With this paper I test the hypothesis that, by giving people more voice in the government decision-making process, fiscal decentralisation fosters social capital, measured in terms of interpersonal trust. Empirical evidence based on World Values Survey data and seemingly unrelated probit estimations for a cross-section of countries suggests that people living in federal and decentralised countries find it more important to have a voice in government decisions than their counterparts living in unitary and centralised countries. Provoice attitudes are, in turn, associated with greater social capital. The cross-country estimations are complemented by country-specific regressions for Brazil and Indonesia on account of these countries' experiences with fiscal decentralisation. The results show that the cohorts of individuals that have been exposed to decentralisation are in general more provoice (and trustful of strangers in the case of Brazil) than their counterparts that have not been exposed to decentralisation. These findings are not driven by the effects of political liberalisation on people's attitudes towards the importance of having a voice in government decisions and interpersonal trust.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AfonsoJ RDe MelloL, 2002, “Brazil: An evolving federation”, in Managing Fiscal Decentralization Eds AhmadETanziV (Routledge, London) pp 265–285
2.
AlesinaALa FerraraE, 2002, “Who trust others?”Journal of Public Economics85207–234
3.
AlmJAtenR HBahlR, 2001, “Can Indonesia decentralise successfully? Plans, problems and prospects”Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies3783–103
4.
AntlovH, 2005, “Filling the democratic deficit: Deliberative forums and political organisation in Indonesia”, in Southeast Asian Responses to Globalisation: Restructuring Governance and Deepening Democracy Eds WahLoh Kok FOjendalJ (Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Copenhagen) pp 233–258
5.
AspinallE, 2004, “Indonesia: Transformation of civil society and democratic breakthrough”, in Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) pp 61–96
6.
AspinallEFealyG (Eds), 2003Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation and Democratisation (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore)
7.
AvritzerL, 2000, “Democratization and changes in the pattern of association in Brazil”Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs4259–76
8.
BardhanPMookherjeeD, 2000, “Capture and governance at local and national levels”American Economic Review90135–139
9.
BeardV A, 2005, “Individual determinants of participation in community development in Indonesia”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2321–39
10.
BoothA, 2003, “Decentralisation and poverty alleviation in Indonesia”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21181–202
11.
BourdieuP, 1986, “The forms of capital”, in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education Ed. RichardsonJ G (Greenwood Press, New York) pp 241–258
12.
ChienS S, 2007, “Institutional innovations, asymmetric decentralization, and local economic development: A case study of Kunshan, in post-Mao China”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25269–290
13.
ColemanJ S, 1988, “Social capital in the creation of human capital”American Journal of Sociology9495–119
14.
ColemanJ S, 1990Foundations of Social Theory (Belknap, Cambridge, MA)
15.
CurtisJ EBaerD EGrabbE G, 2001, “Nations of joiner: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies”American Sociological Review66783–805
16.
De MelloL, 2004, “Can fiscal decentralisation strengthen social capital?”Public Finance Review324–35
ElazarD J, 1995, “From statism to federalism: A paradigm shift”Publius255–18
19.
FaguetJ P, 2004, “Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia”Journal of Public Economics88867–893
20.
FonsecaF, 2007, “Democracia e participação no Brazil: Descentralização e cidadania face ao capitalismo contemporâneo”Katálysis10245–255
21.
FreitagM, 2006, “Bowling the state back in: Political institutions and the creation of social capital”European Journal of Political Research45123–152
22.
HofmanBKadjatmikoKaiser KSjahrirB S, 2006, “Evaluating fiscal equalisation in Indonesia”, World Bank Policy Research, WP 3911, World Bank, Washington, DC
23.
HoogheM, 2003, “Participation in voluntary associations and value indicators: The effect of current and previous participation experiences”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly3247–69
24.
InglehartRBasanezMDiez-MedranoJHalmanLLuijkxR, 2004Human Beliefs and Values (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
25.
LetkiNEvansG, 2005, “Endogenizing social trust: Democratization in East-central Europe”British Journal of Political Science35515–529
26.
LeviM, 1996, “Social and unsocial capital: A review essay of Robert Putnam's making democracy work”Politics and Society2445–55
27.
LowndesVWilsonD, 2001, “Social capital and local governance: Exploring the institutional design variable”Political Studies49629–647
28.
MaloneyWSmithGStokerG, 2000, “Social capital and urban governance: Adding a more contextualised ‘top-down’ perspective”Political Studies48802–820
29.
MonfardiniCRadiceR, 2008, “Testing exogeneity in the bivariate probit model: A Monte Carlo study”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics70271–282
30.
MonteroA, 2000, “Devolving democracy: Political decentralisation and the new Brazilian federalism”, in Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions and Processes Eds KingstonP RPowerT J (University of Pittsburgh, PA) pp 58–76
31.
MullerE NSeligsonM A, 1994, “Civic culture and democracy: The question of causal relationships”American Political Science Review88635–652
32.
OffeC, 1999, “How can we trust our fellow citizens?”, in Democracy and Trust Ed. WarrenM E (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 42–87
33.
PaxtonP, 2002, “Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship”American Sociological Review67254–277
34.
Prud'hommeR, 1995, “On the dangers of decentralization”World Bank Research Observer10201–220
35.
PutnamR, 1993Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
36.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN, 2004, “Reassessing relations between the centre and the states: The challenge for the Brazilian administration”Regional Studies38833–844
37.
Rodríguez-PoseASandallR, 2008, “From identity to the economy: Analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2654–72
38.
SkocpolTGanzMMunsonZ, 2000, “A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States”American Political Science Review94527–561
39.
StolleD, 2003, “The sources of social capital”, in Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective (Palgrave, New York)
40.
TakeshiI, 2006, “The dynamics of local governance reform in decentralizing Indonesia: Participatory planning and village empowerment in Bandung, West Java.”Asian and African Area Studies5137–183
41.
TanziV, 1998, “Corruption around the world—causes, consequences, scope and cures”IMF Staff Papers45559–594
42.
TarrowS, 1994Power in Movement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
43.
TiksonD T, 2008, “Indonesia towards decentralisation and democracy”, in Foundations for Local Governance: Decentralization in Comparative Perspective Ed. SaitoF (Physica, Heidelberg) pp 25–46
44.
Van KlinkenG, 2008, “Indonesian politics in 2008: The ambiguities of democratic change”Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies44365–381
45.
WallisJDolleryB, 2002, “Social capital and local government capacity”Australian Journal of Public Administration6176–85
46.
WhitingEHarperR, 2003Young People and Social Capital. Office for National Statistics, London
47.
WildeJ, 2000, “Identification of multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors”Economics Letters69309–312
48.
WoodTMurrayW E, 2007, “Participatory democracy in Brazil and local geographies: Porto Alegre and Belo Horizonte compared”European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies8319–41
49.
World Bank, 2003Decentralizing Indonesia (World Bank, Jakarta)
