Some argue that, as place-bound, development-oriented entities dependent upon capital, community development corporations (CDCs) are ineffective political agents beyond the boundaries of the disadvantaged neighborhoods they serve. In response I ask: how have CDCs worked through policy networks to rescale the ‘spaces of engagement’ for community development policy beyond the local? Data gathered through document analysis, a survey, and interviews point to three distinct phases of the CDC rescaling project: (1) linking the local through a national network; (2) expanding spaces of engagement through state policy networks; and (3) a national network of networks. CDC policy networks have had uneven success in establishing their legitimacy, proving CDC effectiveness as agents of local economic development, overcoming ‘militant particularisms’, and mobilizing both the state and capital. CDCs can expand their spaces of engagement beyond the local through policy networks if they successfully develop boundary-spanning relations, defend their place-based agenda, combat essentialization through performance measurement, strengthen their state networks, and reimagine their national rescaling project.
AnglinR V, (Ed.), 2004Building the Organizations That Build Communities: Strengthening the Capacity of Faith- and Community-based Development OrganizationsUS Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, DC.
2.
BarbeNSekeraJ, 1983States and Communities: The Challenge for Economic ActionNational Congress for Community Economic Development, Washington, DC.
3.
BlancoILowndesVPratchettL, 2011, “Policy networks and governance networks: Towards greater conceptual clarity”Political Studies Review9297–308.
4.
BörzelT A, 1998, “Organizing Babylon: On the different conceptions of policy networks”Public Administration76253–273.
5.
BrattR G, 1989Rebuilding a Low-income Housing Policy (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA).
6.
BrattR G, 1997, “CDCs: Contributions outweigh contradictions, a reply to Randy Stoecker”Journal of Urban Affairs1923–28.
7.
BrattR G, 2006, “Community development corporations: Challenges in supporting a right to housing”, in A Right to Housing: Foundation for a New Social Agenda Eds BrattR GStoneM EHartmanC, (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 340–359.
8.
BrattR G, 2007Should We Foster the Nonprofit Housing Sector as Developers and Owners of Subsidized Rental Housing?Joint Center of Housing Studies, Cambridge, MA.
9.
BrattR G, 2008, “Nonprofit and for-profit developers of subsidized rental housing: Comparative attributes and collaborative opportunities”Housing Policy Debate19323–365.
10.
BrennerN, 2004New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood (Oxford Press, New York).
11.
CastellsM, 2000The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Malden, MA).
12.
CastreeN, 2004, “Differential geographies: Place, indigenous rights and ‘local’ resources”Political Geography23133–167.
13.
ComstockD E, 1992Linking Local Successes: The Achievements of State Community Economic Development Associations in the 1980sNational Congress for Community Economic Development, Washington, DC.
14.
CoxK, 1998, “Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics”Political Geography171–23.
15.
DeFilippisJ, 2004Unmaking Goliath: Community Control in the Face of Global Capital (Routledge, New York).
EricksonD J, 2009The Housing Policy Revolution: Networks and NeighborhoodsUrban Institute, Washington, DC.
18.
FisherR, 1994Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in America (Twayne, New York).
19.
FisherR, (Ed.), 2009The People Shall Rule: ACORN, Community Organizing, and the Struggle for Economic Justice (Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN).
20.
Florida Alliance of CDCs, 2009An Overview of Community Development Corporation Certification Proposed By the Florida Alliance of Community Development CorporationsJacksonville, FL.
21.
Florida Legislature Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, 1998Review of the Community Development Corporation Support and Assistance ProgramTallahassee, FL.
22.
FraserJ CLepofskyJKickE LWilliamsJ P, 2003, “The construction of the local and the limits of contemporary community-building in the United States”Urban Affairs Review38417–445.
23.
GlickmanN JServonL J, 1998, “More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity”Housing Policy Debate9497–539.
24.
GlickmanN JServonL J, 2003, “By the numbers: Measuring community development corporations' capacity”Journal of Planning Education and Research22240–256.
25.
