The distributional effects of investment for the reduction of flood risk are explored, with the UK as an example. Using three case studies, we initially investigate the ‘gainers’ and the ‘losers’ from three contrasting engineering-oriented flood alleviation and land drainage schemes, the results of which appear to show that property owners at risk of flooding were the gainers and the general flood-free taxpayer was the loser. An analysis of flood damages, however, shows that those losing work from repairing or replacing flood damaged goods are a primary loser group as risk is reduced. Investigating insurance cover for flooding (near-universal in the UK) also shows that the principal real gainers appear to be insurance companies and their shareholders, since premiums generally do not appear to fall as risk is reduced. The implication of these novel results are evaluated both for the UK and, briefly, for elsewhere in the world.
CarrollBMorbeyHBaloghRAraozG, no date, “Living in fear: Health and social impacts of the floods in Carlisle 2005”, Centre for Health Research and Practice Development, St Martin's College, Carlisle
11.
ChattertonJ BViavatteneCMorrisJPenning-RowsellE CTapsellS, 2010, “The costs of the summer 2007 floods in England”, project SC070039/R1, Environment Agency, Bristol
12.
ChattertonJ BPenning-RowsellE CPriestS, 2012, “The many uncertainties in flood loss assessments”, inApplied Uncertainty Analysis for Flood Risk Management Eds HallJBevenK, (World Scientific Publishing, London) in press
13.
ClarkM J, 1998, “Flood insurance as a management strategy for UK coastal resilience”The Geographical Journal163333–343
14.
CLG, 2008A Guide to the Local Government Finance SettlementCommunities and Local Government, London
15.
CutterS L, 1996, “Vulnerability to environmental hazards”Progress in Human Geography20529–539
16.
Defra, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
17.
2004a, “Flood and coastal defence project appraisal guidance, FCDPAG3: Economic appraisal, supplementary note to operating authorities”, July
18.
2004b, “Making space for water: Developing a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England: A consultation exercise”
19.
2005, “Making space for water: Taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. First government response to the Autumn 2004 making space for water consultation exercise”
20.
2006a, “Consultation on outcome measures and prioritisation approaches for flood and coastal erosion management”
21.
2006b, “Testing the Sugden approach to disaggregating benefits and costs”, R&D project FD 2018
22.
2007, “Summary of responses to consultation on outcome measures and prioritisation approaches for flood and coastal erosion risk management”
2008, “Prioritisation of the FCERM capital programme: Report by the Director of Water Management, EA board update/DP EA (08) UP11, 6 May
30.
2009, “Flooding in England”
31.
2010, “Flood and coastal erosion risk management appraisal guidance (FCERM-AG)”
32.
Environment Agency, North West, 2005, “Carlisle and Lower Eden flood risk management strategy: Strategic project appraisal”, Environment Agency, North West, Warrington
33.
EvansE PAshleyRHallJPenning-RowsellE CSayersPThorneC A, 2004, “Foresight Future Flooding: Scientific summary. Volume I: Future risks and their drivers”, Office of Science and Technology, London
GreenC H, 2003Handbook of Water Economics (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
36.
GreenC HPenning-RowsellE C, 2004, “Flood insurance and government: ‘parasitic’ and ‘symbiotic’ relations”The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice29518–539
37.
HarriesTPenning-RowsellE C, 2011, “Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk”Global Environmental Change21188–197
38.
HewittK, 1997Regions at Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
39.
HM Treasury, 2003The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government (The Stationery Office, London)
40.
HR Wallingford, 2008, “Who benefits from flood management policies?”, R&D final report FD2606, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
41.
JohnsonC LPenning-RowsellE C, 2010, “What really determines policy? An evaluation of outcome measures for prioritising flood and coastal risk management investment in England”Journal of Flood Risk Management325–32
42.
JohnsonC LTunstallSPenning-RowsellE C, 2004, “Crises as catalysts for adaptation: Human response to major floods”, research report, ESRC Award No. RES-221–25-0037, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, London
43.
JohnsonC LTunstallS MPenning-RowsellE C, 2005, “Floods as catalysts for policy change: Historical lessons from England and Wales”Water Resources Development21561–575
44.
