Numerous scholars assert that welfare recipients face a mismatch between their residential locations in inner-city or rural areas and employment opportunities located in the suburbs far from where they live. However, the authors' findings bring into question the wholesale application of the spatial mismatch hypothesis to all welfare recipients. Welfare recipients in mid-sized cities such as Fresno, California, do not face spatial barriers to employment as they live in compact areas where distances between residential and employment locations are relatively short. In contrast, job access is important in the nonurbanized areas of Fresno County where welfare recipients who live in job-rich neighborhoods are more likely to be employed than are recipients who are dispersed throughout more isolated, nonurbanized areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllardS WDanzigerS, 2003, “Proximity and opportunity: How residence and race affect the employment of welfare recipients”Housing Policy Debate13675–700
2.
BachRCarroll-SeguinR, 1986, “Labor force participation, household composition and sponsorship among Southeast Asian refugees”International Migration Review20381–404
3.
BaneM JEllwoodD T, 1994Welfare Realities: From Rhetoric to Reform (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
4.
BaniaNCoultonCLeeteL, 1999, “Welfare reform and access to job opportunities in the Cleveland metropolitan area”, paper presented at the 1999 Annual Fall Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC, 6 November; copy available from the authors, The Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
5.
BlumenbergE, 2002, “On the way to work: Welfare participants and barriers to employment”Economic Development Quarterly16314–325
6.
BlumenbergEHaasP, 2002, “The transportation needs and behavior of welfare participants in Fresno County”, US FHWA Report FHWA/CA/OR-2001023, Mineta Transportation Institute, Jan Jose, CA
7.
BlumenbergEOngP, 1998, “Job accessibility and welfare usage: Evidence from Los Angeles”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management17639–657
8.
BlumenbergEOngP, 2001, “Cars, buses, and jobs: Welfare participants and employment access in Los Angeles”Journal of the Transportation Research Boardnumber 1756, 22–31
9.
BorjasG J, 2002, “Welfare reform and immigrant participation in welfare programs”International Migration Review361093–1123
10.
BradyH ESpragueM HGeyF CWisemanM, 2002, “Seasonal employment dynamics and welfare use in agricultural and rural California counties”, in Rural Dimensions of Welfare Reform Eds WeberB ADuncanG JWhitenerL A, (W E Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI) pp 147–176
11.
California Department of Social Services, 2001, “CAL Statistics”, Research and Development Division, Data Analysis and Publications Branch, Sacramento, CA
12.
California Department of Social Services, 2002, “CA 237 CW—CalWORKs cash grant caseload movement report”, Research and Development Division
13.
California State Department of Finance, 2002, “Official state estimates, E-1 city/county population estimates with annual percent change, January 1, 2000 and 2001”, Demographic Research Unit, Sacramento, http://www.dof.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/e-1text.htm
CerveroRSandovalOLandisJ, 2002, “The value of transportation in stimulating welfare-to-work transitions: Evidence from San Francisco”Journal of Planning, Education and Research2250–63
16.
Citizens Planning and Housing Association, 1999, “Access to jobs in the Baltimore region”, Citizens Planning and Housing Association, 218 W Saratoga Street, 5th floor, Baltimore, MD 21298-2923, http://www.cphabaltimore.org/.
17.
ClintonW, 2000, “President Clinton takes actions to help low-income families get on the road to work and opportunity” 23 February, Office of the Secretary, The White House, Washington, DC
18.
CookeT J, 1997, “Geographic access to job opportunities and labor force participation among women and African Americans in the greater Boston metropolitan area”Urban Geography18213–227
19.
DanielsP WWarnesA M, 1980Movement in Cities: Spatial Perspectives on Urban Transport and Travel (Metheun, London)
20.
DanzigerSCorcoranMDanzigerSHeflinCKalilALevineJRosenDSeefeldtKSiefertKTolmanR, 2000, “Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients”, in Prosperity for All? The Economic Boom and African Americans Eds CherryRRodgersW MIII, (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), http://www.fordschool.umich.edu/poverty/research.htm
21.
