Highly centralised countries like Italy and Spain have devolved fiscal power to regions in an asymmetric way. Some well-off regions get transfers that turn them into net recipients of the fiscal system. We demonstrate in a political economy model of fiscal federalism that, in centralised countries, side-payments are used to compensate regions that are set back by the fiscal system and can credibly threaten to secede. Compensation blocks political negotiation on alternative—more efficient—fiscal systems. We study two regions, Valle d'Aosta in Italy and País Vasco in Spain, as an example.
AlesinaAWacziargR, 1998, “Openness, country size and the government”Journal of Public Economics69305–322
2.
AmbrosanioMBordignonM, 2008Il federalismo fiscale in Italia (Il Mulino, Bologna)
3.
AmbrosanioMBordignonMCernigliaF, 2008, “Constitutional reforms, fiscal decentralisation and regional fiscal flows in Italy”, WP 84, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Bologna
4.
ArachiGFerrarioCZanardiA, 2006, “Redistribuzione e ripartizione del rischio fra territori regionali in Italia”, in Federalismo, equità, sviluppo Eds BarcaFCappielloFRavoniLVolpeM, (Il Mulino, Bologna) pp 123–135
5.
BachSBlöchligerHWallauD, 2009, “The spending power of sub-central governments: A pilot study”, WP 705, OECD, Paris
6.
BarberanRUrielE, 2006, “Las balanzas fiscales regionales en España en el periodo 1991–2005”Investigaciones Regionales13115–154
7.
BaronDFerejohnJ, 1989, “Bargaining in legislatures”American Political Science Review8734–47
8.
BesleyTCoateS, 2003, “Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods”Journal of Public Economics872611–2637
9.
BibbeeA, 2007, “Making federalism work in Italy”, WP 590, OECD, Paris
10.
BlöchligerHPetzoldO, 2009, “Taxes and grants: On the revenue mix of sub-central governments”, WP 706, OECD, Paris
11.
BlöchligerHRabesonaJ, 2009, “The fiscal autonomy of sub-central governments: An update”, WP 9, OECD Network on Fiscal Relations, Paris
12.
BlöchligerHMerkOCharbitCMizellL, 2009, “Fiscal equalization in OECD countries”, WP 4, OECD Network on Fiscal Relations, Paris
13.
BoettiLPiacenzaMTuratiG, 2012, “Decentralization and local governments' performance”FinanzArchiv68269–302
14.
BrennanGBuchananJ, 1980The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution (Cambridge, New York)
15.
BrosioGRevelliF, 2000I costi e i benefici economico-finanziari dell'autonomia e dell'integrazione: I rapporti fra Italia e Valle d'Aosta (Le Château, Aosta)
16.
CastellsA, 2000, “Autonomía y solidaridad en el sistema de financiación autonómica”Papeles de Economía8337–59
17.
FeldL PSchnellenbachJ, 2011, “Fiscal federalism and long-run macroeconomic performance: A survey of recent research”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29224–243
18.
Garcia-MilàTMcGuireT, 2007, “Fiscal decentralization in Spain: An asymmetric transition to democracy”, in Fiscal Fragmentation in Decentralized Countries Eds BirdREbelR, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 208–223
19.
HarstadB, 2008, “Do side payments help? Collective decisions and strategic delegation”Journal of the European Economic Association6468–477
20.
JoumardIGiornoC, 2005, “Getting the most out of public sector decentralization in Spain”, WP 436, OECD Economics Department, Paris
21.
KeatingM, 1998, “What's wrong with asymmetrical government?”Regional and Federal Studies8195–218
22.
KeatingM, 1999, “Asymmetrical government: Multinational states in an integrating Europe”Publius2971–86
23.
KyriacouA PRoca-SagalésO, 2011, “Fiscal and political decentralization and government quality”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29204–223
24.
Le BretonMWeberS, 2003, “The art of making everybody happy: How to prevent a secession”International Monetary Fund Staff Papers50403–435
25.
LockwoodB, 2006, “The political economy of decentralization”, in Handbook of Fiscal Federalism Eds AhmadEBrosioG, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 33–60
26.
Martinez-VazquezJMcNabR, 2003, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth”World Development311597–1616
27.
MoraT, 2008, “The relationship between the capacity of the Spanish central government to retain tax-revenue shares and interregional inequality”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26601–613
28.
Órgano de Coordinación Tributaria de Euskadi, 2008Informe Anual Integrado de la Hacienda VascaVitoria
29.
RequejoFNagelK, 2011Federalism beyond Federations: Asymmetry and Processes of Resymmetrization in Europe (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
30.
RiccarandE, 2004Storia della Valle d'Aosta (1945–1981) (Stylos, Aosta)
31.
RoddenJ, 2003, “Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government”International Organization57695–729
32.
RoddenJEskelandGLitwackJ, 2003Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
33.
Rodríguez-PoseA, 1996, “Growth and institutional change: The influence of the Spanish regionalisation process on economic performance”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1471–87
34.
Rodríguez-PoseAGillN, 2005, “On the economic dividend of devolution”Regional Studies39405–420
35.
SorensJ, 2011, “The institutions of fiscal federalism”Publius41207–231
36.
TanziV, 1995, “Fiscal federalism and decentralization: A review of some efficiency and macroeconomic aspects”, in Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics Eds BrunoMPleskovicB, (World Bank, Washington, DC) pp 295–330
37.
ThiessenU, 2003, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in high income OECD countries”Fiscal Studies24273–274
