With this paper we examine the 2004 Olympic Games as an ambivalent catalyst for the implementation of neoliberal urban policies in Athens. We draw upon two distinct analytical streams: first, regulationist scholars' conception of neoliberalization as a path-dependent and, to a large extent, state-led process, and, second, Skocpol's ‘autonomy state’ approach. We argue that the implementation of neoliberal urban policies in Athens has been shaped by a combination of centralism, low central state capacity, organizational and financial weakness of business elites, and citizen movements' opposition. We first provide an overview of Athenian urban policies since the 1960s; then we examine the preparation of the 2004 Olympic Games; and, finally, we investigate the post-Olympic use of Olympic venues, including the period of the current sovereign debt crisis. In the conclusion we emphasize that the bailout agreement between Greece and the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, and the European Union aims at reboosting neoliberal public policies in a radical way.
AfouxenidisA, 2006, “Urban social movements in Southern European cities”City10287–293
2.
ArapoglouVSayasJ, 2009, “New facets of urban segregation in Southern Europe: gender, migration and social class change in Athens”European Urban and Regional Studies16345–362
3.
ATHOC, 2005Official Report of the XXVIII Olympiad: Homecoming of the Games—Organisation and Operations v. 1, Athens 2004Organising Committee for the Olympic GamesSA, http://olympic-museum.de/o-reports/report2004.htm (in Greek)
4.
BassettK, 1996, “Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: new forms of governance in an English city?”Urban Studies33539–555
5.
BenneworthPDaunceyH, 2010, “International urban festivals as a catalyst for governance capacity building”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy281083–1110
6.
BeriatosEGospodiniA, 2004, “‘Glocalising’ urban landscapes: Athens and the 2004 Olympics”Cities21187–202
7.
BramwellB, 1997, “Strategic planning before and after a mega-event”Tourism Management18167–176
8.
BrennerN, 2004New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood (Oxford University Press, New York)
9.
BrennerNTheodoreN, 2002, “Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism'”Antipode34349–379
ChorianopoulosI, 2011, “State spatial restructuring in Greece: forced rescaling, unresponsive localities”European Urban and Regional Studies19331–348
12.
ChorianopoulosIPagonisTKoukoulasSDrymonitiS, 2010, “Planning, competitiveness and sprawl in the Mediterranean city: the case of Athens”Cities27249–259
13.
Committee for the Athens 2004 Candidacy, 1997The Athens 2004 Candidacy Filevolumes I, II, and III, Committee for the Athens 2004 Candidacy, Athens (in Greek)
14.
DelladetsimaP M, 2003, “The Olympic Village: a redevelopment marathon in Greater Athens”, in The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities Eds MoulaertFRodriguezASwyngedouwE (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 65–90
15.
DelladetsimaP M, 2006, “The emerging property development pattern in Greece and its impact on spatial development”European Urban and Regional Studies13245–278
16.
EconomouD, 1988, “Land and housing system in postwar Greece”, in The Problems of Welfare State Development in Greece Eds MaloutasTEconomouD (Exandas, Athens) pp 57–113 (in Greek)
17.
EconomouDGetimisPDemathasZPetrakosGPiryiotisY, 2001The International Role of Athens. (University of Thessaly Press, Volos) (in Greek)
18.
FainsteinS, 2008, “Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32768–785
19.
GetimisPMaravaN, 2004, “New relationships between private and public sector in the construction and function of large projects of infrastructures in Greece: trends and evolutions in 1980s and 1990s”, in Proceedings of the 9th Scientific Conference of the Sakis Karagiorgas Foundation on Social Change in Contemporary GreecePanteion University, Athens, pp 471–498 (in Greek)
20.
GoldM, 2007, “Athens 2004”, in Olympic Cities: City Agendas, Planning and the World's Games, 1896–2012 Eds GoldJ RGoldM (Routledge, London) pp 265–285
21.
GSPA, 2006Revised Regional Operational Program of Attica 2000–6General Secretariat of Periphery of Attica, http://www.pepatt.gr/pep.htm (in Greek)
HabermasJ, 2011Zur Verfassung Europas (Suhrkamp, Berlin)
24.
HabermasJ, 2012On Europe's Constitutions. (Pataki, Athens) (in Greek)
25.
HardingA, 1991, “The rise of urban growth coalitions, UK-style?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy9295–317
26.
HardingA, 1997, “Urban regimes in a Europe of the cities?”European Urban and Regional Studies4291–314
27.