DeaversKHoppeRRossP, 1986, “Public policy and rural poverty; a view from the 1980s”Policy Studies Journal15291–309
22.
DeParleJ, 1997, “What about Mississippi? A special report; Welfare law weighs heavily on Delta, where jobs are few. (Effect of welfare reform on residents of the Mississippi Delta)”New York Times 16 October, page A1
23.
DuncanC MSweetS, 1992, “Introduction: Poverty in rural America”, in Rural Poverty in America Ed. DuncanC M, (Auburn House, Boston, MA)
24.
EllwoodD T, 1986, “The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Are there teenage jobs missing in the ghetto?”, in The Black Youth Employment Crisis Eds FreemanR BHolzerH, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 147–187
25.
FletcherC NFloraJ LGaddisB JWinterMLittJ S, 2002, “Small towns and welfare reform”, in Rural Dimensions of Welfare Reform Eds WeberB ADuncanG JWhitenerL A, (W E Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI) pp 201–229
26.
FoxW F, 1980, “Size economies in local government services: A review”, US Department of Agriculture Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service, Washington, DC
27.
HarknettK, 2001, “Working and leaving welfare: Does race or ethnicity matter?”Social Service Review75359–385
28.
HirschW Z, 1968, “The supply of urban public services”, in Issues in Urban Economics Eds PerloffH SWingoLJr, (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 477–525
29.
HolzerH J, 1991, “The spatial mismatch hypothesis: What has the evidence shown?”Urban Studies28105–122
30.
HoynesH W, 2000, “Local labor markets and welfare spells: Do demand conditions matter?”Review of Economics and Statistics82351–368
31.
IhlanfeldtK R, 1992Job Accessibility and the Employment and the School Enrollment of Teenagers (W E Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI)
32.
IhlanfeldtK RSjoquistD L, 1998, “The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform”Housing Policy Debate9849–892
33.
JencksCMayerS E, 1990, “Residential segregation, job proximity, and black job opportunities”, in Inner-city Poverty in the United States Eds LynnL EJrMcGrearyM G H, (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) pp 187–222
34.
KainJ F, 1968, “Residential segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization”Quarterly Journal of Economics82175–197
35.
KainJ F, 1992, “The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Three decades later”Housing Policy Debate3371–460
36.
KawabataM, 2003, “Job access and employment among low-skilled autoless workers in US metropolitan areas”Environment and Planning A351651–1668
37.
LacombeA, 1998, “Welfare reform and access to jobs in Boston”, US Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, DC
38.
LaubeMLyonsWvan der WildenP, 1997, “Transportation planning for ACCESS TO JOBS: Job access and the metropolitan transportation planning process in Hartford, St Louis and Detroit”, report prepared for the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Office of Planning, Federal Highway Administration Office of Environment and Planning
39.
LermanR IDukeAValenteJ, 1999, “Do income support levels and work incentives differ between rural and urban areas?”, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410050
40.
LevinsonH S, 1992, “System and service planning”, in Public Transportation2nd edition, Eds GrayG EHoelL A, (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) pp 369–406
41.
LichterD TJohnsonG MMcLaughlinD K, 1994, “Changing linkages between work and poverty in rural America”Rural Sociology59395–415
42.
McKernanSLermanR IPindusNValenteJ, 2000, “The relationship between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan locations, changing welfare policies, and the employment of single mothers”, JCPR WP 192, http://www.jcpr.org/conferences/ruralbriefing.html
43.
MartinP LTaylorJ E, 2000, “Farm employment, immigration, and poverty: A vicious cycle?”, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, http://www.reap.ucdavis.edu/working_papers/farm.pdf
44.
