Urban land development in India is changing under the auspices of economic liberalisation. Kolkata has been in the forefront of this transformation through development of new townships in the urban peripheries based on a distinctive state-led land development model. Within this context New Town, Kolkata (also known as Rajarhat) provides a highly illuminative case to articulate the ways in which the state is implementing its neoliberal agenda in land development. It rides on political and ideological high ground by seeking to create a ‘model development’ of state—market partnership for dual goals of fostering capitalist interest while fulfilling welfarist principles. Interesting insights have emerged that point to a policy paradox. On one hand, the process follows market principles of efficacy and efficiency; on the other hand, state's keenness to extend control persists, thereby creating a highly uneven terrain for state—market interaction. New Town reflects a typical quasi-market condition shaped by the monopolistic state, the poorly structured role of the private sector, an absence of civic bodies, and minimal land and housing provision for the poor. In India, as internationally, the economic liberalisation market ideology is increasingly construed as good governance. In this context New Town is a step in the right direction, but the progress is patchy, uneven, and still evolving.
AlmsJAnnezP KModiA, 2004, “Stamp duties in Indian States: A case for reform”, WP 3413, World Bank Policy Research, World Bank, Washington, DC
2.
BanerjeeB, 2002, “Security of tenure”, in Holding their Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the Urban Poor in India, Brazil and South Africa Eds Durand-LasserveARoystonL (Earthscan, London) pp 37–58
3.
BertaudA, 2010, “Land markets, government interventions, and housing affordability”, WP 18, Wolfensohn Center for Development, Washington, DC
4.
BertaudARenaudB, 1995, “Cities without land markets: Location and land use in the socialist city”, WP 1477, World Bank Policy Research, World Bank, Washington, DC
5.
BhaduriA, 2007, “Development or developmental terrorism?”Economic and Political Weekly 17 February, pages 552–553
6.
BidwaiP, 2006, “The great land grab”Frontline23(18) 9–22
7.
BiswasP K, 2006, “New Town Kolkata at a glance”, West Bengal Department of Information and Cultural Affairs, Kolkata, 19–23 January
8.
BrennerNTheodoreN, 2002, “Cities and the geographies of actually existing neoliberalism”, in Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe Eds. BrennerNTheodoreN (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 3–32
9.
CarterM RMesbahD, 1993, “State-mandated and market-mediated land reform in Latin America”, in Including the Poor Eds LiptonMVan der GaagJ (World Bank, Washington, DC) pp 278–305
10.
CMPO, 1966Basic Development Plan for the Calcutta Metropolitan District, 1966–1986Calcutta Metropolitan Planning Organisation, Calcutta
DeiningerK, 1998, “Making negotiated land reform work: Initial experience from Columbia, Brazil and South Africa”World Development2651–672
14.
DeiningerK, 2003aLand Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction World Bank Research Report (World Bank, Washington, DC and Oxford University Press, New York)
15.
DeiningerK, 2003b, “Land markets in developing and transition economies: Impact of liberalization and implications for future reform”American Journal of Agricultural Economics851217–1222
16.
Deloitte, 2009, “Global economic slowdown and its impact on the Indian IT industry”, Deloitte, Delhi
17.
De SotoH, 2000The Mystery of Capital (Basic Books, New York)
GladstoneD LKolapalliK S, 2007, “The urban development effects of large scale public sector landowners in India: A comparative study of Delhi and Bangalore”, working paper, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
22.
GOI, Government of India, New Delhi
23.
GOI, Government of India1985Land Acqusition Act 1894 (As modified September 1985)
24.
GOI, Government of India1992The Constitution of India (Seventy-third and Seventy-fourth Amendment)
25.
GOI, Government of India1997Ninth Five-year Plan 2002–2007Planning Commission
26.
GOI, Government of India2002Tenth Five-year Plan 2002–2007Planning Commission
27.
GOI, Government of India2007Land Acqusition (Amendment) Bill
28.
GuhaA, 2007, “Peasant resistance in West Bengal a decade before Singur and Nandigram”Economic and Political Weekly42(37) 3706–3711
29.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Blackwell, Malden, MA)
30.
