Over the last few years a fast-growing literature has developed around the notion of sociotechnical transitions and the possibilities for governing ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Government policies are assumed to play an important role in such processes. However, an important critique has suggested not to see these transition processes as politically neutral but to pay more attention to the politics of these processes. With this paper I make a contribution towards this debate by analysing the underlying political processes and their institutional contexts which led to two quite different approaches aimed at promoting system innovations in the UK and the Netherlands. The main question I answer is why the two governments engage with the same challenge in such different ways. Building on a discursive – institutionalist perspective based on the work of Hajer and Schmidt, I highlight the interplay of discourses, institutional contexts, and interests in shaping policy initiatives to promote system innovations. I conclude by suggesting a typology of possible relationships between these variables and expected policy outputs which helps to explain the two case studies and is believed to be applicable more widely.
AgterboschS.VermeulenW.GlasbergenP., 2004, “Implementation of wind energy in the Netherlands: The importance of the social-institutional setting”Energy Policy322049–2066
3.
ArentsenM JKünnekeR W, 1996, “Economic organization and liberalization of the electricity industry: In search of conceptualization”Energy Policy24541–552
BerkhoutF., 2002, “Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment”Global Environmental Change121–4
6.
BlythM., 2002Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
7.
BreaukersS.WolsinkM., 2007a, “Wind energy policies in the Netherlands: Institutional capacity-building for ecological modernisation”Environmental Politics1692–112
8.
BreukersS.WolsinkM., 2007b, “Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison”Energy Policy352737–2750
9.
BulkeleyH., 2000, “Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18727–748
10.
CampbellJ L, 1998, “Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy”Theory and Society27377–409
11.
CampbellJ L, 2002, “Ideas, politics, and public policy”Annual Review of Sociology2821–38
12.
Carbon Trust, 2006, “Annual Report 2005/06”, Carbon Trust, London
13.
Carbon Trust, 2007, “Making the low carbon economy a reality: What the Carbon Trust does”, Carbon Trust, London
DietzF.BrouwerH.WeteringsR., 2008, “Energy transition experiments in the Netherlands”, in Managing the Transition to Renewable Energy: Theory and Practice from Local, Regional and Macro Perspectives Eds van den BerghJBruinsmaF R (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 217–244
16.
DresnerS.JacksonT.GilbertN., 2006, “History and social responses to environmental tax reform in the United Kingdom”Energy Policy34930–939
17.
DryzekJ S, 1997The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
18.
Environmental Audit Committee, 2008, “Reducing carbon emissions from UK business: The role of the Climate Change Levy and agreements”, Second Report of Session 2007/08, House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, London
19.
EZ, 2004, “Innovation in energy policy: Energy Strategy and Consumption Directorate”, Ministerie van Economische Zaker, The Hague
20.
FeindtP HOelsA., 2005, “Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning7161–173
21.
FischerF., 2003Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
22.
FoxonT J, 2003, “Inducing innovation for a low-carbon future: Drivers, barriers and policies”, The Carbon Trust, London
23.
GambleA.KellyG., 2001, “Labour's new economics”, in New Labour in Government Eds LudlamS.SmithM J (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 167–183
24.
GeelsF W, 2004, “Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis”, in System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability Eds ElzenB.GeelsF.GreenK. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 19–47
25.
GeelsF WElzenB.GreenK., 2004, “General introduction: System innovation and transitions to sustainability”, in System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability Eds GeelsF WElzenB.GreenK. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 1–16
26.
GeorgeA LBennettA., 2005Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
27.
GouldsonA.MurphyJ., 1998Regulatory Realities: The Implementation and Impact of Industrial Environmental Regulation (Earthscan, London)
28.
GrinJ.RotmansJ.SchotJ W (Eds), 2010Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (Routledge, London)
29.
HajerM A, 1995The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernizations and the Policy Process (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
30.
HayC., 1999The Political Economy of New Labour: Labouring Under False Pretences? (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
31.
HayC., 2002Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
32.
HayC., 2004, “Ideas, interests and institutions in the comparative political economy of great transformations”Review of International Political Economy11204–226
33.
