The concept of sustainability has been used by city governments worldwide to promote urban development. For some the term represents an archetypal postpolitical construct that enables urban populations and policy makers to confront collective problems in a consensus-driven way. In short, it enables a new conflict-free politics to emerge within cities. This paper uses the example of Taipei, Taiwan to explore how sustainable development agendas in a postcolonial city, which has a relatively young democratic system, are articulated and with what effects. It examines the utility of recent postpolitical writing as an explanatory frame for contemporary political changes. It documents how and in what ways postpolitical agendas have been established and how they have been used to nullify conflict by shifting attention away from grassroots concerns over globally oriented developmentalism.
BeckU, 2002, “The cosmopolitan society and its enemies”Theory, Culture and Society1917–44
6.
BeckUSznaiderN, 2006, “Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda”The British Journal of Sociology571–23
7.
BlairT, 2010A Journey (Hutchinson, London)
8.
BrandPThomasM, 2005Urban Environmentalism: Global Change and the Mediation of Local Conflict (Routledge, London)
9.
ButlerJ, 1995The Psychic Life of Power (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
10.
CEPD, 2004Taiwan Agenda 21: Vision and Strategies for National Sustainable DevelopmentCouncil for Economic Planning and Development, Taipei (in English)
11.
ChangC O, 1990Research of Housing Issues and PoliciesConstruction and Planning Agency, Ministry of Interior, Taipei
12.
CharnovitzS, 1994, “Environmental trade sanctions at the GATT: An analysis of the Pelly Amendment on foreign environmental practices”The American University Journal of International Law and Policy9751–807
13.
ChengT J, 1989, “Democratising the quasi-Leninist regime in Taiwan”World Politics41471–499
14.
ChengT J, 2001, “Transforming Taiwan's economic structure”The China Quarterly number 165, 19–36
15.
ChouT L, 1999, “Institutional crisis and restructuring in Taiwan's planning paradigm”Third World Planning Review21177–191
16.
COSMOS, 2011, “The initial report of integrated strategy of urban regeneration in Taipei's Nan-Gang”, interior document, Department of Urban Development, Taipei
17.
DavidsonM, 2009, Social sustainability: A potential for politics?Local Environment14607–619
18.
DBAS, 2011Taipei's Key Indicators and Statistics (2001–2010)Department of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Taipei
19.
DCLG, 2004Egan Review: Skills for Sustainable CommunitiesDepartment for Communities and Local Government, London
20.
DelantyG, 2006, “The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory”The British Journal of Sociology5725–47
21.
DEP, 2008The Omnibus Achievement of Taipei City Government's Sustainable DevelopmentDepartment of Environmental Protection, Taipei
22.
DUD, 2009The Development Plan and the Analysis of Environmental Impacts in Quan-Du PlainDepartment of Urban Development, Taipei
EvansJJonesPKruegerR, 2009, “Organic regeneration and sustainability or can the credit crunch save our cities?”Local Environment14683–698
25.
GiddensA, 1994Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politic (Polity Press, Cambridge)
26.
GiddensA, 2002Runaway World (Polity Press, Cambridge)
27.
GiddensA, 2009The Politics of Climate Change (Polity Press, Cambridge)
28.
HarveyD, 2009Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom (Columbia University Press, New York)
29.
HeldD, 2005, “Principles of the cosmopolitan order”, inThe Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism Eds BrockGBrighouseH, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 10–27
30.
HollidayI, 2007, “National unity struggles in Myanmar: A degenerate case of governance for harmony in Asia”Asian Survey47374–392
31.
HsiaoH H M, 1999, “Environmental movements in Taiwan”, inAsia's Environmental Movements: Comparative Perspective Eds LeeY S FSoA Y, (M E Sharpe, New York) pp 31–54
32.
HsiaoH H MLiuH J, 2002, “Collective action toward a sustainable city: Citizens' movements and environmental politics in Taipei”, inLivable Cities: Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability Ed. EvansP, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 67–94
33.
HuangL L, 2005, “Urban politics and spatial development: The emergence of participatory planning”, inGlobalising Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development Ed. KwokR, (Routledge, London) pp 78–98
34.
HuangS LWongJ HChenT C, 1998, “A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability”Landscape and Urban Planning4215–27
35.
JonasA E GWhileA, 2007, “Greening the entrepreneurial city: Looking for spaces of sustainability politics in the competitive city”, inThe Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe Eds KruegerRGibbsD, (Guilford Press, London) pp 123–159
36.
KeilR, 2007, “Sustaining modernity, modernising nature: The environmental crisis and the survival of capitalism”, inThe Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe Eds KruegerRGibbsD, (Guilford Press, London) pp 41–65
37.
KruegerRGibbsD, 2007The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe (Guilford Press, London)
38.
KruegerRGibbsD, 2010, “Competitive global city regions and ‘sustainable development’: An interpretive institutionalist account in the South East of England”Environment and Planning A42821–837
39.