JohnsonC LPenning-RowsellE CParkerD J, 2007, “Natural and imposed injustices: The challenges in implementing ‘fair’ flood risk management policy in England”Geographical Journal173374–390
45.
KatesR W, 1962, “Hazard and Choice Perception in Flood Plain Management”, RP78, University of Chicago Department of Geography, Chicago, IL
46.
KatesRBurtonI, (Eds), 1986Themes from the Work of Gilbert F White. volume 2 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
47.
LamondJ, 2008The Impact of Flooding on the Value of Residential Property in the UKunpublished PhD thesis, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton
48.
LamondJProverbsDHammondF, 2009, “Accessibility of flood risk insurance in the UK: Confusion competition and complacency”Journal of Risk Research12825–840
PardoeJPenning-RowsellE CTurnstoneS, 2011, “Floodplain conflicts: Regulation and negotiation”Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences112889–2902
56.
ParkerD J, (Ed.), 2000Floods (Routledge, London)
57.
Penning-RowsellE CChattertonJ B, 1977The Benefits of Flood Alleviation: A Manual of Assessment Techniques (Gower Technical Press, Aldershot, Hants)
58.
Penning-RowsellE CPardoeJ, 2012, “Who loses if flood risk is reduced?”Area44152–159
59.
Penning-RowsellE CParkerD JHardingD M, 1986Floods and Drainage: British Policies for Hazard Reduction, Agricultural Improvement and Wetland Conservation (George Allen and Unwin, London)
60.
Penning-RowsellE CJohnsonCTunstallSTapsellSMorrisJChattertonJ BGreenC H, 2005The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: A Manual of Assessment Techniques (Middlesex University Press, Middlesex)
61.
Penning-RowsellE CViavatteneCPardoeJChattertonJ BParkerD JMorrisJ, 2010The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: A Handbook of Assessment TechniquesMiddlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex
62.
PittM, 2008Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods: An Independent Review by Sir Michael PittCabinet Office, London
63.
PlattR, 1986, “Floods and man: A geographer's agenda”, inThemes from the work of Gilbert F White. volume 2 Eds KatesRBurtonI, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 28–68
64.
PriestS J, 2003Responding to Flood Risk in the UK: A Strategic Reappraisalunpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Southampton
65.
PriestS JClarkM JTrebyE J, 2005, “Flood insurance: The challenge of the uninsured”Area37295–302
66.
PursegloveJ, 1988Taming the Flood (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
67.
ScanlonJ, 1988, “Winners and losers: Some thoughts about the political economy and disaster”International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters647–63
SmithD I, 1981, “Actual and potential flood damage: A case study for urban Lismore, NSW, Australia”Applied Geography133–39
70.
SmithKTobinG A, 1979Human Adjustment to the Flood Hazard (Longman, London)
71.
SmithKWardR, 1998Floods: Physical Processes and Human Impacts (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
72.
TapsellS MPenning-RowsellE CTunstallS MWilsonT, 2002, “Vulnerability to flooding: Health and social dimensions”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London3601511–1525
73.
ThorneC REvansE PPenning-RowsellE C, (Eds), 2007Future Flooding and Coastal Erosion RisksThomas Telford Ltd, London
74.
TunstallS MJohnsonC LRowsellE C Penning, 2004, “Flood hazard management in England and Wales: From land drainage to flood risk management”, World Congress on Natural Disaster Mitigation Report, New Delhi
75.
WalkerGFairburnJSmithGMitchellG, 2003, “Environmental quality and social deprivation”, Environment Agency, Bristol
WardS, 2007, “The flooding losers and winners”Money UK MSN27 June
78.
WerrittyA, 2006, “Sustainable flood management: Oxymoron or new paradigm?”Area3816–23
79.
WhiteG, 1973, “Natural hazards research”, inGeography, Resources and Environment. Volume 1: Selected Writings of Gilbert F White Eds KatesR WBurtonI, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
80.
WinchesterP, 1992Power, Choice and Vulnerability: A Case Study in Disaster Mismanagement in South India, 1977–1988 (James and James, London)
81.
YinR K, 2009Case Study Research: Design and Methods4th edition (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