HarveyD, 1989, “From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism”Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography713–17
LehrerULaidleyJ, 2008, “Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32786–803
33.
Leontidou-GerardiK (Ed.), 2004Strategic Framework of Spatial Development for Athens-AtticaMinistry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works; National Technical University of Athens, Department of Architecture, Section of Urbanism and Physical Planning, https://courses.arch.ntua.gr/129900.html (in Greek)
34.
MaloutasT, 2010, “Mobilité sociale et ségrégation à Athénes: formes de séparatisme social dans un contexte de mobilité spatiale réduite”Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales1842–21
35.
MarmarasE, 2003, “Searching the strategic goal of post-Olympic Athens”Architectones3955–59 (in Greek)
36.
MEPPPW, 1999, “Law 2730 on the Planning, Integrated Development and Implementation of Olympic Projects and Other Provisions”, Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works Government Gazette130 25 June (in Greek)
MossbergerKStokerG, 2001, “The evolution of urban regime theory: the challenge of conceptualization”Urban Affairs Review36810–835
39.
MoukoulisPSayasJ, 2007, “Gentrification in Athens? The sociospatial reconstitution of central urban areas: tension and dynamics”, paper presented in the Conference of the International Sociological Association Research Committee 21 on Sociology of Urban and Regional Development ‘Urban justice and sustainability’, 22–25 August, Vancouver, BC; copy available from N Souliotis
40.
MPUE, 1985, “Law 1515 on the Regulatory Plan and Program of Protection of the Environment of the Wider Area of Athens”, Ministry of Planning, Urbanism and Enrichment Government Gazette18 18 February (In Greek)
41.
MPW, 1979Capital 2000. Ministry of Public Works, Athens
PeckJTheodoreNBrennerN, 2010, “Postneoliberalism and its malcontents”Antipode4194–116
44.
Research Team ‘Olympics 2004’, 1998, “Urban and environmental dimension of Olympic Games 2004: alternative localization propositions”, National Technical University of Athens, Laboratory of Urban Environment, https://courses.arch.ntua.gr/fsr/111935/7finalreport.pdf (in Greek)
45.
RomanosA, 2004Athens: The Urban Question from Citizen's Point of View Athens. (Potamos, Athens) (in Greek)
46.
SayasJ, 2004, “An exploration of the social and spatial division of labour in the Athenian urban space”The Greek Review of Social Research113167–206
47.
SayasJ, 2006, “Urban sprawl in the periurban coastal zones of Athens”The Greek Review of Social Research12071–104
48.
SkocpolT, 1985, “Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research”, in Bringing the State Back Eds EvansP BRueschemeyerDSkocpolT (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 3–37
49.
SkocpolT, 1992Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
50.
SouliotisN, 2013, “Athens and the politics of the sovereign debt crisis”, in Cities and Crisis: New Critical Urban Theory Ed. FujitaK (Sage, London) pp 236–269
51.
SouliotisNKandylisG, 2011, “The neoliberalization dynamics of urban policies in Athens before and after the IMF—EU—ECB stabilization program”, paper presented at the Annual Research Committee 21 on Sociology of Urban and Regional Development ‘The struggle to belong: dealing with diversity in the 21st century urban settings’, 7–9 July, Amsterdam; copy available from N Souliotis
52.
StathakisG, 2010, “The sovereign debt crisis of the Greek economy: a historical view”Sinchrona Themata1085–9 (in Greek)
53.
StathakisGHadjimichalisK, 2004, “Athens international city: from the desire of the few to the reality of the many”Geographies726–47 (in Greek)
54.
StokerGMossbergerK, 1994, “Urban regime theory in comparative perspective”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy12195–212
55.
StoneC, 1993, “Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach”Journal of Urban Affairs151–28
56.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. KevinC R (Guilford Press, New York) pp 137–167
57.
SwyngedouwEMoulaertFRodriguezA, 2002, “Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy”Antipode34542–577
58.
TarpagkosA, 2010, “Technical constructions: from the ‘golden decade’ (1995–2004) to accumulation crisis (2004–2008) and collapse (2008–2010)”Theseis113133–144 (in Greek)
59.
TEE, 1994, “Athens needs a vision”, presentation of the conference ‘A vision for Athens: perspectives and management of metropolitan areas’, Technical Chamber of Greece, 13–16 September Bulletin of Technical Chamber of Greece18266–35 (in Greek)
