An attempt is made, first, to assess the technopolis project of Sophia-Antipolis, and, second, to propose a qualitative means of understanding local systems of innovation. A quantitative analysis based on the evaluation of the Sophia-Antipolis development indicates success, but seems to be insufficient to give an indication of the economic strength of the project. A theoretical analysis of local systems of production and innovation appears to be necessary; such an analysis is carried out, and ends with the definition of a concept of innovative network that is based on the coordination modes of local activities and the related incentive schemes. This framework is then applied to Sophia-Antipolis, and allows a qualitative assessment of the project, revealing some weaknesses in the local context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmendolaMGaffardJ L, 1988The Innovative Choice: An Economic Analysis of the Dynamics of Technology (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
2.
AntonelliC, 1986L'attività Innovativa nel Distretto Tecnologico (Fondazione G Agnelli, Turin)
3.
AokiM, 1988Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
4.
ArthurW B, 1988, “Urban systems and historical path dependence”, in Cities and Their Vital Systems Eds AusubelJ HHermanR, (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) pp 85–97
5.
AydalotP, (Ed.), 1986Milieux Innovateurs en Europe (GREMI, Paris)
6.
AydalotPKeebleD, (Eds), 1988High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments: The European Experience (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants)
7.
CharbitCGaffardJ LLonghiCPerrinJ CQuéréMRavixJ L, 1991, “Coherence and diversity of systems of innovation: The study of local systems of innovation in Europe”, report for the MUST project, FAST Program, Commission for the European Communities, Transformations de l'Appareil Productif et Stratégies Économiques Sectorielles; copy available from authors
8.
CurrieV, 1985Science Parks in Britain—Their Role for the Late 1980's (CSP Economic Publications, Cotswold, Cardiff)
9.
DosiG, 1988, “Sources, procedures and microeconomics effects of innovation”Journal of Economic Literature261120–1171
10.
DosiGFreemanCNelsonRSilverbergGSoeteL, (Eds), 1988Technical Change and Economic Theory (Frances Pinter, London)
11.
DosiGTeeceDWinterS, 1990, “Les frontières des entreprises: Vers une théorie de la cohérence de la grande entreprise”Revue d'Economie Industrielle51238–254
GaffardJ L, 1990aEconomie Industrielle et de l'Innovation (Dalloz, Paris)
14.
GaffardJ L, 1990b, “Innovations et changements structurels”Revue d'Economie Politique100325–382
15.
GordonR, 1990, “Systemes de production, réseaux industriels et régions: Les transformations dans l'organisation sociale et spatiale de l'innovation”Revue d'Economie Industrielle51304–339
16.
HicksJ R, 1973Capital and Time (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
17.
ImaiK, 1989, “Japanese pattern of innovation and its commercialization process”, DP-136, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo
18.
ImaiKBabaY, 1989, “Systemic innovation and cross-border networks: Transcending markets and hierarchies to create a new techno-economic system”, paper presented at the International Seminar on Science, Technology and Economic Growth (OECD, Paris)
19.
ImaiKItamiH, 1984, “Interpenetration of organization and market”International Journal of Industrial Organisation2285–310
20.
KlineSRosenbergN, 1986, “An overview of innovation”, in The Positive Sum Strategy Ed. LandauRRosenbergN, (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) pp 275–305
21.
LundvallB A, 1988, “Innovation as an interactive process: From user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation”, in Technical Change and Economic Theory Eds DosiGFreemanCNelsonRSilverbergGSoeteL, (Frances Pinter, London) pp 349–369
22.
MansellR, 1990, “Rethinking the telecommunication infrastructure: The new ‘black box’”Research Policy19501–515
23.
NelsonRWinterS, 1982An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA)
24.
PavittK, 1991, “Key characteristics of the large innovating firm”British Journal of Management241–50
25.
PerrinJ C, 1991, “Réseaux d'innovation—milieux innovateurs, développement territorial”Revue d'Economie Regionale et Urbaine3/4343–374
26.
PioreM JSabelC F, 1984The Second Industrial Divide (Basic Books, New York)
27.
QuéréM, 1987, “Evaluation empirique de Sophia-Antipolis: Stratégies d'entreprises et milieu technopole”, Programme de recherches Technopoles et Développement, Tome 2, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Transformations de l'Appareil Productif et Stratégies Économiques Sectorielles, Sophia-Antipolis; copy available from authors
28.
RavixJ LTorreA, 1990, “Eléments pour une analyse industrìelle des interactions spatiales: Réseaux locaux et poles technologiques”, Colloqium on Mondialisation de l'économie et développement du territorie, Saint-Etienne, September; copy available from the authors, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Transformations de l'Appareil Productif et Stratégies Économiques Sectorielles, Sophia-Antipolis
29.
RosenbergN, 1976Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
30.
SaxenianA L, 1988, “The Cheshire Cat's Grin: Innovation and regional development in England”, in Technology Review167–75
31.
ScottA J, 1991, “The role of large producers in industrial districts: A case study of high-technology systems houses in Southern California”, UCLA Research Papers in Economic and Urban Geography 2, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
32.
ScottA JStorperM, 1990, “Regional development reconsidered”, WP-1, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
