The urban literature has devoted increasing attention to cross-national comparison of urban change and governance. What is lacking, however, is the development of conceptual frameworks that are adequate to embrace the greater variation in conditions encountered in cross-national research, compared with conditions within a single country. Without such a framework, comparison remains an exercise in depicting unique and unrelated cases. Urban regime theory holds potential for explaining the variety of arrangements through which policymakers in cities have coped with change, because of its sensitivity to local conditions and local actors. Its essential contribution is to focus attention on the collective action problems that have to be overcome for effective urban governance to emerge. The nature of the collective action challenge varies according to the purpose, composition, and position of potential regime partners. Substantial differences in motivating factors must be taken into account in order to apply regime analysis cross-nationally. Drawing upon differences already identified in the regime literature, the authors propose a typology of organic, instrumental, and symbolic regimes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BatleyRStokerG, (Eds), 1991Local Government in Europe (Macmillan, London; St Martin's Press, New York)
2.
BaumgartnerFJonesB, 1993Agendas and Instability in American Politics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
3.
BoyleR, 1990, “Glasgow: Urban leadership and regeneration”, in Leadership and Urban Regeneration Eds ParkinsonMJuddD, (Sage, London) pp 109–133
4.
BrindleyTRydinYStokerG, 1989Remaking Planning: The Politics of Urban Change in the Thatcher Years (Unwin Hyman, London)
5.
CobbRElderC, 1981, “Communication and public policy”, in Handbook of Political Communication Eds NimmoDSandersK, (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 391–415
6.
CochraneA, 1991, “The changing state of local government”Public Administration69231–303
7.
CochraneA, 1993What Happened to Local Government? (Open University, Milton Keynes)
8.
CookeP, 1989Localities (Unwin Hyman, London)
9.
CoxK, 1991, “The abstract, the concrete and the argument in the new urban politics”Journal of Urban Affairs13299–306
10.
CoxKMairA, 1988, “Locality and community in the politics of local economic development”Annals of the Association of American Geographers78137–146
11.
CoxKMairA, 1991, “From localised social structures to localities as agents”Environment and Planning A23197–213
12.
DeLeonR, 1992, “The urban antiregime: Progressive politics in San Francisco”Urban Affairs Quarterly27(4) 555–580
13.
EdelmanM, 1964The Symbolic Uses of Politics (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
14.
EdelmanM, 1977Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail (Academic Press, New York)
15.
ElkinS, 1987City and Regime in the American Republic (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
16.
FainsteinNFainsteinS, 1986, “Regime strategies, communal resistance and economic forces” in Restructuring the City: The Political Economy of Urban Redevelopment Eds FainsteinSHillR CJuddDSmithM, (Longman, New York) pp 245–282
17.
FainsteinS, 1991, “Rejoinder to: Questions of abstraction in studies in the new urban politics”Journal of Urban Affairs13281–287
18.
HallSHobsonDLoweAWillisP, 1980Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–1979 (Hutchinson, London)
19.
HardingA, 1991, “The rise of urban growth coalitions, UK-style?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy9295–317
20.
HarloeMPickvanceCUrryJ, (Eds), 1990Place, Policy and Politics (Unwin Hyman, London)
21.
HecloH, 1978, “Issue networks and the executive establishment”, in The New American System Ed. KingA, (American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC) pp 87–124
22.
JordanG, 1990, “Policy community realism versus new institutional ambiguity”Political Studies38470–484
23.
JuddDParkinsonM, 1990Leadership and Urban Regeneration (Sage, London)
KeatingM, 1993, “The politics of economic development”Urban Affairs Quarterly28373–396
26.
Le GalesP, 1990, “Rennes: Social dynamics and the support of the state”, in Leadership and Urban Regeneration Eds ParkinsonMJuddD, (Sage, London) pp 69–86
27.
Le GalesPStokerG, 1992, “Local economic development: A comparison of French and British experience”, mimeo; copy available from the author
28.
LindblomC, 1977Politics and Markets (Basic Books, New York)
29.
LoganJMolotchH, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
30.
LoganJSwanstromT, 1990Beyond The City Limits (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
31.
MarshDRhodesR, (Eds), 1992Policy Networks in British Government (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
MolotchH, 1990, “Urban deals in comparative perspective”, in Beyond the City Limits Eds LoganJSwanstromT, (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 175–199
33.
MolotchHVicaraS, 1988, “Three ways to build”Urban Affairs Quarterly24(2) 48–69
34.
MooreCRichardsonJ, 1989Local Partnership and the Unemployment Crisis in Britain (Unwin Hyman, London)
35.
OlsonM, 1965The Logic of Collective Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
36.
OrrMStokerG, 1994, “Urban leadership and regimes in Detroit”Urban Affairs Quarterly September, forthcoming
37.
OsborneDGaeblerT, 1992Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
38.
PageE, 1991Localism and Centralism in Europe (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
39.
PainterJ, 1992, “The culture of competition”Public Policy and Administration7(1) 58–68
40.
ParkinsonM, 1990, “Leadership and regeneration in Liverpool: Confusion, confrontation, or coalition?”, in Leadership and Urban Regeneration Eds ParkinsonMJuddD, (Sage, London) pp 241–258
41.
PrzeworskiATeuneH, 1970The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry (John Wiley, New York)
42.
RhodesRMarshD, 1992, “New directions in the study of policy networks”European Journal of Political Research21181–205
43.
RoseR, 1991, “Comparing forms of comparative analysis”Political Studies39446–462
44.
SandersH, 1987, “The politics of development in middle-sized cities”, in The Politics of Urban Development Eds StoneCSandersH, (Longman, New York)
45.
SartoriG, 1978, “Faulty concepts”, in The Practice of Comparative Politics: A Reader Eds LewisP GPotterD CCastlesF, (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
StoneC, 1989Regime Politics (University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KA)
48.
StoneC, 1991, “The hedgehog, the fox and the new urban politics: Rejoinder to Kevin R Fox”Journal of Urban Affairs13289–299
49.
StoneC, 1993, “Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach”Journal of Urban Affairs151–28
50.
StoneCSandersH, (Eds), 1987The Politics of Urban Development (Longman, New York)
51.
StoneCOrrMImbroscioD, 1991, “The reshaping of urban leadership in US cities”, in Urban Life in Transition Eds GottdienerMPickvanceC, (Sage, London) pp 222–237
52.
StrangeI, 1993Public–Private Partnership and the Politics of Economic Regeneration Policy in Sheffield, c. 1985–1991, unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
53.
WaltonJ, 1990, “Theoretical methods in comparative urban politics”, in Beyond the City Limits Eds LoganJSwanstromT, (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 243–261
