What happens when a gender requirement is introduced into a Norwegian innovation policy programme? We apply a critical theoretical and methodological approach using the concept of articulation to analyse how meanings of gender are constructed, and how power struggles are part of it. Taking a multilevel approach and using multiple data sources, we examine articulations at the national, regional, and project levels. We find that gender articulations are in line with hegemonic conceptualisations of gender as a variable and as a nonissue to innovation but also detect attempts to challenge the dominant understanding of gender. Demands ‘from above’ have an effect at all levels as the threat of negative reactions encourages a certain self-disciplining, but the demands do not ensure an integration of a gender perspective in the policy programme. We suggest that, when seeking to integrate gender perspectives in policy programmes, the rationale needs to be clear and understood at all programme levels.
AhlH., 2004The Scientific Reproduction of Gender Inequality: A Discourse Analysis of Research Texts on Women's Entrepreneurship (Liber, Malmö).
2.
AlsosG ASteen-JensenR.LjunggrenE., 2011, “Gender and entrepreneurship: Revealing constructions and underlying processes. The case of Norway”, in Women's Entrepreneurship and Growth Influences: An International Perspective Eds BrushC GGatewoodE JDe BruinA.HenryC. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 40–56.
3.
BacchiC L, 1999Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems (Sage, London).
4.
BillingY DAlvessonM., 1989, “Four ways of looking at women and leadership”Scandinavian Journal of Management563–80.
5.
BlakeM KHansonS., 2005, “Rethinking innovation: Context and gender”Environment and Planning A37681–701.
6.
BorlaugS BGrünfeldL.GulbrandsenM.RasmussenE.RønningL.SpillingO RVinogradovE., 2009, “Between entrepreneurship and technology transfer: Evaluation of the FORNY programme”, NIFU Step Rapport 19/2009, NIFU Step, Oslo.
7.
BrooksbankD., 2008, “Guest editorial”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26287–291.
8.
ButlerJ., 1990Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (Routledge, New York).
9.
ByravanS., 2008, “Gender and innovation in South Asia”, Innovation, Policy and Science Program Area, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.
10.
CharmazK., 2006Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, London).
11.
CozzensS E, 2008, “Gender issues in US science and technology policy: Equality of what?”Science Engineering Ethics14345–356.
12.
Departementa, 2008Handlingsplan for meir entreprenørskap blant kvinnerOslo.
13.
FagerbergJ.MoweryD.NelsonR R, 2005The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
14.
FaircloughN., 1989Language and Power (Longman, London).
15.
FenwickT., 2004, “What happens to the girls? Gender, work and learning in Canada's ‘new economy’”Gender and Education16170–185.
16.
FergusonL., 2010, “Interrogating ‘gender’ in development policy and practice”International Feminist Journal of Politics123–24.
17.
Fürst HörteG., 2009, “Utvärdering behovet av genusperspektiv-om innovation, hållbar tillväxt og jämställdhet”, Vinnova Rapport 2009:16, Stockholm.
18.
HalfordS., 2003, “Gender and organizational restructuring in the national health service: Performances, identity and politics”Antipode35287–308.
19.
HallS., 1980, “Race, articulation and societies structured in dominance”, in Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism (Unesco, Paris) pp 305–345.
20.
HallS., 1985, “Significance, representation, ideology: Althusser and the poststructuralist debates”Critical Studies in Mass Communication291–114.
21.
HallS., 1986, “On postmodernism and articulation”Journal of Communication Inquiry1045–60.
22.
HallS., 1995, “The Whites of their eyes: Racist ideologies and the media”, in Gender, Race, and Class in the Media Eds DinesG.HumezJ. (Sage, London) pp 18–22.
23.
HardingS., 1986The Science Question in Feminism (Cornell University Press, New York).
24.
HernesH., 1987Welfare State and Women's Power: Essays in State Feminism (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo).
25.
HoltonJ A, 2007, “The coding process and its challenges”, in The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory Eds BryantA.CharmazK. (Sage, London) pp 265–289.
26.
HubermanA MMilesB M, 1994, “Data management and analysis methods”, in Handbook of Qualitative Research Eds DenzinN KLincolnY S, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 428–444.
27.
HuqA.MoyeenA., 2011, “Gender integration in enterprise development programmes”Womens Studies International Forum34320–328.
28.
KatilaS.MeriläinenS., 1999, “A serious researcher or just another nice girl? Doing gender in a male-dominated scientific community”Gender, Work and Organization6163–173.
29.
KelanE K, 2007, “I don't know why—accounting for the scarcity of women in ICT work”Women's Studies International Forum30499–511.
30.
KristensenG K, 2010, “Trad eller trendy med tre? Om barnetall, likestilling og ‘norskhet’”, in Likestilte norskheter. Om kjønn og etnisitet Eds BergA JFlemmenA BGullikstadB. (Tapir Akademiske, Trondheim) pp 71–100.
31.
KvidalT., 2008Promise or Predicament? Negotiating Identity in the Context of GlobalizationPhD dissertation, Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
32.