GroganP SProscioT, 2000Comeback Cities: A Blueprint for Urban Neighborhood Revival (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
26.
HaiderD, 1986, “Economic development: Changing practices in a changing US economy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy4451–469.
27.
HalpernR, 1995Rebuilding the Inner City: A History of Neighborhood Initiatives to Address Poverty in the United States (Columbia University Press, New York).
28.
HammerJAllenJMeierB, 2010Accounting for Development: Assessing Social and Triple Bottom Line Returns of Public Development InvestmentsLincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
29.
HarveyD, 2003, “City and justice: Social movements in the city”, in The Human Sustainable City: Challenges and Perspectives from the Habitat Agenda Eds GirardL FForteBCerretaMDe ToroPForteF, (Ashgate, Burlington, VT) pp 235–254.
30.
HealeyP, 2003, “The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation”, in Readings in Planning Theory2nd edition, Eds CampbellSFainsteinS, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 234–257.
31.
HoogheLMarksG, 2003, “Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance”American Political Science Review97233–243.
ImmergluckD, 2005, “Building power, losing power: The rise and fall of a prominent community economic development coalition”Economic Development Quarterly19211–224.
34.
InnesJ EBooherD E, 2003, “Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue”, in Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society Eds HajerM AWagenaarH, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 33–59.
35.
JessopB, 1998, “The rise of governance and the risk of failure: The case of economic development”International Social Science Journal5029–45.
36.
JessopB, 2002The Future of the Capitalist State (Blackwell, Oxford).
37.
JuddD R, 1998, “The case of the missing scales: A commentary on Cox”Political Geography1729–34.
KirkpatrickL O, 2007, “The two ‘logics’ of community development: Neighborhoods, markets, and community development corporations”Politics and Society35329–359.
LawlessP, 2001, “Community economic development in urban and regional regeneration: Unfolding potential or justifiable scepticism?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19135–155.
42.
LeitnerHMillerB, 2007, “Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: A commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2116–125.
43.
LeitnerHPavlikCSheppardE, 2002, “Networks, governance, and the politics of scale: Inter-urban networks and the European Union”, in Geographies of Power: Placing Scale Eds HerodAWrightM W, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 274–303.
44.
LipskyMSmithS R, 1990, “Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state”Political Science Quarterly104625–648.
45.
MallachA, 2008Managing Neighborhood Change: A Framework for Sustainable and Equitable RevitalizationNational Housing Institute, Montclair, NJ.
46.
Massachusetts Association of CDCs, 2008MACDC GOALs Initiative: A Detailed Report of the Accomplishments of Community Development Corporations in MassachusettsBoston, MA.
47.
MarstonS AJonesJ PIIIWoodwardK, 2005, “Human geography without scale”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30416–432.
48.
MartinD G, 1999, “Transcending the fixity of jurisdictional scale”Political Geography1833–38.
49.
MorrillR, 1999, “Inequalities of power, costs and benefits across geographic scales: The future uses of the Hanford reservation”Political Geography181–23.
50.
NACEDA, 2010aRising Above: Community Economic Development in a Changing LandscapeNational Alliance of Community Development Associations, Washington, DC.
51.
NACEDA, 2010bNACEDA Fact SheetNational Alliance of Community Development Associations, Washington, DC.
52.
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, 1969Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil DisordersWashington, DC.
53.
NCCED, National Congress for Community Economic Development, Washington, DC.
54.
1988Final Report to the Technical Assistance Project of the US Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration on the Establishment of Statewide Community Economic Development.
55.
1989Against All Odds: The Achievements of Community-based Development Organizations.
56.
1997State Associations: Models for CDCs.
57.
1999The Evolution of Devolution: State CED Associations Well Positioned to Influence State Policy, Final Report to the Ford Foundation on Direct Support to State CED Associations.
58.
2005Reaching New Heights: Trends and Achievements of Community-based Development Organizations.
NeighborWorks America, 2005Managing Neighborhood Change: Best Practices for Communities Undergoing GentrificationWashington, DC.
62.