HelmD., 2002, “A critique of renewables policy in the UK”Energy Policy30185–188
34.
HillM., 2005The Public Policy Process (Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex)
35.
HM Treasury, 20012001 Budget Report. HM Treasury, London
36.
HofmanP., 2005, “Innovation and institutional change: The transition to a sustainable electricity system”, University of Twente, The Netherlands
37.
IEA, 2004Standard Reviews: United Kingdom. International Energy Agency, Paris
38.
IEA, 2007Energy Policies of IEA Countries: The United Kingdom 2006 Review. International Energy Agency, Paris
39.
JanickeM., 2004, “Industrial transformation between ecological modernisation and structural change”Governance for Industrial Transformation: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Eds JacobK.BinderM.WieczorekA. (Environmental Policy Research Centre, Berlin) pp 201–207
40.
JohnP., 2003, “Is there life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions and punctuations: Using evolutionary theory to explain policy change?”The Policy Studies Journal31481–498
41.
KeijzersG., 2000, “The evolution of Dutch environmental policy: The changing ecological arena from 1970–2000 and beyond”Journal of Cleaner Production8179–200
42.
KempR., 1994, “Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability: The problem of technological regime shifts”Futures261023–1046
43.
KempR.LoorbachD., 2005, “Dutch policies to manage the transition to sustainable energy”Jahrbuch Ökologische Ökonomik: Innovationen und Transformation Eds BeckenbachF.HampickeU.LeiperC. (Metropolis, Marburg) pp 123–150
44.
KempR.RotmansJ.LoorbachD., 2007, “Assessing the Dutch Energy Transition policy: How does it deal with dilemmas of managing transitions?”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning9315–331
45.
KernF., 2009, “The Carbon Trust: A model for fostering low carbon innovation in the transition countries?”Economic and Environmental Studies734–47
46.
KernF., 2010The Politics of Governing ‘System Innovations’ Towards Sustainable Electricity SystemsDPhil thesis, Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Brighton
47.
KernF., 2012, “The discursive politics of governing transitions towards sustainability: An analysis of the Carbon Trust in the UK”International Journal of Sustainable Development15
48.
KernF.SmithA., 2008, “Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy Transition policy in the Netherlands”Energy Policy364093–4103
49.
KvaleS., 1996Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
50.
LairdF N, 2001Solar Energy, Technology Policy, and Institutional Values (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
51.
LijphartA., 1999Patterns of Democracy (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
52.
LoorbachD., 2007Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable DevelopmentPhD thesis, Dutch Research Institute for Transitions, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
53.
LoorbachD., 2010, “Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework”Governance23161–183
54.
LovellH., 2007, “The governance of innovation in socio-technical systems: The difficulties of strategic niche management in practice”Science and Public Policy3435–44
55.
LovellH.BulkeleyH.OwensS., 2009, “Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies in the UK”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2790–109
56.
LudlamS., 2004, “New Labour, ‘vested interests’ and the union link”, in Governing as New Labour: Policy and Politics under Blair Eds LudlamS.SmithM J (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 70–87
MeadowcroftJ., 2009, “What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions”Policy Sciences42323–340
59.
MitchellC., 2008The Political Economy of Sustainable Energy (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
60.
NIDO, 2001, “Programme plan: From financial to sustainable performance”, Nationaal Initiatief Duurzame Ontwikkeling, Leeuwarden
61.
NooteboomS., 2005, “Working towards a breakthrough of bioenergy”, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
62.
OudshoffB.KlinckenbergF., 2003, “Transition towards sustainable production: Policy planning for a systems change”Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry 2003, ‘Sustainability and Industry: Increasing Energy Efficiency and Reducing Emissions’. American Council for an Energy-efficient Economy, New York
PetersB G, 2005Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’ (Continuum, London)
65.
PoteeteA R, 2003, “Ideas, interests and institutions: Challenging the property rights paradigm in Botswana”Governance16527–557
66.
PriceR., 2006, “Detecting ideas and their effects”, in The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis Eds GoodinR ETillyC. (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 252–265
67.
