO, London)
11.
National Audit Office, 1988, “Department of the Environment: Urban development corporations”House of Commons Papers—Session 1987–88492 (HMSO, London)
12.
RDC, 1989a, “Guidance notes on the approval of Redundant Building Grants”, unpublished, Rural Development Commission, 141 Castle Street, Salisbury, Wilts SP1 4TP
RDC, 1990b, “Action for rural enterprise”, Rural Development Commission, 141 Castle Street, Salisbury, Wilts SP1 4TP
16.
RDC, 1990c, “An evaluation of the rural development programme process”, Rural Research Series 5, Rural Development Commission, 141 Castle Street, Salisbury, Wilts SP1 4TP
17.
StoreyD J, 1990, “Evaluation of policies and measures to create local employment”Urban Studies27669–684
18.
StoreyD JJohnsonS, 1987, “Are small firms the answer to unemployment?” (Employment Institute, London)
19.
TurokI, 1989, “Evaluation and understanding in local economic policy”Urban Studies26587–606
20.
TurokI, 1991, “Policy evaluation as science: A critical assessment”Applied Economics231543–1550
