Following a wave of spatial planning reforms at the beginning of the 21st century, a second wave of reforms has recently swept through several European countries. In this study we investigate the significance of these latest developments by analysing the reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands from the perspective of rescaling, the process of redividing tasks, and responsibilities between the various tiers of government. We show that the reasoning behind the new planning systems and the philosophy they were based on were remarkably similar. Typical catchphrases, such as ‘closer to the citizen’ and ‘development-oriented spatial planning’, were used in each of the countries under study. Although the second wave of changes is legitimised by much of the same wording, the changes are significantly different because comprehensive visions on the integrated spatial development at the national and regional level have been almost completely abandoned. The loss of this ‘something more’ seems to impact the core of spatial planning.
AlbrechtsL, 2004, “Strategic (spatial) planning re-examined”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31743–758
2.
AldenJ, 2006, “Regional planning: an idea whose time has come?”International Planning Studies11209–223
3.
AllmendingerP, 2003, “Re-scaling, integration and competition: future challenges for development planning”International Planning Studies8323–328
4.
AllmendingerP, 2011New Labour and Planning: From New Right to New Left (Routledge, London)
5.
AltermanR, 1997, “The challenge of farmland preservation: lessons from a six-nation comparison”Journal of the American Planning Association63220–243
6.
AltermanR, 2001National-level Planning in Democratic Countries: An International Comparison of City and Regional Policy-making (Liverpool University Press, Liverpool)
7.
AndersenH T, 2008, “The emerging Danish government reform: centralised decentralisation”Urban Research and Practice13–17
8.
BacheIFlindersM, 2004Multi-level Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
9.
BrennerN, 2003, “Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary Western Europe”European Urban and Regional Studies10297–324
CounsellDHaughtonG, 2003, “Regional planning tensions: planning for economic growth and sustainable development in two contrasting English regions”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21225–239
13.
CowellRMartinS, 2003, “The joy of joining up: modes of integrating the local government modernisation agenda”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21159–179
14.
Danish Ministry of the Environment, Copenhagen
15.
2006The 2006 National Planning Report: In Brief. The New Map of Denmark: Spatial Planning Under New Conditions
16.
2007aThe Planning Act in Denmark: Consolidated Act No. 813 of 21 June 2007
17.
2007bSpatial Planning in Denmark
18.
Danish Ministry of the Interior and Health, 2004Agreement on Structural Reform Copenhagen
DavoudiSPendleburyJ, 2010, “The evolution of planning as an academic discipline”Town Planning Review81613–645
21.
DCLG, Department of Communities and Local Government (The Stationery Office, London)
22.
2006The Role and Scope of Spatial Planning
23.
2007Planning for a Sustainable Future: The Planning White Paper
24.
2010Chief Planning Officer Letter: Revocation of Regional Strategies
25.
2011A Plain English Guide to the Localism Bill: Update
26.
2012National Planning Policy Framework
27.
DCLG, DBIS, 2010Policy Statement on Regional Strategies Department of Communities and Local Government and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (The Stationery Office, London)
28.
DeasI, 2006, “The contested creation of new state spaces: contrasting conceptions of regional strategy building in North West England”, in Territory, Identity and Spatial Planning: Spatial Governance in a Fragmented Society Eds AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (Routledge, London) pp 83–105
29.
DTLR, 2001Planning: Delivering Fundamental Change Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
30.
DTLR, 2002Sustainable Communities: Delivering through Planning Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
31.
EckerbergKJoasM, 2004, “Multi-level environmental governance: a concept under stress”Local Environment9405–412
32.
EliasA, 2008, “Introduction: whatever happened to the Europe of the regions? Revisiting the regional dimension of European politics”Regional and Federal Studies18483–492
33.
European Commission, 1999ESDP: European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
34.
GallandD, 2012a, “Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state socio-spatial project into growth-oriented strategies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30536–552
35.
GallandD, 2012b, “Understanding the reorientations and roles of spatial planning: the case of national planning policy in Denmark”European Planning Studies201359–1392
36.
GalleM, 2008, “Ruimte voor debat: Nieuwe Wro zet in op achterhaalde sturingsstrategie”Stedebouw and ruimtelijke ordening8958–60
37.