RoseR., 1991, “What is lesson-drawing?”Journal of Public Policy113–30
68.
RotmansJ.KempR.Van AsseltM.GeelsF.VerborgG.MolendijkK., 2001, “Transitions and transition management: The case for a low emission energy supply”, WP I01-E001, International Centre for Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Development, Maarstricht
69.
RotmansJ.KempR., 2008, “Detour ahead: A response to Shove and Walker about the perilous road of transition management”Environment and Planning A401006–1011
70.
RueschemeyerD., 2006, “Why and how ideas matter”, in The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis Eds GoodinR ETillyC. (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 227–251
71.
SaalfeldT., 2003, “The United Kingdom: Still a single ‘chain of command’? The hollowing out of the “Westminster model”, in Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies Eds StrømK.MüllerW CBergmanT. (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 620–648
72.
SchenkelW., 2000, “From clean air to climate policy in the Netherlands and Switzerland: How two small states deal with a global problem”Swiss Political Science Review6159–184
73.
SchmidtV A, 2001, “The politics of economic adjustment in France and Britain: When does discourse matter?”Journal of European Public Policy8247–264
74.
SchmidtV A, 2006a, “Institutionalism”, in The State: Theories and Issues Eds HayC.MarshD.ListerM. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 98–117
75.
SchmidtV A, 2006bDemocracy in Europe: The EU and National Politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
76.
SchmidtV A, 2008, “Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse”Annual Review of Political Science11303–326
77.
ScottW R, 2008Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests (Sage, London)
78.
ScraseI.MacKerronG., 2009Energy for the Future: A New Agenda (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
79.
ScraseI.SmithA., 2009, “The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions”Environmental Politics18707–726
80.
ScraseI.WangT.MacKerronG.McGowenF.SorrellS., 2009, “Introduction: Climate policy is energy policy”, in Energy for the Future: A New Agenda Eds ScraseI.MacKerronG. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 3–19
SharpL.RichardsonT., 2001, “Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning3193–209
83.
ShoveE.WalkerG., 2007, “CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management”Environment and Planning A39763–770
84.
ShoveE.WalkerG., 2008, “Transition management and the politics of shape shifting”Environment and Planning A401012–1014
85.
SmithA.KernF., 2009, “The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy”Environmental Politics1878–98
86.
SmithA.StirlingA., 2007, “Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning9351–373
87.
SmithA.StirlingA.BerkhoutF., 2005, “The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions”Research Policy341491–1510
88.
SzarkaJ., 2004, “Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change: Breaking the stalemate?”European Environment14317–330
89.
TanseyO., 2007, “Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling”Political Science and Politics40765–772
90.
TukkerA.ButterM., 2007, “Governance of sustainable transitions: About the 4(0) ways to change the world”Journal of Cleaner Production1594–103
VergragtP J, 2005, “Back-casting for environmental sustainability: From STD and SusHouse towards implementation”, in Towards Environmental Innovation Systems Eds WeberM.HemmelskampJ. (Springer, Berlin) pp 301–318
94.
VollenbroeckF A, 2002, “Sustainable development and the challenge of innovation”Journal of Cleaner Production10215–223
95.
VROM, 2001, “Where there's a will there is a world”, 4th National Environmental Policy Plan summary, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, The Hague
96.
VROM, 2003, “Transition progress report: Making strides towards sustainability”, Directorate-General for the Environment, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, The Hague
97.
WalkerG.ShoveE., 2007, “Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning9213–225
98.
WealeA., 1992The New Politics of Pollution (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
99.
WeaverP.JansenL.Van GrootveldG.Van SpiegelE.VergragtP., 2000Sustainable Technology Development (Greenleaf, Sheffield)
100.
WeberM., 2005, “What role for politics in the governance of complex innovation systems?”Governance and Sustainability: New Challenges for States, Companies and Civil Society Eds PetschowU.RosenauJ.Von WeizsäckerE U (Greenleaf, Sheffield) pp 100–118
101.
YeeA S, 1996, “The causal effects of ideas on policies”International Organization5069
