The financialised character of contemporary rationalities of public governance has been the subject of increased attention within a range of disciplinary and interdisciplinary fields. With this paper we propose a particular analytical framework, focused on the notion of ‘governance devices’, for understanding the processes that underpin financialised governance and, more fundamentally, maintain the connections between markets and politics. Deploying three distinct cases, we indicate that these devices transcend divisions between the actor and the device and create a different form of agency—an assemblage. We argue that understanding such assemblages—their emergence, activity, and, frequently, their failures—opens a window on analysing the nature of contemporary forms of financialised governance as a technosocial system. In so doing we suggest that the governance devices approach can offer a way of challenging contemporary governance orthodoxies, retracing governments' lost responsibilities and resurfacing their ‘core tasks’.
AbbottA, 2005, “Linked ecologies: States and universities as environments for professions”Sociological Theory23245–274
2.
AgambenG, 2009‘What is an Apparatus?’ and Other Essays (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
3.
AminAThriftN, 2004The Blackwell Cultural Economy Reader (Blackwell, Oxford)
4.
BallRHeafeyMKingD, 2002, “The Private Finance Initiative and public sector finance”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2057–74
5.
BournJ, 2010HM Treasury: Financing PFI Projects in the Credit Crisis and the Treasury's Response report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 287, Session 2010–11, 27 July (The Stationery Office, London)
6.
BroadbentJLaughlinR, 2003, “Public private partnerships: An introduction”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal16332–341
7.
CallonM, 2009, “Economic markets and the rise of interactive agencements: From prosthetic agencies to habilitated agencies”, in Living in a Material World Eds PinchTSwedbergR (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 29–56
8.
CallonMMuniesaF, 2005, “Economic markets as calculative collective devices”Organization Studies261229–1250
CBOE, 1975, “CBOE rules”, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Chicago, IL
11.
ChapmanR, 1996, “The end of the British civil service?”, in The Whitehall Reader Ed. BarberisP (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks) pp 187–191
12.
Civil Service (Management Functions) Act, 1992Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 61 (The Stationery Office, London)
13.
CorbyS, 1993, “How big a step is Next Steps? Industrial relations developments in the civil service executive agencies”Human Resource Management Journal44–19
14.
CraryJ, 1990Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
15.
CrononW, 1991Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West (W W Norton, London)
16.
CrouchC, 2009, “Privatised Keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime”British Journal of Politics and International Relations11382–399
17.
CrouchC, 2011The Strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism (Polity Press, Cambridge)
18.
DeleuzeGGuattariF, 2004A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Continuum, London)
19.
du GayPPrykeM (Eds) 2002Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life (Sage, London)
20.
EdwardsPShaoulJStaffordAArblasterL, 2004, “Evaluating the operation of PFI in roads and hospitals”, RR 84, Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London
21.
Efficiency Unit, 1988, “Improving management in government: The next steps”, report to the Prime Minister (HMSO, London)
22.
EngelenEErtürkIFroudJJohalSLeaverAMoranMNilssonAWilliamsK, 2011After the Great Complacence (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
23.
ErtürkIFroudJJohalSLeaverAWilliamsK (Eds), 2008Financialisation at Work: Key Texts and Commentary (Routledge, London)
24.
FreedlandM, 1994, “Government by contract and public law”Public Law Spring, pages 461–482
25.
FreedlandM, 1996, “The rule against delegation and the Carltona Doctrine in an agency context”Public Law Summer, pages 19–30
26.
GoodhartC, 2010, “How should we regulate the financial sector?”, in The Future of Finance: The LSE Report Eds TurnerAHaldaneAWoolleyPWadhwaniSGoodhartCSmithersALargeAKayJWolfMBoonePJohnsonSLayardR (London School of Economics, London) pp 153–176
27.
Government Trading Act, 1990Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 30 (The Stationery Office, London)
28.
GreenawayJ, 1995, “Having the bun and the halfpenny: Can old public service survive in the new Whitehall?”Public Administration73357–374
29.
GroutP, 1997, “The economics of the private finance initiative”Oxford Review of Economic Policy1353–66
30.
