With this paper we study the impact of decentralization on turnout. We test the hypotheses that decentralization increases turnout in subnational elections, lowers participation in national elections, and reduces the gap between regional and national arenas. A comparative cross-national analysis does not show any significant effect of decentralization on turnout in national elections. But we take a closer look at two countries, Canada and Spain, where fiscal decentralization has taken place during the past decades. In both countries the empirical evidence suggests that decentralization has contributed to reducing the turnout gap between regional and national elections.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnduizaE, 1999, Individuos o sistemas? has razones de la abstención en Europa occidental. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid
2.
BélandDLecoursA, 2010, “Does nationalism trigger welfare-state disintegration? Social policy and territorial mobilization in Belgium and Canada”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28420–434
3.
BlackJ, 1991, “Reforming the context of the voting process in Canada: Lessons from other democracies”, in Voter Turnout in Canada Ed. BakvisH (Dundurn Press, Toronto, ON) pp 61–176
4.
BlaisA, 2000To Vote or not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory (Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh, PA)
5.
BlaisA.2006, “What affects voter turnout?”Annual Review of Political Science9111–125
6.
BlaisA, 2007, “Turnout in elections”, in Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior Eds DaltonRKlingemannH-D (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 621–635
7.
BlaisAAartsK, 2006, “Electoral systems and turnout”Acta Politica17180–196
8.
BlaisAAchenC, 2009, “Duty, preference and turnout”, paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Potsdam; copy available from author
9.
BlaisACartyK, 1990, “Does proportional representation foster voter turnout?”European Journal of Political Research18167–181
10.
BlaisADobrzynskaA, 1998, “Turnout in electoral democracies”European Journal of Political Research33239–262
11.
BlaisADobrzynskaA, 2009, “Turnout in electoral democracies revisited”, in Activating the Citizen: Dilemmas of Political Participation in Europe and Canada Eds DeBardelebenJPammettJ H (Palgrave, New York) pp 63–82
12.
BlaisAGidengilENevitteNNadeauR, 2004, “Where does turnout decline come from?”European Journal of Political Research43221–236
13.
DettreyB JSchwindt-BayerL A, 2009, “Voter turnout in presidential democracies”Comparative Political Studies421317–1338
14.
DownsA, 1957An Economic Theory of Democracy (Harper, New York)
15.
FaragoP, 1996Élections 95. Composition et Orientations Politiques de l'Électorat aux Élections Federates 1995. Swiss Electoral Studies, Bern
16.
FeigertF, 1989Canada Votes: 1935–1988 (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
17.
FismanRGattiR, 2002, “Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries”Journal of Public Economics83325–345
18.
FornosCPowerT JGarandJ C, 2004, “Explaining voter turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000”Comparative Political Studies37909–940
19.
FranklinM, 2004Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since1945 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
20.
GreenD PShapiroI, 1994Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
21.
GreerS, 2010, “Territorial politics in hard times: The welfare state under pressure in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28405–419
22.
HirczyW, 1995, “Explaining near universal turnout: The case of Malta”European Journal of Political Research27255–272
23.
HixSMarshM, 2007, “Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections”The Journal of Politics69495–510
24.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelA H, 2008, “Operationalizing regional authority: A coding scheme for 42 countries, 1950–2006”Regional and Federal Studies18123–142
25.
HopkinJ, 2003, “Political decentralization, electoral change and party organizational adaptation: A framework for analysis”European Union and Regional Studies10227–237
26.
HopkinJVan HoutenP, 2009, “Decentralization and state-wide parties: Introduction”Party Politics15131–135
27.
IimiA, 2005, “Decentralization and economic growth revisited: An empirical note”Journal of Urban Economics57449–461
28.
JackmanR, 1987, “Political institutions and voter turnout in the industrial democracies”The American Political Science Review81405–423
29.
JackmanRMillerR A, 1995, “Voter turnout in the industrial democracies during the 1980s”Comparative Political Studies27467–492
30.
JefferyCHoughD, 2009, “Understanding post-devolution elections in Scotland and Wales in comparative perspective”Party Politics15219–240
31.
Lago-PeñasILago-PeñasS, 2010, “Decentralization and electoral accountability”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28318–334
32.
LancasterT, 1999, “Complex self-identification and compounded representation in federal systems”, in Compounded Representation in West European Federations Eds BrzinskiJ BLancasterT DTuschhoffC (Frank Cass, London) pp 59–89
33.
MarksGHoogheLSchakelA H, 2008, “Measuring regional authority”Regional and Federal Studies18111–121
34.
Martínez-HerreraE, 2002, “From nation-building to building identification with political communities: Consequences of political decentralisation in Spain, the Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia”European Journal of Political Research41421–453
35.
MoragasMGaritaonandíaC, 1995Decentralization in the Global Era: Television in the Regions, Nationalities and Small Countries of the European Union (John Libbey, London)
36.
PallarésFKeatingM, 2003, “Multi-level electoral competition: Regional elections and party systems in Spain”European Urban and Regional Studies10239–255
RadcliffBDavisP, 2000, “Labour organization and electoral participation in industrial democracies”American Journal of Political Science44132–141
39.
RailingsCThrasherM, 2005, “Not all ‘second-order’ contests are the same: Turnout and party choice at the concurrent 2004 local and European Parliament elections in England”British Journal of Politics and International Relations7584–597
40.
ReifK HSchmittH, 1980, “Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results”European Journal of Political Research83–44
41.
RikerW HOrdeshookP C, 1968, “A theory of the calculus of voting”American Political Science Review6225–43
42.
SabatiniC, 2003, “Decentralization and political parties”Journal of Democracy14138–150
43.
SampedroVVan den BulckJ, 1995, “Regions vs states and cultures in the EC media policy debate: Regional broadcasting in Belgium and Spain”Media Culture and Society17239–251
44.
SchmittH, 2005, “The European Parliament elections of June 2004: Still second order?”West European Politics28650
45.
SiaroffAMererJ W A, 2002, “Parliamentary election turnout in Europe since 1990”Political Studies50916–927
46.
SimerlL M, 1982, “A survey of Canadian provincial election results, 1905–1981”, in Politics: Canada Ed. FoxP (McGraw-Hill, Toronto, ON) pp 655–693
47.
UrielEBarberanR, 2007Las Balanzas Fiscales de las Comunidades Autónomas con la Administración Pública Central 1991–2005. Fundación BBVA, Bilbao
48.
VallèsJ M, 2009, “La abstention ‘diferencial’: Una nota sobre los casos de Cataluña y de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid”Revista Española de Ciencia Política2193–105
49.
ZallerJ, 1992The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