KwokRHsuJ Y, 2005, “Asian dragons, South China growth triangle, developmental governance and globalising Taipei”, inGlobalising Taipei: Political Economy of Urban Development Ed. KwokR, (Routledge, New York) pp 1–15
40.
LeeY J, 2002, “Using the urban indicators system to measure Taipei's sustainability”Journal of City and Planning (Taiwan)29551–574
41.
LeeY JLanI CJuangH H, 2005, “Global shifts, developmental state and the town–rural planning revisited in Taiwan—a geographic enquiry and governance crisis for the adaptation of urban entrepreneurialism”Journal of Geographical Science4069–97
42.
LeeY JLinS JHuangC M, 2008, “Construction and application of Taipei's sustainable development index”Journal of Architecture (Taiwan)651–26
43.
LiiD TLinW Y, 2003, “The transformation of social forces: Organisational techniques in Taiwan's environmental protests”Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies5257–120
44.
LinC H, 2009, “Historical review of Taiwan's environmental legislative adjustment and its implications under international agreements”US–China Law Review6(6) 13–25
45.
LinJ W, 1999, “Democratisation under one-part dominance—explaining Taiwan's paradoxical transition”Issues and Studies351–28
46.
LinT L, 2008, Climate change policy in Taiwan: A discourse approachJournal of Public Administration28153–175
47.
LiuJ TYehJ RLeeL LLuoS LWangJ XHuangS LCaiH MShiW Z, 2005Strategies and Visions for Sustainable Taiwan: An Assessment System for Sustainable Taiwan (the Sixth Report)National Science Council, Taipei
48.
LSDC, 2002A Sustainable Development Framework for LondonLondon Sustainable Development Commission, Greater London Authority, London
49.
LuC, 2000, “The one and many faces of cosmopolitanism”The Journal of Political Philosophy8244–267
50.
MooreSBunceS, 2009, “Delivering sustainable buildings and communities: Eclipsing social concerns through private sector-led urban regeneration and development”Local Environment14601–606
51.
MouffeC, 2005On the Political (Routledge, London)
52.
NCSD, 2006Annual Report on National Sustainable DevelopmentNational Council for Sustainable Development, Taipei
53.
NussbaumM, 1995, “Patriotism and cosmopolitanism”Boston Review19(5) 3–6
54.
OngA, 2007, “Neoliberalism as a mobile technology”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series323–8
55.
PeckJBrennerNTheodoreN, 2010, “Post-neoliberalism and its rmlconteats”Antipode4194–116
56.
RancièreJ, 2006Hatred of Democracy (Verso, London)
57.
RacoMImrieRLinW I, 2011, “Community governance, critical cosmopolitanism and urban change: Observations from Taipei, Taiwan”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35274–294
58.
RDEC, 2006Lighting Up the SustainabilityResearch, Development and Evaluation Commission, Taipei
59.
RoseN, 2006, Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies”, inThe Anthropology of the State: A Reader Eds SharmaAGuptaA, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 144–162
60.
SummervilleJ AAdkinsB AKendallG, 2008, “Community participation, rights, and responsibilities: The governmentality of sustainable development policy in Australia”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26696–711
61.
SwyngedouwE, 2007, “Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the post-political condition”, inThe Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe Eds KruegerRGibbsD, (Guilford Press, London) pp 13–40
62.
SwyngedouwE, 2009, “The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33601–620
63.
TangS YTangC P, 1997, “Democratisation and environmental politics in Taiwan”Asian Survey37281–294
64.
TCG, Taipei City Government, Taipei
65.
2004aReport of Exploring and Designing Taipei's Sustainable Development Strategies
66.
2004bReport of the Prospects and Themes of Taipei's Sustainable Development
67.
2004cReport of Indicators and Assessment of Sustainable Development in Taipei City
UNEP, 2005, “Urban Environmental Accords (signed on the occasion of United Nations Environmental Programme World Environmental Day, June 5th, 2005 in San Francisco, California)”, http://www.sfenvironment.org/downloads/library/accords.pdf
70.
VobJ PKempR, 2006, “Sustainability and reflexive governance: An introduction”, inReflexive Governance for Sustainable Development Eds VobJ PBauknechtDKempR, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 3–26
71.
WhiteheadM, 2007Spaces of Sustainability: Geographical Perspectives on the Sustainable Society (Routledge, London)
72.
XuD Q, 2006Housing Price and Bubble Economy (Publisher of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing)
73.
YehJ R, 2005, “Transition and development: Taiwan agenda 21 — vision and strategies for national sustainable development”The Bimonthly of Research Development and Evaluation Commission29(5)6–18
74.
YehJ RShiY R, 2005, “From academic research to policy implementation: The development process and institutional influence of Taiwan sustainable development indicators system”Journal of City and Planning (Taiwan)32103–124
75.
ZhangX-F, 2010, “Dear President, can keep my two lungs”United Daily News 4 May, page D3
76.
ŽižekS, 2009First as Tragedy Then as Farce (Verso, London)