MeyerM DMillerE J, 2000Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-oriented Approach (McGraw-Hill, New York)
MossPTillyC, 1991Why Black Men are Doing Worse in the Labor Market: A Review of Supply-side and Demand-side Explanations (Social Science Research Council, New York)
OliverJ E, 2000, “City size and civic involvement in metropolitan America”American Political Science Review94, 361–373
49.
OlsonKPavettiL, 1996Personal and Family Challenges to the Successful Transition From Welfare to Work: How Prevalent are these Potential Barriers to Employment? (Urban Institute, Washington DC)
50.
OngP, 1996, “Work and car ownership among welfare recipients”Social Work Research2255–262
51.
OngP M, 2002, “Car access and welfare-to-work”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management21239–252
52.
OngPBlumenbergE, 1994, “Welfare and work among Southeast Asians”, in The State of Asian Pacific America: Economic Diversity Issues and Policies. A Public Policy Report Ed. OngP, LEAP Asian Pacific American Public Policy Institute and UCLA Asian American Studies Center, Los Angeles, pp 113–137
53.
OngPBlumenbergE, 1998, “Job access, commute and travel burden among welfare recipients”Urban Studies3577–93
54.
PorterfieldS L, 1998, “On the precipice of reform: Welfare spell durations for rural, female-headed families”American Journal of Agricultural Economics80994–999
55.
PrestonVMcLaffertyS, 1999, “Spatial mismatch research in the 1990s: Progress and potential”Papers in Regional Science78387–402
56.
RankM RHirschlT A, 1988, “A rural–urban comparison of welfare exits: The importance of population density”Rural Sociology53190–206
57.
RichM, 1999, “Access to opportunities: The welfare-to-work challenge in metropolitan Atlanta”, paper presented at the 1999 Annual Fall Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC, 6 November; copy available from the authors, Department of Political Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
58.
RuckerG, 1994Status Report on Public Transportation in Rural America, 1994 P99-3, Rural Transit Assistance Program, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC
59.
Rural Policy Research Institute, 1999Rural America and Welfare Reform: An Overview AssessmentRural Welfare Reform Panel, University of Missouri, Colombia, MO, 10 February, http://www.rupri.org/.
60.
SawickiD SMoodyM, 2000, “Developing transportation alternatives for welfare recipients moving to work”Journal of the American Planning Association66306–318
61.
SheppardE, 1995, “Modeling and predicting aggregate flows”, in The Geography of Urban Transportation Ed. HansonS, 2nd edition (Guilford Press, New York) pp 91–118
62.
StanselD, 2002, “Interjurisdictional competition and local economic performance: A cross-sectional examination of US metropolitan areas”, working paper, Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
63.
TaylorB DOngP M, 1995, “Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence and commuting in US metropolitan areas”Urban Studies321453–1473
64.
TickamyerA R, 1992, “The working poor in rural labor markets: The example of the southeastern United States”, in Rural Poverty in America Ed. DuncanC M, (Auburn House, Boston, MA) pp 41–62
US Census Bureau, 2000, “Metropolitan area population estimates for July 1, 1999 and population change for April 1, 1990 to July 1, 1999 (includes April 1, 1990 Population Estimates Base)”, Population Estimates Program, Population Division, US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
WeberBDuncanG, 2000, “Welfare reform reauthorization and rural America: Implications of recent research”, Joint Center for Poverty Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL and University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
69.
WeberB ADuncanG JWhitenerL A, (Eds), 2002Rural Dimensions of Welfare Reform (W E Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI)
70.
WeinbergB A, 2000, “Black residential centralization and the spatial mismatch hypothesis”Journal of Urban Economics48110–134
71.
ZedlewskiS RAldersonD, 2001, “Do families on welfare in the post-TANF era differ from their pre-TANF counterparts?”, discussion papers, Assessing the New Federalism, 1–3 February, Urban Institute, Washington, DC
72.
ZihakJ PFighoD NDavisE EConnollyL S, 2000, “Accounting for the decline in AFDC caseloads; welfare reform or the economy?”Journal of Human Resources35570–586