New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, 2009New York State Neighborhood and Rural Preservation Program: 2009 Annual ReportAlbany, NY.
63.
NichollsW, 2009, “Place, networks, space: Theorizing the geographies of social movements”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3478–93.
64.
O'ConnorA, 1999, “Swimming against the tide: A brief history of federal policy in poor communities”, in Urban Problems and Community Development Eds FergusonR FDickensW T, (Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC) pp 77–138.
65.
OstermanP, 2003Gathering Power: The Future of Progressive Politics in America (Beacon Press, Boston, MA).
66.
PierceN RSteinbachC F, 1987Corrective Capitalism: The Rise of America's Community Development Corporations (Ford Foundation, New York).
PrytherchD L, 2007, “Urban geography with scale: Rethinking scale via Wal-Mart's ‘geography of big things”’Urban Geography28456–482.
69.
RacoMTurokIKintreaK, 2003, “Local development companies and the regeneration of Britain's cities”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21277–303.
70.
RhodesR A W, 2007, “Understanding governance: Ten years on”Organization Studies281243–1264.
71.
RhodesR A WMarshD, 2002, “Policy communities and issue networks: Beyond typology”, in Social Networks: Critical Concepts in Sociology Eds ScottJ, (Routledge, London) pp 89–119.
72.
RobertsB FZdenekR OBivensW E, 1980Community Development Corporations and State Development Policy: Potential for PartnershipNational Congress for Community Economic Development, Washington, DC.
73.
RuskD, 1999Inside Game, Outside Game: Winning Strategies for Saving Urban America (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).
ScallyC P, 2010Measuring Up: Evaluating Affordable Rental Housing at Project, Household, and Community Scales—Recommendations for New York StateUniversity at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY.
76.
ScallyC PKoenigR, 2012, “Beyond NIMBY and poverty deconcentration: Reframing the outcomes of affordable rental housing development”Housing Policy Debate22435–461.
77.
SchwartzA, 2006Housing Policy in the United States (Routledge, New York).
78.
SchwartzD CFerlautoR CHoffmanD N, 1988A New Housing Policy for America: Recapturing the American Dream (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA).
79.
SitesW, 2003Remaking New York: Primitive Globalization and the Politics of Urban Community (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN).
80.
SquiresG D, (Ed.), 2003Organizing Access to Capital: Advocacy and the Democratization of Financial Institutions (Temple University Press, Philadelpia, PA).
81.
StegmanM A, 1996, “National urban policy revisited: Policy options for the Clinton administration”, in Race, Poverty, and American Cities Eds BogerJ CWegnerJ W, (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC) pp 228–269.
82.
StegmanM AHoldenJ D, 1987Nonfederal Housing Programs: How States and Localities are Responding to Federal Cutbacks in Low-income HousingUrban Land InstituteWashington, DC.
83.
StoeckerR, 1997a, “The CDC model of urban redevelopment: A critique and an alternative”Journal of Urban Affairs191–22.
84.
StoeckerR, 1997b, “Should we, could we, change the CDC model? A rejoiner”Journal of Urban Affairs1935–44.
85.
StoeckerR, 2003a, “Understanding the development–organizing dialectic”Journal of Urban Affairs25493–512.
86.
StoeckerR, 2003b, “Comment on William M Rohe and Rachel G Bratt's ‘Failures, downsizings, and mergers among community development corporations’: Defending community development corporations or defending communities?”Housing Policy Debate1447–56.
87.
VidalA, 1992Rebuilding Communities: A National Study of Urban Community Development CorporationsCommunity Development Research Center, New School for Social Research, New York.
88.
Von HoffmanA, 2003House by House, Block by Block: The Rebirth of America's Urban Neighborhoods (Oxford University Press, New York).
89.
YinJ, 1998, “The community development industry system: A case study of politics and institutions in Cleveland, 1967–1997”Journal of Urban Affairs20137–157.
90.
ZdenekBWalshD, 2009, “A unified voice for the nonprofit development field”Shelterforce fall/winter, pages 22–25.
