Limited quantitative research has been devoted to voluntary climate actions at the local level. It is unclear why some cities act as leaders in the fight against climate change, some act as followers, while others remain laggards. This study tests hypotheses about local climate proactiveness to mitigate climate change. Applying a survival analysis to California cities' adoption of the US Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, I examine the association between cities' adoption of the agreement, a range of cities' characteristics, and the behavior of neighboring jurisdictions. The results suggest important roles of the overall capacity of a local jurisdiction, its staff capacity with relevant expertise, average household income level, and voter preferences. Study results also suggest the importance of local traffic conditions and the positive peer effect.
BerryF SBaybeckB, 2005, “Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition”American Political Science Review99505–519
2.
BerryF SBerryW D, 1990, “State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis”American Political Science Review84395–415
3.
BetsillM M, 2001, “Mitigating climate change in US cities: Opportunities and obstacles”Local Environment6393–406
4.
BetsillM MBulkeleyH, 2006, “Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change”Global Governance12141–159
5.
BetsillM MBulkeleyH, 2007, “Looking back and thinking ahead: A decade of cities and climate change research”Local Environment12447–456
6.
BorickC PLachapelleERabeB G, 2011, “Climate compared: Public opinion on climate change in the United States and Canada”, Brookings Institution Issues in Governance Studies No. 39, Washington, DC
7.
BreslowN, 1974, “Covariance analysis of censored survival data”Biometrics3089
8.
BulkeleyH, 2010, “Cities and the governing of climate change”Annual Review of Environment and Resources35229–253
9.
BulkeleyHBetsillM M, 2003Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance (Routledge, New York)
10.
ClevesMGutierrezRGouldWMarchenkoY, 2008An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata2nd edition (Stata Press, College Station, TX)
11.
Climate Action Team, 2006Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the LegislatureCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento
12.
Corfee-MorlotJKamal-ChaouiLDonovanM GCochranIRobertATeasdaleP J, 2009, “Cities, climate change and multilevel governance”, WP 14, OECD Environmental Working Papers, OECD, Paris
13.
CoxD R, 1975, “Partial likelihood”Biometrika62269
14.
CrainR L, 1966, “Fluoridation: Diffusion of an innovation among cities”Social Forces44467–476
15.
DownsA, 1972, “Up and down with ecology: The ‘issue-attention cycle’”The Public Interest2838–50
16.
EngelK HOrbachB Y, 2008, “Micro-motives for state and local climate change initiatives”Harvard Law and Policy Review2119–137
17.
GlaeserE LKahnM E, 2008, “The greenness of cities”, Rappaport Institute/Taubman Center Policy Briefs, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA
18.
GoreCRobinsonP, 2009, “Local government response to climate change: Our last, best hope?”, in Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance Eds SelinHVanDeveerS D (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 137–158
19.
Governor's Office of Planning and Research, 2009The California Planners 'Book of Lists 2009Sacramento, CA
20.
GrahamEShipanC RVoldenC, 2012, “The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science”British Journal of Political Science doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000415
21.
GrambschP MTherneauT M, 1994, “Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals”Biometrika81515–526
22.
JaffeA BStavinsR N, 1994, “Energy efficiency: What does it mean?”Energy Policy22804–810
23.
KahnM E, 2006Green Cities: Urban Growth and the Environment (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
24.
KouskyCSchneiderS H, 2003, “Global climate policy: Will cities lead the way?”Climate Policy3359–372
25.
KrauseR M, 2011, “Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US cities”Journal of Urban Affairs3345–60
26.
LevineM DKoomeyJ GMcMahonJ ESanstadA HHirstE, 1995, “Energy efficiency policy and market failures”Annual Review of Energy and the Environment20535–555
27.
LindsethG, 2004, “The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCPC) and the framing of local climate policy”Local Environment9325–336
MintromM, 1997, “Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation”American Journal of Political Science41738–770
30.
MossbergerK, 2005, “Policy diffusion”, in Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policysupplement edition, Ed. RabinJ (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) pp 922–926
31.
PortneyK E, 2003Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously: Economic Development, the Environment, and Quality of Life in American Cities (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
32.
PrakashAPotoskiM, 2006, “Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001”American Journal of Political Science50350–364
33.
RabeB G, 2007, “Beyond Kyoto: Climate change policy in multilevel governance systems”Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions20423–444
34.
RobertsD, 2008, “Thinking globally, acting locally: Institutionalizing climate change at the local government level in Durban, South Africa”Environment and Urbanization20521–537
35.
SaffellD CBasehartH, 2008State and Local Government: Politics and Public Policies9th edition (McGraw Hill, Columbus, OH)
36.
SchoenfeldD, 1982, “Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model”Biometrika69239–241
37.
SchreursM A, 2008, “From the bottom up: Local and subnational climate change politics”The Journal of Environment and Development17343–355
38.
SelinHVanDeveerS D, 2007, “Political science and prediction: What's next for US climate change policy?”Review of Policy Research241–27
39.
ShipanC RVoldenC, 2008, “The mechanisms of policy diffusion”American Journal of Political Science52840–857
TrueJMintromM, 2001, “Transnational networks of policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming”International Studies Quarterly4527–57
42.
WalkerJ L, 1969, “The diffusion of innovations among the American states”, American Political Science Review63880–899
43.
ZahranSGroverHBrodyS DVedlitzA, 2008a, “Risk, stress, and capacity: Explaining metropolitan commitment to climate protection”Urban Affairs Review43447–474
44.
ZahranSBrodyS DVedlitzAGroverHMillerC, 2008b, “Vulnerability and capacity: Explaining local commitment to climate-change policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26544–562
