With this paper I analyse how policy agendas are being shaped and reshaped in new soft spaces emerging in Danish spatial planning at subnational scales, and how policy making in these soft spaces seeks to influence formal planning arenas. The paper demonstrates how the new soft planning spaces in Danish spatial planning primarily are concerned with promoting policy agendas centred on economic development, whilst doing limited work in filling in the gaps between formal scales of planning, as envisaged in the planning literature. Instead, soft spaces seem to add to the increasing pressures on statutory spatial planning, being used as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning. I therefore argue for a need to maintain a critical stance towards the emergence of soft spaces in spatial planning.
AlbrechtsL, 2001, “How to proceed from image and discourse to action: As applied to the Flemish Diamond”Urban Studies38733–745
2.
AlbrechtsL, 2004, “Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31743–758
3.
AllmendingerP, 2011New Labour and Planning: From New Right to New Left (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon)
4.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG, 2007, “The fluid scales and scope of UK planning”Environment and Planning A391478–1496
5.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG, 2009a, “Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway”Environment and Planning A41617–633
6.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG, 2009b, “Critical reflections on spatial planning”Environment and Planning A412544–2549
7.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG, 2010, “Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28803–818
8.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG, 2012, “Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus?”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3789–103
9.
AndersenH T, 2008, “The emerging Danish government reform: Centralised decentralisation”Urban Research and Practice13–17
10.
BrennerN, 2004aNew State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood (Oxford University Press, New York)
11.
BrennerN, 2004b, “Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960–2000”Review of International Political Economy11447–488
12.
BrownillSCarpenterJ, 2009, “Governance and ‘integrated’ planning: The case of sustainable communities in the Thames Gateway, England”Urban Studies46251–274
13.
BundgaardUVrangbækK, 2007, “Reform by coincidence? Explaining the policy process of structural reform in Denmark”Scandinavian Political Studies30491–520
14.
CastellsM, 1996The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Oxford)
15.
ConnellySRichardsonT, 2004, “Exclusion: The necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management473–17
DavoudiSStrangeI (Eds), 2009Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning (Routledge, London)
18.
de VriesJ, 2008, “Breaking the deadlock: Lessons from cross-border spatial projects in Flanders and the Netherlands”disP17248–61
19.
DührS, 2007The Visual Language of Spatial Planning: Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning in Europe (Routledge, London)
20.
FabbroSHaselsbergerB, 2009, “Spatial planning harmonisation as a condition for trans-national cooperation: The case of the Alpine-Adriatic Area”European Planning Studies171335–1356
21.
GoodwinMJonesMJonesR, 2005, “Devolution, constitutional change and economic development: Explaining and understanding the new institutional geographies of the British state”Regional Studies39421–436
22.
GrahamSHealeyP, 1999, “Relational concepts for space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice”European Planning Studies7623–646
23.
GreenwoodDNewmanP, 2010, “Markets, large projects and sustainable development: Traditional and new planning in the Thames Gateway”Urban Studies47105–119
24.
HajerM, 2000, “Transnational networks as transnational policy discourse: Some observations on the politics of spatial development in Europe”, in The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning Eds SaletWFaludiA (Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam) pp 135–142
25.
HarrisNHooperA, 2004, “Rediscovering the ‘spatial’ in public policy and planning: An examination of the spatial content of sectoral policy documents”Planning Theory and Practice5147–169
26.
HaughtonGAllmendingerPCounsellDVigarG, 2010The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon)
27.
HealeyP, 2004, “The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2845–67
28.
HealeyP, 2006, “Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning”European Planning Studies14525–546
29.
HealeyP, 2007Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times (Routledge, London)
30.
JensenO BRichardsonT, 2003, “Being on the map: The new iconographies of power over European space”International Planning Studies89–34
31.
JessopB, 1997, “The entrepreneurial city: Re-imaging localities, redesigning economic governance, or restructuring capital”, in Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions Eds JewsonNMacGregorS (Routledge, London) pp 28–41
32.
JessopB, 2000, “The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the ecological dominance of globalizing”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24323–360
33.
JessopB, 2003“Governance and metagovernance: Reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony”, in Governance as Social and Political Communication Ed. BangH (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 101–116
34.
JonesRGoodwinMJonesMPettK, 2005, “‘Filling in’ the state: Economic governance and the evolution of devolution in Wales”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23337–360
35.
MetzgerJ, 2011, “Neither revolution, nor resignation: (re)democratizing contemporary planning praxis: A commentary on Allmendinger and Haughton's ‘Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces’”Environment and Planning C: Policy and Government29191–196
36.
Ministry of the Environment, 2006, “The New Map of Denmark”, English summary, Ministry of the Environment, Danish Forestry and Nature Agency, Copenhagen
37.
Ministry of the Environment, 2007, “Fingerplan 2007: Landsplandirektiv for Hovedstadsområdets Planlægning”, Ministry of the Environment, Danish Forestry and Nature Agency, Copenhagen
38.
MorphetJ, 2010, “The new spatial planning territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries”Planning Theory and Practice11628–630
39.
MorphetJ, 2011Effective Practice in Spatial Planning (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon)
40.
MouritzenP E, 2004, “Strukturreformen som en Skraldespand”Administrativ Debat49–14
41.
OlesenKRichardsonT, 2011, “The spatial politics of spatial representation: Relationality as a medium for depoliticisation?”International Planning Studies16355–375
42.
PurcellM, 2006, “Urban democracy and the local trap”Urban Studies431921–1941
43.
SaletWThornleyAKreukelsA, 2003Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning: Comparative Case Studies of European City-regions (Spon, London)
44.
SørensenESehestedKReffA Eds, 2011Offentligt Styring som Pluricentrisk Koordination (Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, Copenhagen)
45.
Tewdwr-JonesMGallentNMorphetJ, 2010, “An anatomy of spatial planning: Coming to terms with the spatial element in UK planning”European Planning Studies18239–257
46.
van DuinenL, 2004Planning Imaginary: The Emergence and Development of New Planning Concepts in Dutch National Spatial Policy PhD dissertation, Faculteit der Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
47.
ZonneveldW, 2000, “Discoursive aspects of strategic planning: A deconstruction of the ‘balanced competitiveness’ concept in European spatial planning”, in The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning Eds SaletWFaludiA (Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam) pp 267–280