GallentNJuntiiMKiddSShawD, 2008Introduction to Rural Planning (Routledge, London)
38.
GlaeserE, 2011Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier (Penguin Press, New York)
39.
GualiniE, 2004, “Regionalization as ‘experimental regionalism’: the rescaling of territorial policy-making in Germany”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28329–353
40.
HajerMZonneveldW, 2000, “Spatial planning in the network society: rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands”European Planning Studies8337–355
HaughtonGAllmendingerPCounsellDVigarG, 2010The New Spatial Planing Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries (Routledge, London)
43.
HealeyP, 2004, “The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2845–67
44.
HealeyPKhakeeAMotteANeedhamB, 1999, “European developments in strategic spatial planning”European Planning Studies7339–355
45.
InchA, 2009, “Planning at the crossroads again: re-evaluating street-level regulation of the contradictions in New Labour's planning reforms”Planning Practice and Research2483–101
Janssen-JansenLHuttonT, 2011, “Rethinking the metropolis: reconfiguring the governance structures of the twenty-first-century city-region”International Planning Studies16201–215
48.
JonesMMacLeodG, 1999, “Towards a regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24295–313
49.
KeatingM, 1998The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
50.
KeatingM, 2008, “A quarter century of the Europe of the regions”Regional and Federal Studies18629–635
51.
KeatingM, 2009, “Rescaling Europe”Perspectives on European Politics and Society1034–50
52.
KerstenP, 2005Een nota ruimte met nieuwe vergezichten, maar kijk eens een andere kant uit …Oproep tot vakdebat over ruimtelijke ordening. Wageningen UR, Wageningen
53.
KiddS, 2007, “Towards a framework of integration in spatial planning: an exploration from a health perspective”Planning Theory and Practice8161–181
LoughlinJ, 1996, “‘Europe of the regions’ and the federalization of Europe”The Journal of Federalism26141–162
56.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999, “Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance”Progress in Human Geography23503–527
57.
MarshallT, 2007, “After structure planning: the new sub-regional planning in England”European Planning Studies15107–132
58.
MarshallT, 2009, “Planning and New Labour in the UK”Planning Practice and Research241–9
59.
Miljøministeriet, 2010Landsplanredegørelse 2010 København
60.
MIM, 2011Beleidsbrief Eenvoudig Beter. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu, Den Haag
61.
MIM, 2012Structuurvisie Infrastructuur en Ruimte. Nederland concurrerend, bereikbaar, leefbaar en veilig. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu, Den Haag
62.
MorganK, 2004, “Sustainable regions: governance, innovation and scale”European Planning Studies12871–889
63.
MussonSTickellAJohnP, 2005, “A decade of decentralisation? Assessing the role of the Government Offices for the English regions”Environment and Planning A371395–1412
NeedhamB, 2011, “Centraal en Decentraal in het Nederlandse Ruimtelijk Beleid”, in Essaybundel over decentralisatie ruimtelijk beleid. (Raad voor de leefomgeving en infrastructuur, Den Haag), http://www.rli.nl/sites/default/files/essays.pdf
66.
ODPM, 2004Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004: Explanatory Notes. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
67.
ØstergårdN, 2009, “Med kommunalreformen fulgte en planlovreform”Plan3–44–11
68.
PearceGAyresS, 2006, “New patterns of governance in the English region: assessing their implications for spatial planning”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24909–927
69.
PierreJPetersB G, 2000Governance, Politics and the State (Macmillan, London)
Roodbol-MekkesP Hvan der ValkA J JKorthals AltesW K, 2012, “The Netherlands spatial planning doctrine in disarray in the 21st century”Environment and Planning A44377–395
Tewdwr-JonesMAllmendingerP, 2006Territory, Identity and Spatial Planning (Routledge, London)
83.
Tewdwr-JonesMMorphetJAllmendingerP, 2006, “The contested strategies of local governance: community strategies, development plans, and local government modernisation”Environment and Planning A38533–551
84.
VerschuurenJ, 2010“The Dutch Crisis and Recovery Act: economic recovery and legal crisis?”Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal [Potchefstroom Elektroniese Regstydskrif]135–25
85.
VigarG, 2009, “Towards an integrated spatial planning?”European Planning Studies171571–1590
