With this paper we analyze Minneapolis's urban food policy regime and attempt to make a case for applying urban regime theory (URT) to study climate change governance at the municipal level. In 2008 Minneapolis launched Homegrown Minneapolis, a multiple stakeholder initiative bringing together local government actors, businesses, and NGOs to build a sustainable and local food system. As the link between food systems and climate change is increasingly acknowledged in the literature, the analysis of food policy regimes provides valuable lessons for understanding the dynamics of urban climate governance. Theoretically, we attempt to contribute to the fields of urban climate governance and urban political theory by applying URT as developed by urban political theorist Clarence N Stone and others. To this end, a ‘building blocks’ approach is introduced, facilitating and enhancing the analysis of the different elements of a regime, including initiation, coalition building, agenda setting, resources, cooperation, and consensus building. We show that there are several key elements comprising successful regimes: individual political leadership, knowledge exchange, and community-wide collaborative engagement.
BetsillM MBulkeleyH., 2007, “Looking back and thinking ahead: A decade of cities and climate change research”Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability12447–456.
2.
BouteligierS., 2012Cities, Networks, and Global Environmental Governance: Spaces of Innovation, Places of Leadership (Routledge, London).
3.
BulkeleyH.BetsillM M, 2005, “Rethinking sustainable cities multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change”Environmental Politics1442–63.
4.
BulkeleyH.BetsillM M, 2006Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance (Routledge, London).
5.
BulkeleyH.KernK., 2006, “Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK”Urban Studies432237–2259.
6.
CFS, 2012Food Security and Climate Change: A Report by the High-level Panel on Food Security and NutritionCommittee on World Food Security, Rome.
CollierU., 1997, “Local authorities and climate protection in the European Union putting subsidiarity into practice?”Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability239–57.
14.
DahlR A, 1961Who Governs? Power and Democracy in an American City (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
15.
DaviesJ S, 2003, “Partnerships vs regimes: Why regime theory cannot explain urban coalitions in the UK”Journal of Urban Affairs25253–276.
16.
DeAngeloB JHarveyD L D, 1998, “The jurisdictional framework for municipal action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Case studies from Canada, the USA and German”Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability3111–136.
ElkinS L, 1987City and Regime in the American Republic (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
19.
EricksenP JIngramJ S ILivermanD M, 2009, “Food security and global environmental change: Emerging challenges”Environmental Science and Technology12373–377.
20.
FAO, 2009How to Feed the World in 2050 Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
21.
GreasleyS.StokerG., 2009, “Urban political leadership”, in Theories of Urban Politics2nd edition, Eds DaviesS J SImbroscioD L, (Sage, London) pp 125–136.
22.
HardingA., 2009, “The history of community power”, in Theories of Urban Politics2nd edition, Eds DaviesJ SImbroscioD L, (Sage, London) pp 27–39.
23.
HertwichE G, 2005, “Life-cycle approaches to sustainable consumption: A critical review”Environmental Science and Technology394673–4684.
24.
HoogheL.MarksG., 2003, “Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance”American Political Science Review97233–242.
25.
HunterF., 1953Community Power Structure (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC).
26.
ImbroscioD L, 1998, “Reformulating urban regime theory: The division of labor between state and market reconsidered”Journal of Urban Affairs20233–248.
27.
IPCC, 2007Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Eds ParryM LCanzianiO FPalutikofJ PVan der LindenP JHansonC E, contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
28.
JudgeD.StokerG.WolmanH., 1995, “Urban politics and theory an introduction”, in Theories of Urban Politics Eds JudgeD.StokerG.WolmanH. (Sage, London) pp 1–12.
29.
KouskyC.SchneiderS H, 2003, “Global climate policy: Will cities lead the way?”Climate Policy3359–372,.
30.
KrauseR M, 2011, “Symbolic or substantive policy? Measuring the extent of local commitment to climate protection”Environment and Planning C Government and Policy2946–62.
31.
KrauseR M, 2012, “Political decision-making and the local provision of public goods: The case of municipal climate protection in the US”Urban Studies492399–2417.
32.
LyndR SLyndH M, 1929Middletown (Harcourt Brace, New York).
33.
LyndR SLyndH M, 1937Middletown in Transition (Harcourt Brace, New York).
34.
MacKillopF., 2012, “Climatic city: Two centuries of urban planning and climate science in Manchester (UK) and its region”Cities29244–251.
RosenzweigC.SoleckiW DHammerS AMehrotraS., (Eds) 2011Climate Change and Cities: First Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network (Cambridge University Press, New York).
45.
RossB HLevineM A, 2012Urban Politics Cities and Suburbs in a Global Age8th edition (M E Sharpe, New York).
46.
SchreursM., 2008, “From the bottom up: Local and subnational climate change politics”The Journal of Environment and Development17343–355.
47.
SewellW H, 1992, “A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation”American Journal of Sociology981–29.
48.
StokerG., 1995, “Regime theory and urban politics”, in Theories of Urban Politics Eds JudgeD.StokerG.WolmanH. (Sage, London) pp 54–71.
49.
StokerG.MossbergerK., 1994, “Urban regime theory in comparative perspective”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy12195–212.
50.
StoneC N, 1989Regime Politics Governing Atlanta 1946–1988 (University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS).
51.
StoneC N, 1993, “Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach”Journal of Urban Affairs151–28.
52.
StoneC N, 1998Changing Urban Education (University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS).
53.
StoneC N, 2004, “It's more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes”Journal of Urban Affairs261–19.
54.
StoneC N, 2005, “Looking back to look forward: Reflections on urban regime analysis”Urban Affairs Review40309–341.
55.
StoneC N, 2006, “Power, reform and urban regime analysis”City and Community523–38.
56.
StoneC NHenigJ RJonesB DPierannunziC., 2001Building Civic Capacity: The Politics of Reforming Urban Schools (University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS).
57.
TolyN J, 2008, “Transnational municipal networks and climate change: From global governance to global politics”Globalizations5341–356.
58.
TukkerA.JansenB., 2006, “Environment impacts of products: A detailed review of studies”Journal of Industrial Ecology10159–182.
59.
VermeulenS JCampbellB MIngramJ S I, 2012, “Climate change and food systems”Annual Review of Environment and Resources37195–222.
60.
WeberC LMatthewsH S, 2008, “Food-miles and the relative impacts of food choices in the United States”Environmental Science and Technology423508–3513.
61.
WolfingerR E, 1974The Politics of Progress (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
62.
WynenE.VanzettiD., 2008No Through Road: The Limitations of Food MilesAsia Development Bank Institute, Tokyo.
63.
YinR K, 2009Case Study Research Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