KvidalT.LjunggrenE., 2010, “Of course gender is important, I'm just not sure in what way”, in Gender and Innovation—Learning from Regional VRI-Projects NF-report 2/2010 (Nordland Research Institute, Bodø;) pp 66–112.
33.
LaclauE., 1977Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory (New Left Books, London).
34.
LeeN., 2011, “Are innovative regions more unequal? Evidence from Europe”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy292–23.
35.
LindbergM., 2008, “Ett slående mönster: Hur Sveriges innovationspolitik formar genus och vice versa”Genus i Norrsken23–12.
36.
LindbergM., 2010Samverkansnätverk för innovation. En interaktiv och genusvetenskaplig utmaning av innovationspolitik och innovationsforskningPhD dissertation, Luleå Technological University, Luleå.
37.
LjunggrenE., 2002Entreprenørskap og kjønn. En kunnskapsreise mellom to perspektiver: Fraindivid til relasjonPhD dissertation, School of Business and Economics, Umeå Universitet, Umeå.
38.
LjunggrenE.AlsosG A, 2010, “Gender and innovation: Conceptualizations of concepts”, in Gender and Innovation—Learning from Regional VRI-Projects NF-report 2/2010 (Nordland Research Institute, Bodø, Norway) pp 20–40.
39.
LundvallB-Å, (Ed.) 1992National Systems of Innovation (Pinter, London).
40.
LykkeN., 2009Genusforskning—en guide till feministisk teori, metodologi och skrift (Liber, Stockholm).
41.
McGeeM C, 1990, “Text, context, and the fragmentation of contemporary culture”Western Journal of Speech Communication54274–289.
42.
McKerrowR E, 1989, “Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis”Communication Monographs5691–111.
43.
McKerrowR E, 1998, “Corporeality and cultural rhetoric: A site for rhetoric's future”Southern Communication Journal6315–328.
44.
MarlowS.CarterS.ShawE., 2008, “Constructing female entrepreneurship policy in UK: Is US the relevant benchmark?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26335–351.
45.
MartinP Y, 2006, “Practising gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity”Gender, Work and Organization13254–276.
46.
MatlandR E, 1995, “Synthesizing the implementation literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of policy implementation”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory5145–174.
47.
MiddletonM KSenda-CookS.EndresD., 2011, “Articulating rhetorical field methods: Challenges and tensions”Western Journal of Communication75386–406.
48.
MooreK.GriffithsM.RichardsonH.AdamA., 2008, “Gendered futures? Women, the ICT workplace and stories of the future”Gender, Work and Organization15523–542.
49.
MorrisR.WanderP., 1990, “Native American rhetoric: Dancing in the shadows of the ghost dance”Quarterly Journal of Speech76164–191.
50.
NormannR., 2007Democracy in Development—A Critical View on Regional GovernancePhD dissertation, Department of Industrial Economy and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
PetterssonK., 2007Men and Male as the Norm?—A Gender Perspective on Innovation Policies in Denmark, Finland and Sweden Nordregioreport:4 (Nordregio, Stockholm).
54.
PettersonK.SaarinenY., 2004, “Kluster som regionalpolitisk redskap ur et könsperspektiv—män som manliga hjältar i manlig kluster”, Emma Resursscentrum, Vilhelmina.
55.
RamM.JonesT., 2008, “Ethnic-minority businesses in the UK: A review of research and policy develoments”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26352–374.
56.
ReesT., 2000, “The learning region? Integrating gender equality into regional economic development”Policy and Politics28179–191.
57.
RobsonP J AJackS LFreelM S, 2006, “Gender and the use of business advice: Evidence from firms in the Scottish service sector”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26292–314.
58.
RouseJ.KitchingJ., 2006, “Do enterprise support programmes leave women holding the baby?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy245–19.
59.
SchumpeterJ A, 1934The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
60.
SchumpeterJ A, 1942Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Unwin, London).
61.
SlackJ D, 1996, “The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies in Stuart Hall”, in Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies Eds MorleyD.ChenK H, (Routledge, London) pp 113–130.
62.
StrohmeyerR.TonoyanV., 2005, “Bridging the gender gap in employment growth: On the role of innovativeness and occupational segregation”The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation6259–273.
63.
Van der RoosJ., 1996, “Femokrat, hva slags fugl er nå det?”, in Hun og han—Kjønn i forskning og politikk Eds HolterH.HalsaaB.Van der RoosJ.SkjønsbergE.ØvrelidB. (Pax, Oslo) pp 195–219.
64.
VRI, Programme for Regional R&D and Innovation, Oslo.
WarrenH., 2005, “Using gender-analysis frameworks: Theoretical and practical reflections”Gender and Development15187–198.
71.
WilsonL.WhittamG.DeakinsD., 2004, “Women's enterprise: A critical examination of national policies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22799–815.
72.
Winther JørgensenM.PhillipsL., 2010Diskursanalyse som teori og metode (Roskilde Universitetsforlag, Roskilde).