GuillenMSuarezS, 2010, “The global crisis of 2007–2009: Markets, politics and organizations”Research in the Sociology of Organizations30 (Part A) 257–279
31.
HallJ, 1998, “Private opportunity, public benefit?”Fiscal Studies19121–140
32.
HealdD, 2003, “Value for money tests and accounting treatment in PFI schemes”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal16342–371
33.
HM Treasury, 1994, “Private finance: Overview of progress”, news release 118/94, 8 November; cited in House of Commons Library Research Paper, The Private Finance Initiative, 18 December 2001
34.
House of Lords, 2010, “Private finance projects and off-balance sheet debt”, Select Committee on Economic Affairs, 1st Report of Session 2009–10, HL Paper 63–1 (The Stationery Office, London)
35.
JessopB, 2003, “Governance and metagovernance: On refiexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony”, in Governance as Social and Political Communication Ed. BangH P (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 101–116
36.
JessopB, 2007State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach Ed. BangH P (Polity Press, Cambridge)
37.
JessopB, 2009, “Cultural political economy and critical policy studies”Critical Policy Studies3336–356
38.
JessopB, forthcoming, “Imagined recoveries, recovered imaginaries: A cultural political economy perspective”Economy and Society
39.
JessopBSumN-L, 2012, “Cultural political economy, strategic essentialism, and neoliberalism”, in Neoliberal Urbanism and its Contestations: Crossing Theoretical Boundaries Eds KünkelJMayerM (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 80–96
40.
KentZ, 1990The Story of the New York Stock Exchange (Scholastic Library, New York)
41.
KhadarooI, 2008, “The actual evaluation of school PFI bids for value for money in the UK public sector”Critical Perspectives on Accounting191321–1345
42.
LawJ, 1991A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination (Routledge, London)
43.
LawJHassardJ, 1999Actor Network Theory and After (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford)
44.
Le GalesPLascoumbesP, 2007, “Understanding public policy through its instruments: From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation”Governance201–21
45.
LloydC, 2009, “Treasury lending to PFI projects and the Treasury's Infrastructure Finance Unit”, HM Treasury letter from C Lloyd, Head of Public Private Partnerships, 5 May, http://www.hm_treasury.gov.uk/d/ppp_tifu_letter_050509.pdf
46.
LounsburyM, 2003, “Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling”Socio-Economic Review171–104
47.
MacKenzieD, 2002, “The imagined market”London Review of Books24(21) 31
48.
MeulemanL, 2008Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg)
49.
MilloY, 2012, “Accounting for liquidity: The constitution and the demise of the options market makers” (in press)
50.
MorillCZaldMRaoH, 2003, “Covert political conflict in organizations: Challenges from below”Annual Review of Sociology29391–415
51.
O'TooleB, 2006The Ideal of Public Service: Reflections on the Higher Civil Service in Britain (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon)
52.
PerrowC, 2010, “The meltdown was not an accident”, in Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the US Financial Crisis: Part A Eds LounsburyMHirschP (Emerald Group, Bingley, Yorks) pp 309–330
53.
PollockADunniganMGaffneyDMacfarlaneAMajeedAzeem F, 1997, “What happens when the private sector plans hospital services for the NHS: Three case studies under the private finance initiative”British Medical Journal3141266
54.
RooneyD, 2003Public Policy in Knowledge-based Economies: Foundations and Frameworks (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
55.
RoseN, 1999Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
56.
SeligmanJ, 1982The Transformation of Wall Street: A History of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Modern Finance (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA)
57.
ShaoulJ, 2005, “A critical financial analysis of the Private Finance Initiative: Selecting a financing method or allocating economic wealth?”Critical Perspectives on Accouting16441–471
58.
StiglitzJ, 2010, “Contagion, liberalization and the optimal structures of globalization”Journal of Globalization and Development11–45
59.
WallAConnollyC, 2009, “The private finance initiative”Public Management Review11707–724
60.
WoodhouseD, 2004, “Ministerial responsibility”, in The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century Ed. BogdanorV (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 281–332
