How does the EU affect policy making by regional governments in Norway, a unitary nonmember state? We address this question through examining the impact of participation in the Interreg programme on Norwegian county councils' regional development policies. We examine forty-four acts of participation by Norwegian counties in Interreg projects, tracking their effects on both incremental policy changes and radical changes of policy direction. We find that most of the projects have resulted in policy changes by the county council and sometimes by other actors, and almost a third have resulted in a completely or partly new policy direction. Examining which projects had the greatest impact, we find that the county council's ability to shape the project according to regional concerns, especially in newly formed networks, is an important mediating condition. This could indicate that regional governments are using Interreg as a channel for policy entrepreneurship, building activities in new policy areas.
AldecoaFKeatingM (Eds), 1999Paradiplomacy in Action: The Foreign Relations of Subnational Governments (Frank Cass, London)
2.
BacheIFlindersM, 2004Multi-level Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
3.
BaldersheimHFimreiteA L, 2005, “Norwegian centre-periphery relations in flux: Abolition or restructuring of regional governance?”West European Politics28764–780
4.
BaldersheimHHaugA VØygårdM, 2009The Rise of the Networking Region: The Challenges of Regional Collaboration in a Globalized WorldNordregio, Stockholm
5.
BauerM WAartsB, 2000, “Corpus construction: A principle for qualitative data collection”, in Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook Eds BauerM WGaskellG (Sage, London) pp 19–37
6.
BörzelT, 2002States and Regions in the European Union: Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
7.
BörzelTRisseT, 2003, “Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe”, in The Politics of Europeanization Eds FeatherstoneKRadaelliC (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 57–81
8.
BursensPDeforcheJ, 2008, “Europeanization of subnational polities: The impact of domestic factors on regional adaption to European integration”Regional and Federal Studies181–18
9.
ChurchAReidP, 1996, “Urban power, international networks and competition: The example of cross-border cooperation”Urban Studies33297–318
10.
CotsFTábaraJ DMcEvoyDWernersSRocaE, 2009, “Cross-border organisations as an adaptive water management response to climate change: The case of the Guadiana river basin”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27876–893
11.
DardanelliP, 2005Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
12.
DührSNadinV, 2007, “Europeanization through transnational territorial cooperation? The case of INTERREG IIIB North-West Europe”Planning Practice and Research22373–394
13.
DührSSteadDZonneveldW, 2007, “The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation”Planning Practice and Research22291–307
14.
DysonKGoetzK H, 2003, “Living with Europe: Power, constraint and contestation”, in Germany, Europe and the Politics of Constraint Eds DysonKGoetzK H (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 3–36
15.
EgebergMTrondalJ, 1999, “Differentiated integration in Europe: The case of the EEA country Norway”Journal of Common Market Studies37133–142
16.
FalknerG, 2001, “The Europeanisation of Austria: Misfit, adaptation and controversies”European Integration Online Papers5(13), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2001-013.pdf
17.
FitjarR D, 2009The Rise of Regionalism: Causes of Regional Mobilization in Western Europe (Routledge, London)
18.
GreenwoodJ, 2003Interest Representation in the European Union (Macmillan, London)
19.
GrindheimJ E, 2004, “Norway”, in The Nordic Regions and the European Union Eds DosenrodeSHalkierH (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 55–75
20.
HachmannV, 2008, “Promoting learning in transnational networks”disP17211–20
21.
HarguindéguyJ-BBrayZ, 2009, “Does cross-border cooperation empower European regions? The case of INTERREG III-A France—Spain”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27747–760
22.
HoogheLMarksG, 2001Multi-level Governance and European Integration (Rowman and Littlefield, Oxford)
23.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelA, 2010The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies (Routledge, London)
24.
HuebnerMStellfeldt-KochC, 2009Impacts and Benefits of Transnational Projects (INTERREG IIIB) (BBR, Bonn)
25.
JefferyC, 2000, “Sub-national mobilization and European integration”Journal of Common Market Studies381–24
26.
KeatingM, 1997, “The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy15383–398
27.
KeatingM, 1998The New Regionalism in Western Europe (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
28.
KnillCLehmkuhlD, 2002, “The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms”. European Journal of Political Research41255–280
29.
MarksGNielsenFRayLSalkJ E, 1996, “Competencies, cracks, and conflicts: Regional mobilization in the European Union”Comparative Political Studies29164–192
30.
MartinsLÅlvarezRodríguez J M, 2007, “Towards glocal leadership: Taking up the challenge of new local governance in Europe”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25391–409
31.
MedeirosE J R, 2010, “Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal—Spain and Norway-Sweden”Area42434–443
32.
NeubauerJDuboisAHanellTLähteenmäki-SmithKPetterssonKRotoJSteinekeJ M, 2007Regional Development in the Nordic Countries 2007Nordregio, Stockholm
33.
Norwegian EEA Review Committee, 2012Utenfor og innenfor: Norges avtaler med EU Norwegian Official Report 2012:2, Norwegian Government, Oslo
34.
ParaskevopoulosC J, 2001Interpreting Convergence in the European Union: Patterns of Collective Action, Social Learning and Europeanization (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
35.
PedrazziniL, 2005, “Applying the ESDP through Interreg IIIB: A Southern perspective”European Planning Studies13297–317
36.
PerkmannM, 2003, “Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation”European Urban and Regional Studies10153–171
37.
PerkmannM, 2007, “Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25861–879
38.
PikeARodríguez-PoseATomaneyJTorrisiGTseliosV, 2012, “In search of the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution: Spatial disparities, spatial economic policy, and decentralisation in the UK”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy3010–28
RaginC C, 2000Fuzzy-set Social Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
41.
RaginC C, 2006, “Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage”. Political Analysis14291–310
42.
RaginC CDrassK ADaveyS, 2006Fuzzy-set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
43.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN, 2003, “The global trend towards devolution and its implications”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21333–351
44.
Rodríguez-PoseASandallR, 2008, “From identity to the economy: Analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2654–72
45.
SchneiderC QWagemannC, 2010, “Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets”Comparative Sociology9397–418
46.
ThatcherM, 2004, “Winners and losers in Europeanisation: Reforming the national regulation of telecommunications”West European Politics27284–309
47.
TrondalJ, 2002, “The Europeanisation of research and higher educational policies: Some reflections”Scandinavian Political Studies25333–355
48.
TsebelisG, 2002Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
49.
WeyandS, 2001, “Inter-regional associations and the European integration process”, in The Regional Dimension of the European Union: Towards a Third Level in Europe? Ed. JefferyC (Frank Cass, London) pp 166–182
50.
WinkR, 2010, “Transregional institutional learning in Europe: Prerequisites, actors and limitations”Regional Studies44499–511
