Flyvbjerg argues that power often overrides rationality as power wielders frequently portray ‘rationalisation’ as rationality to define ‘truths’ that justify their actions. When power is great, rationality diminishes. In confrontation, rationality yields to power. In this paper I contest these arguments. Through differentiating the concept of power into ‘outcome power’ held by those with privileged access to authority and ‘social power’, the power of resistance vested in everyone, and by distinguishing the concept of rationality into ‘technical’, ‘strategic’ (rationalisation), and ‘value’ rationalities, I assert that, in confrontations, individuals with social power can counteract outcome power and develop their value rationality to reproblematise issues for transformative changes. A study of the reclamation debates in Hong Kong illustrates how social power has augmented value rationality, challenging the government's outcome power and its rationalisation for further harbour reclamation, reproblematising the harbour as a unique natural heritage feature worthy of protection by law.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtsL, 2003, “Planning and power: Towards an emancipatory planning approach”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21905–924
2.
AlexanderE R A, 2000, “Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective” Journal of Planning Education and Research19242–256
3.
ArendtH, 1958The Human Condition with Introduction by Margaret Canovan (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
4.
BardS, 2002Voices from the Past, Hong Kong 1842–1918 (Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong)
5.
BarkerP, 1998Michel Foucault: An Introduction (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
6.
BristowR, 1984Land-use Planning in Hong Kong: History, Policies and Procedures (Oxford University Press, Hong Kong)
7.
BrownH I, 1988Rationality (Routledge, London)
8.
CadmanL, 2010, “How (not) to be governed: Foucault, critique, and the political”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28539–556
9.
ChuW, 2008, “Judicial reviews allow David a chance when taking on Goliath”South China Morning Post 8 March, page A12
EndacottG B, 1973A History of Hong Kong (Oxford University Press, London)
17.
EvansD M E (Ed.), 1975Hong Kong 1862–1919 Years of Discretion, A Sequel to Hong Kong: Birth, Adolescence and Coming of Age (Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong)
18.
FlyvbjergB, 1998Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice translated by SampsonS (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
19.
FlyvbjergB, 2001Making Social Science Matter translated by SampsonS (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
20.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
21.
ForesterJ, 2001, “An instructive case-study hampered by theoretical puzzles: Critical comments on Flyvbjerg's Rationality and Power”International Planning Studies6263–270
22.
FoucaultM, 1980Introduction: History of Sexuality, volume 1 (Vintage Books, New York)
23.
FoucaultM, 1984, “Interview: The regard for truth” Art and Text1620–31
24.
FoucaultM, 1991, “Governmentality”, in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality Ed. GordonC (Harvester Wheatsheaf, London) pp 87–104
25.
FungB Y, 2001A Century of Hong Kong Real Estate Development. (Joint Publishing Co Ltd, Hong Kong) (in Chinese)
GramsciA, 1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci edited and translated by HoareQSmithG N (Lawrence and Wishart, London)
28.
HabermasJ, 1993Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics translated by CroninC (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
29.
Harbour Area Consultants, 1983Harbour Reclamation and Urban Growth Study, Final Report, Executive Summary. Lands Department, Hong Kong
30.
HealeyP, 2007Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times (Routledge, London)
31.
HKRP, 1974Hong Kong: A Case to Answer Hong Kong Research Project (Spokesman Books, Hong Kong)
32.
HoP Y, 2004Challenges for an Evolving City: 160 Years of Port and Land Development in Hong Kong translated by JohnsonC S (Commercial Press, Hong Kong)
33.
Hong Kong Planning Department, 1984Territorial Development Strategy (Hong Kong Government Printer, Hong Kong)
34.
HuxleyM, 2002, “Governmentality, gender, planning: A Foucauldian perspective”, in Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory Eds AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (Routledge, London) pp 136–153
35.
HuxleyM, 2007, “Geographies of governmentality”, in Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography Eds CramptonJ WEldenS (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 185–204
36.
KuhnT, 1970The Structure of Scientific Revolution (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
37.
LeeJ W YNgM K, 2007, “Planning for the world city,” in The First Decade: Hong Kong SAR in Introspective and Retrospective Perspectives Ed. YeungY M (Chinese University Press, Hong Kong) pp 297–319
38.
LohC, 2006Being Here: Shaping a Preferred Future (SCMP, Hong Kong)
39.
MurdochJ, 2006Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space (Sage, London)
40.
New Airport Projects Co-ordination Office, 1996, Hong Kong Airport Core Programme: Building for the Future publicity pamphlet (Government Printer, Hong Kong)
41.
NgM K, 1993, “Strategic planning in Hong Kong” Town Planning Review64287–311
42.
NgM K, 2005, “Planning cultures in two Chinese transitional cities: Hong Kong and Shenzhen”, in Comparative Planning Cultures Ed. SanyalB (Routledge, New York) pp 113–143
43.
NgM K, 2007, “Outmoded planning in the face of new politics”, in HKSAR in its First Decade Ed. ChengJ (City University Press, Hong Kong) pp 591–629
44.
NgM K, 2008, “From government to governance? Politics of planning in the first decade of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region” Planning Theory and Practice9165–185
45.
NgM K, 2010, “Place-making battlefields: Three empty reclaimed sites in Victoria Harbour” disP, The Planning Review1808–17
46.
NgM KCookA, 1997, “Reclamation: An urban development strategy under fire” Land Use Policy145–23
47.
NietzscheF, 1969On the Geneology of Morals (Vintage Books, New York)
48.
PattonP, 2000Deleuze and the Political (Routledge, London)
49.
PELB, 1995The Shape of Things to Come: An Overview of the Role of Harbour Reclamations in the Future Development of Hong Kong Planning, Environment and Lands Branch (Government Printer, Hong Kong)
Town Planning Board, 2009, “Outline Zoning Plan (OZP), S/H15/2. Explanatory notes”, Town Planning Board, Hong Kong
52.
TregearT RBerryL, 1959The Development of Hong Kong and Kowloon as told in Maps (Hong Kong University, Hong Kong)
53.
TsangS, 2004A Mdoern History of Hong Kong (Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong)
54.
WatsonV, 2003, “Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics” Planning Theory and Practice4395–407
55.
WeberM, 1978Economy and Society translated and edited by RothGWittichC (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
56.
Legislation
57.
CALL No. 116, 2007Society for Protection of the Harbour and Secretary for Justice Constitutional and Administrative Law List, Court of First Instance, Judgment handed down by J Hartmann on 20 March 2008
58.
CFI (Court of First Instance), 2003, “Society for Protection of the Harbour Ltd. v. Town Planning Board, 8 July 2003”, in 2 HKLRD pp 787–790
59.
HKCU 43, 2006, “Town Planning Board v.Society for the Protection of the Harbour Ltd.” (LexisNexis Asia)
60.
HKCU 793, 2006, “Society for Protection of the Harbour Ltd. v. Town Planning Board” (LexisNexis Asia)
61.
HKLII, 1939Town Planning Ordinance chapter 131
62.
HKLII, 1999Protection of the Harbour Ordinance chapter 531
63.
Hong Kong Sessional Paper, 1887Praya Reclamation Scheme 13 July
64.
LegCo, 1996, Official Record of Proceedings, 13 March 1996, Legislative Council, Hong Kong
65.
LegCo, 1999, Official Record of Proceedings, 3 November 1999, Legislative Council, Hong Kong