HarveyD, 2005A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
KDMA, Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority, Kolkata
33.
KDMA, Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority1993Concept Plan for New Town
34.
KDMA, Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority2000Vision 2025: Perspective Plan of KMA—2025
35.
KDMA, Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority2005Vision 2025, Perspective Plan of KMA—2025. Draft Final Report
36.
KPMG, 2010, “Affordable housing: A key growth driver in the real estate sector?”, KPMG, India
37.
KunduA, 2003“Politics and economics of land policies: Delhi Master Plan 2021”Economic and Political Weekly38(34) 3530–3532
38.
KunduN, 2004, “The case of Kolkata”, draft prepared for The Challenge of Slums, UN-Habitat, Nairobi
39.
LakeRNewmanK, 2002, “Differential citizenship in the shadow state”GeoJournal58109–120
40.
LeeK-W, 2010, “Regulating design in Singapore: A survey of the Government Land Sales (GLS) programme”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28145–164
41.
LiL H, 1997, “The political economy of the privatisation of the land market in Shanghai”Urban Studies34321–335
42.
McCartenW J, 2003, “The challenge of fiscal discipline in the Indian states”, in Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints Eds RoddenJ AEskelandG S (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 249–286
43.
MallickR, 2008Development Policy of a Communist Government: West Bengal Since 1977 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
44.
MenezesL M, 1988, “Urban land policy trends in Asia: An overview”Land Use Policy5291–300
45.
MitraS, 1992, Power, Protest, and Participation: Local Elites and the Politics of Development in India (Routledge, London)
46.
MitraS, 2002, “Planned urbanization through public participation: Case of the New Town, Kolkata”Economic and Political Weekly37(11) 1048–1054
47.
MoyoSYerosP, 2005, “Land occupations and land reform in Zimbabwe: Towards the national democratic revolution”, in Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America Eds MoyoSYerosP (Zed Books, London) pp 165–208
48.
MurpheyR, 1964, “The city in the swamp: Aspects of the site and early growth of Calcutta”The Geographical Journal130241–256
49.
NKRealtors, 2011End of the Year Market Review Kolkata
50.
OECD, 1992Urban Land Markets: Policies for the 1990s (OECD, Paris)
51.
PayneG, 1989Informal Housing and Land Subdivisions in Third World Cities: A Review of the LiteratureCentre for Development and Emergency Practice, Oxford
52.
PrahaladC K, 2010Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ)
53.
RajackR, 2007, “Does the ownership and management of public land matter to land market outcomes”, in Urban Land Markets: Improving Land Management for Successful Urbanization Eds LallS VFreireMYuenBRajackRHelluinJ J (Springer, New York) pp 305–337
RoyA, 2009, “Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization”Planning Theory876–87
56.
SahuS RMenonS, 2011, “Recessionary challenges in real estate business”Asian Pacific Journal of Research in Business2206–215
57.
SeidlITisdellC AHarrisonS, 2002, “Environmental regulation of land use and public compensation: Principles, and Swiss and Australian examples”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20699–716
58.
SenDKumerD, 2003, “On the determination of reserved price of bulk residential plots in New Towns and application of model to New Town, Kolkata”, theme paper, ‘Seminar on accelerating housing and construction industry in West Bengal’, 25 August, Kolkata, FICCI West Bengal State Council, Kolkata
59.
SenguptaU, 2006a, “Government intervention in public private partnership in housing in Kolkata”Habitat International30448–461
60.
SenguptaU, 2006b, “Liberalisation and privatisation of public rental housing in Kolkata, India”Cities23269–278
61.
SenguptaUTippleA G, 2007, “The performance of public-sector housing in Kolkata, India, in the post-reform milieu”Urban Studies442009–2027
62.
ShawA, 2004The Making of Navi Mumbai (Orient Longman, New Delhi)
63.
SikorTMüllerD, 2009, “The limits of state-led land reform: An introduction”World Development371307–1316
64.
SolomonB, 2004, “Urban land transformation for pro-poor economies”Geo Forum35177–187
65.
SwyngedouwE, 2000, “Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1863–76
