The New Deal for Communities (NDC) programme is one of the most intensive area-based initiatives (ABIs) launched in England. Between 1998 and 2010 thirty-nine NDC partnerships were charged with improving conditions in relation to six outcomes within deprived neighbourhoods, each accommodating around 9800 people. Data point to only modest change, much of which reflects improving attitudes towards the area and the environment. There are problems in identifying positive people-based outcomes because relatively few individuals benefit from relevant initiatives. Few positive benefits leak out of NDC areas. Transformational change was always unlikely bearing in mind the limited nature of additional resources, and because only a minority of individuals directly engage with NDC projects. This evidence supports perspectives of ABIs rooted in ‘local managerialism’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonR, 2000, “Narratives of policy: The construction of urban problems and urban policy in the official discourse of British government 1968–1998”Critical Social Policy20211–232
2.
AtkinsonRMoonG, 1994Urban Policy in Britain: The City, the State and the Market (Macmillan, London)
3.
AtkinsonRThompsonHKearnsAPettigrewM, 2006, “Giving health its ‘medical’: Assessing the place of health in area-based regeneration”Policy and Politics345–26
4.
BallMMaginnP J, 2004, “The contradictions of urban policy: The case of the Single Regeneration Budget in London”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22739–765
5.
BuckN, 2001, “Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion”Urban Studies382251–2275
6.
CarpenterJ, 2006, “Addressing Europe's urban challenges: Lessons from the EU URBAN Community Initiative”Urban Studies432145–2162
7.
CochraneA, 2007Understanding Urban Policy: A Critical Approach (Blackwell, Oxford)
8.
ColombC, 2007, “Unpacking New Labour's ‘Urban Renaissance’ agenda: Towards a socially sustainable reurbanization of British cities?”Planning Practice and Research221–24
9.
DCLG, Department of Communities and Local Government, London
10.
2007The Moving Escalator? Patterns of Residential Mobility in NDC Areas
11.
2008aNeighbourhood Management Pathfinders: Final Evaluation Report
12.
2008bChallenges, Interventions and Change: An Overview of Neighbourhood Renewal in Six New Deal for Communities Areas
13.
2009aAn Overview of Cross-sectional Change Data; 2002–2008: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme
14.
2009bResidential Mobility and Outcome Change in Deprived Areas: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme
15.
2009cUnderstanding and Tackling Worklessness Volume 2: Neighbourhood Level Problems, Interventions and Outcomes: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme
16.
2009dUnderstanding and Tackling Worklessness Volume 1: Worklessness, Employment and Enterprise: Patterns and Change: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme
17.
2009eFour Years of Change? Understanding the Experiences of the 2002–2006 New Deal for Communities Panel
18.
2010aThe New Deal for Communities Experience: A Final Assessment. The New Deal for Communities National Evaluation: Final Reportvolume 7
19.
2010bExploring and Explaining Change in Regeneration Schemes: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme. The New Deal for Communities National Evaluation: Final Reportvolume 5
20.
2010cAssessing Neighbourhood Level Regeneration and Expenditure: Findings from the Bradford New Deal for Communities Area
21.
Department of the Environment, 1994Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy (HMSO, London)
22.
DETR, Department of Environment, Transport and the Regons, London
23.
1998New Deal for Communities. Phase 1 Proposals: Guidance for Pathfinder Applicants
24.
2000aOur Towns and Cities: The Future — Delivering an Urban Renaissance
25.
2000bFinal Evaluation of City Challenge
26.
2001New Deal for Communities Financial Guidance
27.
FodenMGrimsleyMLawlessPWilsonI, 2010, “Linking interventions to outcomes in area regeneration: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England”Town Planning Review81151–171
28.
GripaiosP, 2002, “The failure of regeneration policy in Britain”Regional Studies36568–577
29.
HillD M, 2000Urban Policy and Politics (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
30.
TreasuryH M, 2003The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central GovernmentHM Treasury, London
31.
House of Commons, 2000Proposed Urban White Paper, Volume 1: Report and Proceedings of the Committee, Session 1999–2000 (The Stationery Office, London)
32.
KintreaK, 2007, “Policies and programmes for disadvantaged neighbourhoods: Recent English experience”Housing Studies22261–282
33.
LawlessP, 2006, “Area-based urban interventions: Rationale and outcomes: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England”Urban Studies431991–2011
34.
MurrayC, 1996, “Charles Murray and the underclass: The developing debate”, Choice in Welfare 33, The Institute of Economic Affairs Health and Welfare Unit, London
35.
NAO, 2004An Early Progress Report on the New Deal for Communities ProgrammeNational Audit Office, London
36.
NRU and ODPM, 2005The New Deal for Communities 2001–2005: An Interim Evaluation: Research Report 17Neighbourhood Renewal Unit/Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
37.
OakleyDTsaoH S, 2006, “A new way of revitalizing distressed urban communities? Assessing the impact of the federal Empowerment Zone program”Journal of Urban Affairs28443–471
38.
RhodesJTylerPBrennanA, 2005, “Assessing the effects of area based initiatives on local area outcomes: Some thoughts based on the national evaluation of the Single Regeneration Budget in England”Urban Studies421919–1946
39.
RobsonBLymperopoulouKRaeA, 2008, “People on the move: Exploring the functional roles of deprived neighbourhoods”Environment and Planning A402693–2714
40.
SEU, 1998Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood RenewalSocial Exclusion Unit, London
41.
ShawKRobinsonE, 2010, “UK urban regeneration policies in the early twenty-first century: Continuity or change?”Town Planning Review81123–149
42.
TunstallRCoulterA, 2006Twenty-five Years on Twenty Estates: Turning the Tide? (Policy Press, Bristol)
43.
Urban Task Force, 1999Towards an Urban Renaissance: Final Report of the Urban Task Force (Spon, London)
